Enforcement advocates insist proposed amnesty must be sunk or tied to significant border measures

Flanked by 100 so-called “dreamers,” Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) expressed confidence that their long-dreamed-about DREAM Act will become law.

The two in past years have sponsored the bill, formally called the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act. They renewed efforts last month after President Donald Trump set a March 5 date for ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which the previous administration created to protect illegal immigrants brought to America as children.

"So here's the deal — I've never felt better about the DREAM Act than I do right now," Graham said. "The March 5 deadline is going to make us act. Failure is not an option. I've never seen more bipartisan support for the idea than right at this moment. The American people have heard you. They share your dreams and overwhelmingly support your dream."

Durbin, who has been pushing the issue for 16 years, credited the young illegal immigrants with sharing their stories and changing their minds.

"As soon as this stopped being a discussion about theory and numbers and became a discussion about real people and their aspirations and their talents and what their lives mean, we started seeing a shift in public opinion," he said.

With momentum rising — and Trump sending repeated signals that he is open to amnesty for DACA recipients — immigration hard-liners are divided over how to approach the issue.

Williams Gheen, president of the Americans for Legal Immigration political action committee, urged no-compromise opposition.

"I'm very confident we can beat it, but it all depends on how many Americans we can mobilize and how fast," he told LifeZette.

Gheen said what is needed is more unity from people and organizations opposing illegal immigration. He lamented that some groups appear more interested in striking a deal than fighting it.

He said anyone concerned about illegal immigration should be leery about trading amnesty for pledges of stronger enforcement.

"None of these promises will happen if this amnesty goes through," he said.

Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, said momentum seems strong for congressional action.

"I think there will be an amnesty," she said. "But the question is how many people will be covered and what conditions will be placed on getting a green card, and what will Republicans be able to extract for it?"

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services statistics indicate that there are about 690,000 people enrolled in DACA, which protects beneficiaries from deportation as long as they meet certain conditions and offers them permits to work legally in the United States.

But the DREAM Act would apply to a much larger population. The Migration Policy Institute estimates that 3.338 million illegal immigrants would be eligible.

It would offered lawful permanent residency — and eventually citizenship — to longtime residents who came to America before the age of 18, as long as they graduate from high school or obtain a GED; pursue higher education, serve in the military or work for at least three years; pass a background check and pay an application fee; demonstrate English proficiency and knowledge of U.S. history; and have not committed a felony or other serious crime.

"I think there will be an amnesty. But the question is how many people will be covered and what conditions will be placed on getting a green card, and what will Republicans be able to extract for it?"

Other lawmakers have sponsored similar bills. Three Republican senators last month introduced the Solution for Undocumented Children through Careers, Employment, Education and Defending our nation (SUCCEED) Act, billed as the conservative alternative to the DREAM Act. Some 2.5 million illegal immigrants would be eligible under that legislation, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

Vaughan said the most important concession Republicans should demand is a reform of "chain migration" that allows green card holders and citizens to sponsor relatives for immigration. She estimates that if 700,000 illegal immigrants became citizens, it would trigger another 1.4 million immigrants. NumbersUSA estimates that the DREAM Act could eventually lead to an additional 14.02 million immigrants because of chain migration.

Congress should balance that, she said, by eliminating or restricting categories of family migration like siblings and their children. She said Congress also could eliminate the diversity visa lottery, which each year brings in roughly 50,000 immigrants chosen randomly from the millions of people who apply for permanent residency under the program.

If that is not politically feasible, Vaughan added, Republicans at least ought to insist that Congress require all businesses to use the now-voluntary E-Verify system to confirm the eligibility of workers they hire. That ought not be a heavy lift for Senate Democrats, many of whom voted for it as part of the "Gang of Eight" comprehensive immigration bill in 2013.

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/graham-durbin-sense-momentum-for...

Views: 29

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Tech companies paying for Hundreds of Thousands of pro-amnesty phone calls to Congress today -- Will you help counter their effort?

Our Capitol Hill team has learned that a number of tech companies are paying for hundreds of thousands of phone calls today, urging Congress to pass an amnesty for illegal aliens. It's critical that Congress also hears from you!

Capitol Switchboard -- (888) 995-2053

www.Numbersusa.com

"...We would expand the ‘Dream Act’ amnesty to include the parents of the DACA illegal families because it’s the right thing to do,” he said."...GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham and Democratic leader Sen. Richard Durbin stated on Oct. 5, 2017, @ Breitbart.com.

