Amnesty Has Consequences: Conservatives Warn Against Making DACA Law

As is often overlooked in the biased, mainstream political discussion about the president’s DACA decision, the problem with Obama’s executive order on childhood arrivals is twofold. One, it was an unconstitutional power grab by a president who enjoyed using his “pen and phone” to sidestep Congress and essentially make law from the confines of the Oval Office. Two, it sent the wrong message to would-be illegal immigrants: As long as you behave in a certain way after arriving in the U.S., you too could be eligible for amnesty as long as you have a sympathetic liberal in the White House. There can be no doubt that Obama’s DACA decree contributed to the overwhelming surge of illegal immigration we saw in the years after.

By eliminating the DACA program last week, President Trump remedied the first problem. He was advised by Attorney General Jeff Sessions that the order was indefensible in court, and he was facing a legal challenge by the same states that managed to put DAPA – Obama’s later immigration order – on ice. Faced with the unenviable position of defending an executive order that went against everything his campaign was about, Trump had little choice but to scrap the program and restore the constitutional boundaries of the executive branch.

But now there’s that second problem. Yes, Congress and Trump are talking up the eager possibility of passing some kind of DACA-like legislation into law, but while that would at least put us back on solid constitutional ground, it doesn’t do anything to address the specific, underlying problem of granting amnesty to illegal immigrants. And that’s what many conservatives are sounding the alarm about this week.

In an interview with CBS, Sen. Tom Cotton said it would be a mistake to implement the kind of “immigration reform” the president and many Republican leaders have been talking about.

“It is going to open up a whole new category of people who could get legal status, namely their parents who violated the law by bringing them here, and it’s going to encourage other people to bring their children across the border in the future, which is a very dangerous thing to do,” Cotton said.

But even if we take the “dangling carrot” argument off the table, the potential for a DACE-esque piece of legislation to cost American taxpayers enormously cannot be ignored. Because while Obama’s order only covered 800,000 illegal immigrants, there’s no telling how many more would be shoved into the situation by overeager Democrats (and, frankly, plenty of rank-and-file Republicans). We could be looking at a scenario where amnesty is extended to nearly 3 million young arrivals, a watershed moment that would undoubtedly encourage immigration activists to pursue a broader amnesty law.

By any reckoning, this is NOT what Trump’s voters want, and it is NOT what this country needs in terms of expense, legality, or future immigration law.

We’re glad to see Obama’s unconstitutional order off the books, but that’s not the end of the debate. At least, we hope it isn’t.

Image result for just say no

Views: 26

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

First, TRUMP DID NOT ELIMINATE THE DACA PROGRAM... he announced no new applicants would be accepted and that those currently on DACA had 6 Months to register for a 2 Yr. Extension enabling ... Congress or 'HE' to take further action, to solve the DACA Problem...telling them in his own words " they have nothing to fear".  

How the HELL is that solving the problem... The President just kicked the can, on DACA and effectively illegal alien trafficking, down the road two more years; at the end of which time, one can 'wagger' based on previous historic actions, that He and Congress wil provide another extension, from deportation, to all those here under DACA... THIS IS A FORM OF AMNESTY.

Pres. Trump is playing with fire.... and he is about to get seriously burnt. In fact, his entire Presidency is about to take a very dangerous turn.  The people are waking up a major BETRAYAL by TRUMP.  Make no mistake the President is giving DACA recipeints, the majority who are well over 18yrs old, Amnesty.  No other discription defines what he has just done.  Pres. Trump just gave DACA recipients 2 more years of Amnesty, at the end of which time, he assured  DACA recipients that they have nothing to worry about.  Thus, signalling that should Congress not act, he would look favorably on more extensions... to deportation.

Make no mistake Pres. Trump just signaled it is ok to violate our Immigration law... that he favors and would sign a Bill giving DACA illegals 'Amnesty.' TRUMP IS FOR AMNESTY, no if, ands or buts, about it.  


What best describes what just happened is:

1) Obama's DACA Executive Order has been replaced or supplamented by Trump's Executive Order... The Constitution has been further damaged by this Administrations extension to the Obama doctrine of legislating from the Oval Office.

2) Illegal Aliens have been signaled to keep coming... as America is an open Borders Nation... incapable of regulating those entering the country ... a nation that is unable or unwilling to enforce its own laws.

3) The Trump Administration now owns the DACA problem...  Trump has officially joined with the policy of refusing to enforce the current laws... by extending and assuming the mandate of DACA... an unconstitutional act.  Trump is now officially part of the swamp.

I'd like to know what happened between the campaign trail and now.  He was so adamantly opposed to DACA and has now done a u-turn.  Ivanka/Jared?  Swapped favors?  

First, Ivanka and Jared.

2nd, the Generals fired all the MAGA people, K.T. McFarland and others less known.

The rope was noosed. Then thrown around his neck. Then slowly then faster, pulled in.

Now he works for them. The globalists. That's why McConnell and Lyin Ryan had nothing to worry and showed no worry. They knew what would happen.

Without someone next to him, like Bannon, Gorka, Sekulow, K.T. McFarland, to get him out of the noose, until he understood the depth of depravity that d.c., is, he floundered. It looks like a solution to him, the deal maker. IMHO, when you don't know the foundation, that is the result, the winds pull and you go with it. There is no doubt that he is brilliant in his skill set, but, again, without the foundation, it becomes a "just get a win" situation.




“You’d Go To Jail For Contempt”FBI Refuses Order To Produce McCabe Communications

Fox News contributor Sara A. Carter reports that the FBI refuses to produce outgoing FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s communications in response to “a government watchdog group that has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a former senior FBI special agent.”

Carter reports:

The communications in question are related to McCabe’s wife’s unsuccessful run for Virginia State senate and might also contain invaluable information on McCabe’s role in the Bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server used to send classified information, several former FBI sources and a government official told this reporter.

In January, Judicial Watch, a formidable conservative watchdog group based in Washington D.C., filed a lawsuit against the FBI for the communications on behalf of retired FBI Supervisory Special Agent Jeff Danik. Danik spent more than 28 years with the bureau as a supervisor in the counter-terrorism division and special overseas advisor. Danik filed his original Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in October 2016 for McCabe’s communications.

“They have not produced not one text of McCabe, not one,” said Danik, referencing the bureau. “The government is out of control and it’s astonishing. Do you know what would happen if the government subpoenaed you for information and you didn’t produce records that you had in your possession? You’d go to jail for contempt.”

Carter recently told Fox News host Sean Hannity that Justice Department Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, is investigating whether or not McCabe asked bureau agents to “change their 302s.”

A day after the New York Times reported FBI Director Christopher Wray confronted McCabe over unspecified findings in DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report, the Washington Post reveals the embattled bureau official is being probed over his role in examining emails found on former Rep. Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

That’s not all.

Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino has hinted to his nearly 320,000-strong Twitter followers that the next bombshell to drop could involve McCabe’s mishandling of classified information.

“Here’s the next shoe to drop -> was Andy McCabe using secure comms to send/receive classified information? Someone should check on that,” tweeted Bongino. 


Here’s the next shoe to drop -> was Andy McCabe using secure comms to send/receive classified information? Someone should check on that.


McCabe stepped down January 29th, as first reported by NBC News.

McCabe, who served a brief stint as acting director of the bureau, was already expected to leave. He will stay on “terminal leave” until he is eligible to retire with benefits in March,” reports CNBC.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service