Are Americans Just Collateral Damage To Obama?

As far as the White House is concerned, Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic’s top reporter, is President Barack Obama’s unofficial mouthpiece. 

This was one of the many things we learned from The New York Times in David Samuels’s profile of Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes. 

In the course of explaining how Rhodes was able to sell Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran, despite the fact that it cleared Iran’s path to a nuclear arsenal while giving the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism more than a hundred billion dollars, Samuels reported that “handpicked Beltway insiders like Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic… helped retail the administration’s narrative.” 

Given his White House-assigned role, Goldberg’s explanation of Obama’s refusal to discuss radical Islam is worthwhile reading. It reflects what Obama wants the public to believe about his position. 

On Wednesday Goldberg wrote that in Obama’s view, discussing radical Islam is counterproductive because it harms the moderates who need to stand up to the radicals. 

“Obama,” he wrote, “believes that [a] clash is taking place [not between Western and Muslim civilization but] within a single civilization, and that Americans are sometimes collateral damage in this fight between Muslim modernizers and Muslim fundamentalists.” 

Pointing out that there are Muslim fundamentalists, Obama has argued to Goldberg, will only strengthen them against the modernizers. 

Over the past week, prominent conservative commentators have agreed with Obama’s position. 

Eli Lake from Bloomberg and Prof. John Yoo writing in National Review, among others, criticized presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for speaking openly radical Islam. Like Goldberg, they argued that Trump’s outspokenness alienates moderate Muslims. 

But what moderate Muslims is Obama trying to help? 

Consider his treatment of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. 

Sisi is without a doubt, the most outspoken and powerful advocate of a moderate reformation of Islam, and of Islamic rejection of jihad, alive today. 

Sisi has staked his power and his life on his war to defeat the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamic State and jihadist Islam in general.

read more:


Sisi speaks openly about the danger of jihadist Islam. In his historic speech before the leading Sunni clerics at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University on January 1, 2015, Sisi challenged the clerics to reform Islam.

Views: 496

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

We might as well say the ISIS flag is flying over the White House because of the 100 billion dollars given to the Iran government to build there forces aginist America. It seems the evil comes from the love of money and those loving it are willing to sell out there own country to get it. Americans still have little knowledge of where all the billions went from the bail outs of Bush and Obama. With the fact that Bush won't support Trump should tell us where his agenda is and his part of braking the American way of life. I worked for both Bush's and could see either one could be trusted. There is without a doubt, their is a agenda of a one world order in both of their back grounds.

ISIS is the creation of this Administration.. rising out of the ashes of the Arab Spring ... ISIS was armed by weapons seized in Lybia and then shipped to Syria in a CIA operation... centered in Benghazi, Lybia.  This President and his Muslim Brotherhood Czars  are working feverously too flood us with Islamic Jihadist... cloaked as refugees and ostensibly needing our help.. 

However, a quick review indicates that the bulk of these refugees are single males of combat age... not families, orphans and widows.  It is time that the people take a critical look at the White House, Congress and our Judiciary... and ask what are they doing to protect us?  A quick review will shock most... as they all appear to be working ... not to protect us and our Constitutional Republic... they are working to 'Fundamentally Transform America' something most people don't want.

This election cycle is critical and we must work with the Trump campaign to ensure he is elected as he is the only one pointing out the horrible position our leadership has put us in... our economy, national security, standard of living and ultimately our continued ability to survive as a Nation under God and Constitutional rule is seriously up for debate.  America is in Constitutional Crisis and our current leaders in both the Federal and State Governments are the architects of our destruction, not benefactors.

Their isis leader, the insane hussian oblamea has done everything in his power to destroy us! The only thing that is preventing hussian from doing the Mexican hat dance on our mass graves is our 2nd AMENDMENT! GUN UP EVERYONE!

I have. Thanks. I will not live in a socialist, communist, or muslim state .

Given that not everything is on the Internet, my suspicion is that the Obama administration's so-called failures to prevent the Ft. Hood, San Bernardino and Orlando shootings and the Boston bombing are not failures at all, but successes for  Obama and the left and that in some way Obama is involved in what they did. For example the Orlando killer's father visited the White House.  Was that really to talk about Afghanistan or was tha an off-he-web place to discuss encouraging the son (if that was really his son) to prepare to kill.  

Was the failure to properly vet the wife of the San Bernardino killer team intentional on the part of the State Department?

Why were Muslim names deleted from the terrorist database?

In fact if the State Department had done their job in vetting Obama's father and found that he lied about not having a family in Kenya (he left that part of the application form blank), he would not have been omitted to the USA, and we would have been spared Obama (we might have gotten Hillary, but that's another issue).

This will never be posted, but at least I will try. Ogaybama is the worst thing that ever happened to America. Am I a racist? I wanted Herman Cain for president, not because of his skin, but because of his abilities. Obama needs to go ASAP to preserve the American Ideals.

No further proof is needed to convict the halfbreed muslim playing president, that he is a DOMESTIC ENEMY of the people.  Don't judge this bastard by his skin color, but by his actions.  Don't believe the diatribe of the progressive left or right accusing anyone opposing him is racist.  Call them what they are the ENEMY.

I'll repeat part of the oath of office most needed to remind us all of our duty. and defend the Constitution against all EMEMIES foreign and domestic...

You kill the enemy, not coddle them!  Your enemies don't have CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OR PROTECTION.

We need to start killing these bastards NOW!   Or they will eventually start killing us........



We are not collateral damage but the intended target.






Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service