Greta Thunberg’s heart may be in the right place, but she is being “led astray” by “dangerous people” who are “part of the problem,” according to Anonymous, who sent an open letter to the teenage Swedish climate activist.
Anonymous also urged Greta Thunberg to re-think her policies because they are “misguided” and will only end up hurting average individuals.
The full text is below:
Greetings. This is a message to Greta Thunberg, from Anonymous.
We understand and sympathize with your concerns about the environment, and agree that the blame lies with many of the world’s most powerful corporations. However, you may want to be careful that you are not led astray by people who are a part of the problem, and it appears that this may be happening. Many of the powerful politicians that you met with and took photographs with, are deeply involved with many of the industries you speak out against.
Many of the policies that you are advocating for are also misguided, despite their seemingly good intentions. For example, heavy carbon taxes will not have much of an effect on the fossil fuel industry, aside from making their cost of doing business a little bit higher. The large corporations that are destroying the planet have teams of lawyers on standby for any accusations that are brought against them, and they have money budgeted specifically for dealing with all of the fines that they intend to violate.
Fines, taxes, and regulations rarely actually cause corporations to do business any differently, but these policies usually do end up hurting average individuals who were never even the intended targets of the policies to begin with. This is because the average person does not have teams of lawyers or money ready for fines.
In the case of carbon taxes, the average person driving their car will be the person who ends up paying the real cost, and it is highly possible that the corporations could make even more money under a model like this. It is also important to consider that just throwing money at a problem is not a feasible solution, especially for something like this. If billions of dollars are funneled into government coffers as the result of some type of “Green New Deal,” what happens next? There doesn’t seem to be any plan for what actually happens to the money, and when plans are actually offered, they typically fall short.
For example, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who you recently met with, announced a plan to use money from oil pipelines to plant trees. This does not seem like much of a solution, as many of the native tribes in Canada, who are not very fond of Trudeau’s government, will still be forced off of their land, which they are taking good care of, to make room for dangerous pipelines that are prone to spilling. This type of solution is not much different than the carbon tax idea, it is a small, and likely counterproductive measure that won’t actually address the problems with how humans generate and consume energy, but instead, will just shift around more money through the hands of the ruling class.
It is also important to mention that the environmental impact of war has been entirely left out of many of the recent climate change discussions. The military agencies of the world are responsible for the vast majority of the pollution on the planet, the United States government and their western allies, along with Russia and China, take a large share of the blame for this pollution.
The people who are destroying the planet have names and addresses and they are on the news every single day, but they are never held accountable. In the rare cases where they are held accountable, they usually receive a fine that seems like a large number to the rest of us, but is merely a small percentage of their net worth, so the penalties amount to nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
Protecting the environment is important, but it is also important not to let people who are a part of the problem be in control of the solutions, because we run the risk of allowing them to make everything worse. If you truly do care about the future of the planet, be extremely careful of the people around you, and analyze their solutions very carefully, because you are currently surrounded by some very dangerous people who do not have the best interest of the planet in mind.
We are Anonymous!
We are Legion!
We do not forgive!
We do not forget!
She is an idiot... taxes, fines, fees, duties, licenses, legal defense fees, are all costs of doing business and will be PASSED ON TO THE CONSUMER... the general public will pay for them.
Dupe's like her are not just innocent, misinformed individuals... they are dangerous... very dangerous. They are nieve if they believe major corporations pay taxes, fines, fees, etc., they are all costs for doing business and they are paid for by passing them on to the general public... consumers.
Some individuals like her know perfectly well what they are doing and have an ulterior motive... anarchy and eventually the establishment of a new world socialist order. Her motives are highly questionable.
As for Anonymous... I have no sympathy for secret organizations that wear masks in public while they spread sedition and other anti-social behavior and messages. There is also a very deep and cryptic message when Anonymous claims to be "Legions"... Christians should be wary of such a group... who tag their name with the demonic moniker... Legions
As for Anonymous, they have no sympathy for secret organizations of the US Government, or the UK....:)
Don't you find that a little hypocritical... Anonymous is a private secret organization and they find no sympathy for secret organizations of the government? I find it hypocritical.
At least, Governments have valid national security reasons for maintaining secrets and secret organizations...
Anonymous could care less about you or your Governments to have valid national security reasons for maintaining secrets and secret organizations, sounds all very Rothschild to me....:)
So, you believe our national security secrets should be openly resourced... our national security plans, nuclear weapons, and key armament designs... open for public perusal.
Your trying to be a ass tric...:)
No, just apostrophic... emphasizing the ambiguity in your arguments.
Besides, no one is a bigger ass tric... try to be a little original... plagiarism, even when using slang, is unbecoming in such a beautiful woman.
Is that like kind of anal....:)
No... it is being overtly anal... as sometimes being anal is the only way to reach those one is trying to engage in rational debate.
Overtly anal...well don't wear that pink dress...:)
Unlike men, you associate with... I am adversely inclined to the wearing of women's clothes.
I have been married to the same woman since 1968.... 51yrs for those who are math-challenged. She is the woman pictured in my moniker... I'd venture to say that you haven't been alive as long as I have been married to the same woman.