Image result for dish it out but can t takeThe First Amendment guarantees that the government cannot suppress free speech or favor a religion — but a court in New Jersey is violating both of those promises.

According to a report from the Thomas More Law Center, residents of Bernards Township, New Jersey, have been banned from bringing up the topic of Muslims or Islam at an upcoming public hearing.

That public forum is intended to determine whether a mosque should be built in the community.

You read that right: Authorities have essentially banned citizens from uttering the words “Muslim” or “Islam” at a public debate that centers on that very religion.

The controversy is focused on a settlement order from a district court, which appears to blatantly violate free speech protections.

“No commentary regarding Islam or Muslims will be permitted,” states a legally binding court order about the mosque hearing.

Violators, it seems clear, will be punished by being prohibited from speaking. It’s a tactic that smacks of the Shariah-controlled lands of the Middle East, or other totalitarian societies like communist nations under Soviet domination — not an American township in the state of New Jersey.

In response to the controversial order, the Thomas More Law Center has filed a lawsuit on behalf of Christopher and Loretta Quick, who live just 200 feet away from the proposed mosque site.

“TMLC’s lawsuit alleges that Bernards Township’s settlement agreement constitutes a prior restraint on speech based on content, as well as, a violation of the (First Amendment) Establishment Clause because it prefers Islam over other religions,” the law center explained.

The lawsuit claims that preventing local citizens from voicing their concerns about the “Islamic” nature of the mosque is not only unfair, but also unconstitutional.

“The Quicks reside within 200 feet of the proposed mosque construction in a zoned residential area. Yet, the settlement agreement prohibits them from describing the many unique features of Islamic worship,” the Thomas More Law Center stated.

Additionally, the lawsuit argues that the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge, or “ISBR,” is permitted to make any sort of comments about Jews or Christians without restriction, but the government is actively suppressing free speech in the other direction.

“While claiming that the Township had a religious animus against Muslims, ISBR hid from the public view its animus toward Christians and Jews, by not only hiding anti-Christian and anti-Semitic verses published on its website, but also hiding its significant ties to ISNA [Islamic Society of North America],” attorney Richard Thompson explained in a news release.

“Instead of standing up to defend its citizens against ISBR’s hate-filled anti-Semitic and anti-Christian bias, the Township colluded with ISBR’s ‘Civilization Jihad’ by capitulating to payment of millions of dollars to ISBR, allowing the construction of the new mosque and Islamic center in violation of zoning codes, and now even suppressing speech concerning Islam or Muslims at a public meeting,” Thompson continued.

True enough, the court-ordered settlement which forbids citizens from bringing up their concerns about Islam is clearly printed for anyone to see.

The free discussion of ideas, even if they are critical or controversial, is one of the fundamentals of American liberty.

After all, the First Amendment wouldn’t be necessary at all if everyone shared identical opinions. Protecting the right to hold views with which some group — or the government — disagrees is the very reason speech protections exist in the first place.

It is hard to imagine the Founding Fathers forbidding the open debate of a specific topic.

Hopefully, freedom of speech will prevail… or our country may have deeper problems than we realize.

Views: 63

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Who is this district court judge who issued this order?  Anyone want to guess whether he is a muslim or he recently received a large sum of money.

I find it interesting that I've found SEVERAL articles about this and another case just like it in Ann Arbor MI, and none of them say who the judge is that passed this decision.  Afraid of retribution????

Yes, the left will endeavor to operate in the Shadows as long as possible... they are like cockroaches... their filthy doctrine can not stand the scrutiny of the light.

That judge can kiss my royal white Anglo Saxon ass. To hell with islam.

This Judge is not operating alone... in fact there is a pattern of such acts by liberal judges.  It appears that local governments have hired attorneys who are deliberately shopping judges and then throwing cases in order to overturn our laws while fundamentally transforming America... thru Judicial fiat.

The American Bar Association and Congress are in collusion... with these miscreants. as they engage the use of Judicial Fiat to fundamentally transform America.  We are being betrayed at all levels of government and our leaders are openly supporting these actions.  Where are the calls in Congress to Impeach such Judges... they are non-existent... Why?

The American Patriot is loosing the war for America's soul... one judicial decision after another.  The Patriot must focus their attention on disbarring and impeaching those officers of the Court who engage in such GROSS abuse of their power.  The Law must serve the people...  it must not become the oppressor of the people.  The right of the people to consent to the law is vital too liberty and freedom. We are seeing the law become the whip of tyrants.


Look for more law suites to be 'THROWN' by bribes to local officials... or from members of the local government who are working to FUNDAMENTALLY transform America.  This order by a federal judge should result in the JUDGE BEING DISBARRED and stripped of his appointment... it is Congress that is permitting this kind of judicial activism and betrayal.

The left is using the courts to do what it couldn't do by legislation... they have infiltrated many of the local and State Governments as prosecutors, city and county attorneys and members of the judiciary... with the intent of destroying our liberties and fundamentally transforming our nation using the judiciary.  It is time to purge the courts of those activist judges and attorneys... by the thousands.




California Democrat Predicts
‘Widespread Civil Unrest’
If Trump Fires Mueller

California Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu predicted Monday there will be “widespread civil unrest” if President Donald Trump fires special counsel Robert Mueller.

“If the president does go ahead and fire Robert Mueller, we would have people take to the streets,” Lieu told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes.

“I believe there would be widespread civil unrest because Americans believe the rule of law is paramount.”

“You think there would be widespread civil unrest?” Hayes asked.

“I do. I think you’re going have protests and marches and rallies and sit-ins. I believe Americans would not stand for the firing of Robert Mueller,” Lieu replied.

Trump’s tweets last week have fueled speculation he plans to get rid of Mueller, who was appointed May 2017 to investigate Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump called the Mueller probe a “witch hunt,” which “should never have been started.” 

The Fake News is beside themselves that McCabe was caught, called out and fired. How many hundreds of thousands of dollars was given to wife’s campaign by Crooked H friend, Terry M, who was also under investigation? How many lies? How many leaks? Comey knew it all, and much more!


Trump lawyer John Dowd believes the Mueller investigation should come to an end, he said over St. Patrick’s Day weekend, which added fuel to the fire.

White House special counsel Ty Cobb issued a statement on Sunday, denying Trump plans to fire Mueller.

Trump would either have to replace Attorney General Jeff Sessions or fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in order to shut down the Mueller investigation.

Rosenstein serves as acting attorney general for the Russia investigation because Sessions recused himself from the matter due to his involvement with the Trump campaign.

Sessions’ and/or Rosenstein’s replacements could shut down the Mueller investigation if the two were forced out of their positions.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service