Steve Moore, the chief economist at Heritage Foundation and a Donald Trump advisor, went on Sunday Morning Futures to discuss the current situation with the Stein-Clinton recount efforts.

Moore warned that if the vote is overturned in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania the country will be looking at a civil war.


Steve Moore: Well, I guess I’d start by saying denial isn’t just a river in Egypt. Democrats are still in a state of denial about the election… For the most part Donald Trump won in an electoral landslide. I will say this, if the Democrats challenge this and try to change the election I think there would be a bit of a civil war.

Donald Trump won Pennsylvania by 70k, Wisconsin by 27k and Michigan by 10k votes.

Via Sunday Morning Futures:

Views: 849

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I agree with Ralph. Followed by firearm confiscation. The dilemma becomes do I fire on law enforcement or military? I try to practice Let go, Let God! The real question is what would General Washington, or Thomas Jefferson do? I do not wish to grow old!

Exactly. This may be what Obama had planned.

Ready and acquiring targets.

I started a list 8 years ago.

We should all unite...I'm ready when you are! 

I am not sure.  The dems are always active and the Reps seem to not have much of a spine.  If this happens then it could set the Reps off and with their small town and rural support they would win in such a war.  It would be farmers and ranchers and hunters against people wanting safe spaces.

"The children of darkness are more diligent than the children of light."

Ever heard that???

I have been ready for a civil war for 8 years.  I am more than ready now.

Same here. ..the commies will never stand down. Unfortunately, civil war is the only solution. 

Well Hillary can't face it was a fair and legal election, and she lost. If they recount and it shows that Hillary has won, he'll yes I'll join up for the local milita. Because the only way they can change it now, will be to cheat. Penn is going to hav to go before a judge and show proof of fraud, the only fraud will show democrats tried, but failed. I am just concerned about WHO will do this recount!
No I don't trust the democraps. Keep your powder dry, lock and load, don't shoot before you see the whites of their eyes!

You had better start stocking ammo.

Out-dated advice, M61A1!  That was good advice for those Patriots armed with muskets`  NO NEED TO WAIT THAT LONG THESE DAYS!




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service