“First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”—Martin Niemoller

Poll: What do you think Obama was doing while American's were being killed in Benghazi?

Despite what some may think, the Constitution is no magical incantation against government wrongdoing. Indeed, it’s only as effective as those who abide by it. However, without courts willing to uphold the Constitution’s provisions when government officials disregard it and a citizenry knowledgeable enough to be outraged when those provisions are undermined, it provides little to no protection against SWAT team raids, domestic surveillance, police shootings of unarmed citizens, indefinite detentions, and the like.

Unfortunately, the courts and the police have meshed in their thinking to such an extent that anything goes when it’s done in the name of national security, crime fighting and terrorism. Consequently, America no longer operates under a system of justice characterized by due process, an assumption of innocence, probable cause and clear prohibitions on government overreach and police abuse. Instead, our courts of justice have been transformed into courts of order, advocating for the government’s interests, rather than championing the rights of the citizenry, as enshrined in the Constitution.

Just recently, for example, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in U.S. v. Westhoven that driving too carefully, with a rigid posture, taking a scenic route, and having acne are sufficient reasons for a police officer to suspect you of doing something illegal, detain you, search your car, and arrest you—even if you’ve done nothing illegal to warrant the stop in the first place.

In that same vein, the U.S. Supreme Court declared in a 5-4 ruling in Navarette v. California that police officers can, under the guise of “reasonable suspicion,” stop cars and question drivers based solely on anonymous tips, no matter how dubious, and whether or not they themselves witnessed any troubling behavior.

And then you have the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Hedges v. Obama, a legal challenge to the indefinite detention provision of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA), thereby affirming that the President and the U.S. military can arrest and indefinitely detain individuals, including American citizens, based on a suspicion that they might be associated with or aiding terrorist organizations.

read more:


Views: 1054

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I agree...cannot be too careful anymore in what used to be the USA.......now it is a place  where anything immoral and lawless and abnormal is celebrated and those of us living by the 10 Commandments and are Patriots are vilified....reminds me of 2Tim Ch3

WE??  No Obama and his puppet masters are doing this.  This lame congress/senate are abiding by his every facist wish.  It has got to stop and it will if this congress or the people demand impeachment.

Congress aint going to do a thing its we the people that will have to march on DC in the millions and forcfully take him out of the White House and civally try him there on the spot then when found guilty string him up from the highest tree and then g down the line from there Billery Clinton would be next

One thing that any student of military science knows is that an enemy that can convince you to misidentify who they are and what they are up to is giving enormous power to themselves if they can convince you that they are something else other than what they are, and that they are up to something other than what you think they are doing.  In military science this is called a ruse. 

The Administration and it's cronies talk like Marxist, they employ Gramsci style tactics, Their use of Alinsky's tactics and their vision for the fulfillment of the historic progression of the dialectic are all Marxist. I have listened to blubbering idiots spout off about how Communism and Nazism are the same thing. Believe me, the Communist love you for this, because this is giving them a lot of power. Instead of training our people about how Cultural Marxism has infiltrated and influenced our society, we get asinine diatribe about Obama the Nazi. 

Go ahead give the Communists what they want. Get mad and blubber about how you know all about Hitler, and how it is Hitler who is in control, and not international Marxists. Keep this up, and if I survive I'll meet you in the Gulag and say "Well, I told you so, but you wouldn't listen". 

Last time I wrote about this someone had to write about six pages trying to convince everyone that we were fighting the Nazis, because he was so afraid that it would come to light that we are dealing with a communist enemy. And as if that was not enough he writes all these pages trying to convince everyone that The communists and nazis are the same thing, when they are not. I am beginning to think that we have an ADL troll in high places.  Beware, get off track and sabotage Tea Party and someone else will come along to replace Tea Party and patriots will move into the new patriot party after Tea Party gets compromised. 

World/International Communism, Marxism, Leninism, Socialism, Fascism, Naziism, Maoism, Modern Liberalism, Progressiveism, are all variations of the SAME basic Philosophy - Marxist-Socialism. With discernable differences.

All require Control (power) consolidated at the Central Govt. (Federal) level.  All require a Bureaucracy which will exploit power to their personal agenda (Lois Lerner). All require Redistribution of Wealth (by a Dictator where applicable) and all require the Central Govt. to control the Economy - the Marxist Economic System.

NAZI - "National Socialist Workers Party" Soviet Communism: World/International Communism. Hitler and Stalin signed a non-aggression pact - because they were both Socialists. Hitler persecuted the Communists - because they didn't believe in Fascism.  Hitler persecuted the (pure) Socialists - because they didn't countenance a Dictator.

Don't get hung up on MINOR differences. 'Name' them what they ALL are -  Marxist-Socialists.

These my friend are not minor differences. The ultimate goals are radically different. Both groups have been monsters, but they are not the same. Mis identification can have disastrous results. There will be more coming on this issue. Much is at stake. Mr.  Rosenbaum. By the way, I am Sephardic. 

Perhaps they are not...but they end the same way...loss of our God-given rights to freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and property....and they ALL end with a dictator and us peons under their insane control.....ALL the things our Founders fought and died for, to give us...gone......I cannot look my children in the eye and say I stood by and did nothing..God guides my feet in ALL ways now...perhaps I will see you in the FEMA re-education camps....I will not bow to whatever they are because they are ci\ontrolled by Satan...evil pure and simple!

Of course we are. If people listen to what Odumbo says they would know this. He has stated that one of his favorite persons in history is Adolph Hitler. And if you knew anything about Hitler, you would know that there wasn't a move in Germany that he hadn't micromanaged.

And thats why they lost the war coz he wasnt that great just the same as Obummo thinks hes great hes only a great pain in the ass

“WE WANT GOD” is an answer to the stress in our country. The stress exists because organized atheism is bullying Organized Christianity. When this same stress existed in the Soviet Union, Christians began standing up to atheism on June 2, 1979, by saying in unison “We Want God.” Because of that stance, they caused the Soviet Union to collapse within ten years, marking the end of organized atheism in the governing bodies of Eastern Europe. Peggy Noonan documented that story in the Wall Street Journal under the title “We Want God.” 

The regime of organized atheism ruled in Eastern Europe for more than 40 years, using oppressive bureaucracies and armed forces to impose its rule. In the United States of America, the many factions of organized atheism are abusing the rule of law to chip away at the religious freedoms traditionally enjoyed by Organized Christianity. This process of ‘death by a thousand cuts’ is sanctioned, even encouraged, by a regime that is imposing the rule of Big Government on our country through the use of oppressive bureaucracies. So far, this process does not include the use of armed forces.

You and I and all like-minded people in our own country can also stand up to the bullying of organized atheism. We can say in unison “We Want God,” and we can say it as we decide whom to vote for on November 4, 2014. This November, elect only those candidates whom you can trust to become servants of the people, not bullies of the people. Elect only those candidates whom you can trust to take Big Government Bureaucracy out of our homes and out of our private lives.

 Stand up to the bullies. Tell them “We Want God.”

Also there is a push by Mayor Deblasio for pre-k education in NYC. Though local papers such as the New York Post focussed on the tax issue to pay for it, seems to me it could be used to make sure the little ones get indoctrinated early!

Our federal government is laying the 'ground-work' for NDAA take-over by 'Domestic Terrorists' - 'TEA Party Terrorist' - 'Republican Terrorists' - 'United States Sponsored Terrorists'-  & the list[s] go on & on & on . . . .  




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service