Image result for All 4 Presidential Assassins Have 1 Thing in Common

Question: What do you call all four of the American presidential assassins?

Answer: Leftists.

A quick look back seems to indicate that all four of these men shared liberal thoughts and practices.

John Wilkes Booth, who shot President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, exhibited leftist ideology through his support of slavery, a hallmark of the historical Democrat Party. He joined a Virginia militia and also served as a secret agent for the Confederacy. He also first conspired to kidnap Lincoln before he assassinated him, according to

Charles J. Guiteau, who shot President James A. Garfield in 1881, was what described as a drifter, moving from one town tho the next. Guiteau might have associated himself with the Republican party but his background certainly didn’t look like a typical Republican. In fact, he seemed more attracted to groups that practiced leftist theologies.

For example, at one point in his life, Guiteau lived in a free love commune, The Oneida Community, a perfectionist community which challenged contemporary social views on property ownership, gender roles, child-rearing, monogamous marriage, and work. Guiteau was also mentally unstable, as reported that he believed that his mission to kill the president was sent from God.

Leon Frank Czolgosz shot President William McKinley in 1901. Czolgosz grew up poor and was apparently angered by the disparity between the rich and the poor.

Looking for some kind of answer, Czolgosz turned toward socialist and anarchist teachings, according to It is worth noting that Czolgosz was also reportedly mentally unstable.

Lee Harvey Oswald, who shot president John F. Kennedy in 1963, was so interested in socialism that he defected to the Soviet Union, according to The self-described Marxist returned to Dallas, Texas, in 1962, and also visited Mexico and attempted to visit the socialist haven of Cuba before returning to Texas to kill the president.

It is eerie that these men would all share the common denominator of leftist thinking.

However, that connection would help explain why many people often conclude that liberalism is a disease.

Views: 27

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Good one!  I suspect it's still over the heads of snowflakes....unfortunately






Rush Limbaugh Explains How Robert Mueller
Will Attempt To Financially Destroy President Trump

 Special Counsel Robert Mueller has crossed President Trump’s “red line” after issuing a subpoena for documents related to the Trump Organization’s business dealings with Russia.

New York Times reports:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The order is the first known time that the special counsel demanded documents directly related to President Trump’s businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. […] The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow. In 2015, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s emailed Mr. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen at his Trump Organization account claiming he had ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and said that building a Trump Tower in Moscow would help Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh theorized on his program Friday that one of Mueller’s true objectives is to financially destroy President Trump.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

And these requests, the subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, I ask you again, what has that to do with the campaign and with collusion and with the Russians? They’ve already been looking into Trump business in Russia with the Miss, what is it, USA, whatever his pageant is.

Do you all remember during the early days of the campaign there was news that Trump, in a tax return something like 20 years ago, took a $900 million deduction that was granted and survived an audit by the IRS? Now, I forget the details. It had to do with losses that he had incurred in that year in building things. It was around 900 or $920 million deduction. I’ll never forget when it was reported because most people will never come close to ever having that in a lifetime, and to have a guy personally write that much off?

Anyway, I think Mueller wants that $920 million back. I think Mueller wants to prove that that was a faulty deduction. I think that they want to go back, they want to get Trump’s tax returns because they want to nullify that $900 million deduction, and then they want to collect 20 years of interest and penalties and wipe Trump out.

In the meantime, President Trump’s lawyers are in the process of negotiating with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the Russia probe to an end, reports Rebecca Ballhaus and Peter Nicholas of the Wall Street Journal.

Mueller’s tentacles continue to reach further and further.

CNN reported that investigators are attempting to determine whether former Blackwater chief Erik Prince misled the  House Intelligence Committee about a meeting he had in Seychelles in January of 2017.

Prince is accused of using the meeting as an opportunity to establish a secret back channel with Russia.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge spoke with one of President Trump’s personal lawyers about the new subpoena request by Special Counsel Mueller.

According to Herridge, Trump’s lawyer was unaware of the subpoena and said it may be a ‘wrap up’ subpoena or ‘clean up’ subpoena which may signal the end of the investigation.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service