The following is a resolution that is presently before the executive committee of my local GOP. Once passed, it will be sent to every GOP organization within our House district. 

A RESOLUTION

Whereas, the Dream Act, the Succeed Act, and all other proposed clean amnesty bills fail to prevent continuing illegal immigration into this country, and,

Whereas, this failure to address persistent illegal entry into this country, will harm American workers and we will be faced with these same problems ten years down the road, and,

Whereas, the record reflects Rep. XX has thus far failed to cosign the "Legal Workforce Act (H.R. 3775)," nor offered any legislation restricting "anchor babies":

Resolve, the XX Republican Party, supports the Raise Act, The Legal Workforce Act, and opposes birthright citizenship bestowed on the offspring born here of illegal parents, and

Be it further Resolved to bring this resolution to other Republican Party executive committees throughout District XX.

Please copy this resolution or write one of your own and bring it to your next GOP county meeting and present it to the group. Also be prepared to go to your next executive committee meeting, if the chairman requests, to present your resolution.

Excellent David. Thank you for posting

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Bill and Hillary Clinton Brutally
Mocked After Defending

View image on Twitter

Crooked Bill and Hillary Clinton were brutally mocked Monday after defending the Clinton Foundation on social media.

The Clinton Foundation’s official Twitter account tweeted Saturday, “ICYMI: President @BillClinton wrote on Facebook this week about our work improving lives in the United States and around the world, from fighting climate change to combating the opioid crisis.”

Former President Bill Clinton’s Facebook post served to correct the record about so called fake news smearing the Clinton Foundation. Naturally, he linked to far left sites such as Snopes and Politifact to debunk the smears.

After touting all the charity the Clinton Foundation brings to hurricane victims, farmers in East Africa and combating Climate Change, Bill Clinton unleashed on Breitbart News for spreading conspiracy theories and false information about the Foundation.

Nevertheless, spreading false information about the Foundation continues, apparently as part of an ongoing strategy to distract attention from real problems and, over the long run, to completely erase the line between fact and fiction.

For example, just a few weeks ago on MSNBC, during a discussion of the President’s disparaging remarks about Haiti, his designated defender repeated the ridiculous assertion that I had taken money raised for Haiti for personal use and was responsible for the apparent suicide of a Haitian who knew all about it. Thankfully, the host cut her off, refusing to provide a forum for known false conspiracy theories. I’m proud of the work the Foundation and I have done in Haiti and will give you a more detailed report on that soon.

These attacks on the Foundation began in earnest with the 2015 publication of the Breitbart-inspired book, Clinton Cash. I thought the Foundation staff did a good job debunking the book’s charges, but they were published as written even in “mainstream” outlets, and even now the charges continue to be repeated online and in forums favorable to those who make them.

I have never responded personally to these charges, but out of respect for our donors, partners, and those who work at the Foundation, I think I should—because as we see, attacks, no matter how outrageous, can have a long life.

Bill Clinton also argued Chelsea’s wedding wasn’t paid for by Clinton Foundation donations nor do any of them receive salaries.

No, Foundation funds were not used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc. It was a wonderful day that Hillary and I were grateful to be able to pay for.

Clinton also argued the foundation was given 4 out 4 stars from Charity Navigator, Platinum from GuideStar, A from Charity Watch, and a 20 out of 20 score for meeting all of the Better Business Bureau’s good practice standards.

Hillary Clinton tweeted: Want to hear the real story of the @ClintonFdn? Read this: 

 Trump supporters savaged the Clintons.

How about when Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Oman donated MILLIONS to your foundation when you were Secretary of State and then you conducted official US business with them? 

What about how Haitian villages that you raised money for are STILL without the homes, schools and infrastructure you promised for them? Where did it go Hillary? Where's that money? Why did you plunder the great people of Haiti? 

  

Unless it explains

Benghazi 33,000 missing emails  Haiti  Destroyed electronics  Missing money
Uranium One Etc

Then no. Nope.  
Not on Presidents day.  

Care to tell us how much the Foundation pays out in salaries each year? 

 

Slush fund? Pay-to-play? Salaries for Sid Blumenthal?
Fraud in Haiti?  The vast majority of funds don't reach people in need?
That's the real story, right?   

 

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service