Air Force Veteran Relieved of Duties for Disagreeing with Homosexuality

A 19-year veteran of the Air Force said he was relieved of his duties after he disagreed with his openly gay commander when she wanted to severely punish an instructor who had expressed religious objections to homosexuality.

“I was relieved of my position because I don’t agree with my commander’s position on gay marriage,” Senior Master Sgt. Phillip Monk told Fox News. “We’ve been told that if you publicly say that homosexuality is wrong, you are in violation of Air Force policy.”

The Liberty Institute is representing the Christian airman in case the Pentagon decides to retaliate.

“Are we going to have a ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy for Christians so we don’t get harassed for our beliefs?” attorney Hiram Sasser asked Fox News. “Here’s a guy who wants to have his religious liberty and serve in the military. He shouldn’t have to believe in gay marriage in order to serve.”

read more:

http://townhall.com/columnists/toddstarnes/2013/08/15/air-force-vet...

Views: 1114

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I disagree about not using negative terms.  Being "nice" and not vocalizing disgust about the homosexual agenda only enables homesexuals to be more brazen.   They just keep pushing more, and more.  Are we eventually supposed to be required to experiment with homosexuality?  Oh, that's already done in some California schools "to see if you may be gay."  This is a sickness of the mind.   "Normal" people are suppose to bend to the wishes of homosexuals.  Why don't homosexuals bend to the wishes of "Normal" people?  In my gut, I believe that homosexuality is a form of mental illness.  To be forced to accept homosexuality as "Normal" would be the same as accepting to live the life of a crazy person! 

Until homosexuals permeated the mental health industry, homosexuality WAS considered a mental illness.  I think it still is.  Further more, who cares what the Left thinks?  Do they care what the Right thinks?  Why does the majority of people in society have to bend to the wishes of the minority?  The Left started that insanity.

I suspect folks like Larry are just Liberal infiltrators trying to make us look bad.

Words like dickhead really attract women members and  voters. They love  that kind of verbiage as it shows intelligence, refinement and a good education.

Contrary to the AF spokesman, no one reaches the end of his assignment and is simply reassigned.  He was punished for disagreeing with a Wing Commander that abused her position because of her openingly gay lifestyle.  The one up for reprimand shoud be the Wing Commander.

Reverse discrimination, just another unintended consequence from the same people who want to give you same sex marriage. Homosexuals  didn't like being discriminated against, so now, they intend to demand that all aspects of their sexual practices, and lifestyle be unquestionably accepted, or retaliation will follow.  Openly gay military personnel ( those who continue to practice their perverse sexual lifestyle openly) should not be allowed in a closely knit organization such as our military for exactly the reasons stated in this article. Like Obama, it appears if you put a minority in a command position the first thing they do is seek retribution for not being accepted as normal, or their perception of wrongs of long ago, never made right. The more turmoil Obama and his progressive minions can stir up, the happier they are. Keep America in chaos and the citizens will be too busy to care about the murderous reign of Barack Insane Obama! 

Michael said: "Like Obama, it appears if you put a minority in a command position the first thing they do is seek retribution for not being accepted as normal, or their perception of wrongs of long ago, never made right."

It's more complicated that that.

Some kinds of organization reward outspokenness, in-your-face-ness. Most non-profits attract more donations if they are constantly on the attack EVEN WHEN THERE IS NO CAUSE or WHEN THE CAUSE HAS BEEN WON.

My direct experience is with the 'humane' movement: Humane treatment of animals has been legally required (and those laws generally enforced) for half a century. But the 'Humane Society of the U.S.' (NO connection to your animal shelter or local rescue group) takes in more money than ever with ever-more-far-out attacks on animal ownership, use, and so on.

The NAACP? Formerly a fine organization devoted to advancing the well-being of black people in a country that still had laws that abused them. That war was won -- those laws are gone, and mopping up operations are now largely an internal matter for the black community. But you'd never know that to listen to top NAACP or other black leaders. Oprah just claimed that the Martin killing was as bad as that of Emmett Till in 1955.

Look that one up if the details aren't in your mind -- see if you agree with Oprah. Or could that statement possibly be headline seeking by an entertainer who is past her sell-by?

And so it goes: In these types of organizations and situations the most strident, the most abusive voices bring in the most dough and rise to the top.

Does HSUS tell us anything about the situation of animals? Can we learn about issues, concerns, or attitudes of black Americans from the NAACP?

Do you think we can learn much from gay (transgender, whatever) leadership about what kind of people are gay?

In every case, the answer is NO. The people these 'leaders' claim to represent are NOTHING like they're made out to be.
The average 'minority' in a military command position will be about like the average other military commander. That doesn't mean he won't be incompetent, a total jerk, maybe a sexual predator, whatever ... but he's hardly more likely to be so than the average white, straight, etc.

There's a word of caution that should go with: Some kinds of 'minority' are composed almost entirely of fanatics. Someone with HSUS affiliations deeper than giving them money (LOTS of people are fooled into doing that) is not to be trusted in any position with power over animals or animal-owning people. HSUS has been telling supporters to get jobs where they can 'help the animals' (wink-wink) for decades and stories are legion. A Muslim who wants to be a military officer? There may be some that are okay, but they all know that jihad is a moral obligation.

But painting (as the paragraph above does) all gays as seeking retribution is simply wrong.

There ARE other issues with gays in the military: Gays have nearly all the HIV and you can't do 'universal precautions' against blood contamination on the battlefield. Women are yet another issue: They don't have comparable body strength and endurance and it is impossible for them to be treated as 'just one of the guys'; the results will vary from rape to weakening of unit bonds. These two groups have PHYSICAL -- not attitudinal -- issues.

Put the homos back in their closets and lock the dorr !!!!

Things will not change until the fraud and usurper barack hussein obama is removed from office under US Constitutional law , Article ll Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution . The fraud and usurper barack hussein obama is actively trying to destroy the US Military by allowing gays to not only serve openly in the military but to force their views on non gays .

OBAMA YOU KENITE SEE WHAT YOU HAVE DONE TO THE GREATEST MILITARY TURNED IT INTO A DISGRACE. WHO THE HELL DO U THINK IS IN THE MILITARY ? ATHEISTS ?YOU LET THESE IDIOTS DO AWAY WITH DON`T ASK DON`T TELL AND YOU BASICALLY PUT THAT MONIKER  ON CHRISTIANS NOW. OK YOU WANT THAT!! HOW ABOUT EVERY CHRISTIAN LEAVE THE MILITARY AND YOU CAN HAVE THEM FIGHT ALL THE BATTLES. I BET YOU WOULD NOT HAVE 5000 PEOPLE IN THE MILITARY.

The openly lesbian commander is a perfect example of how homosexual indoctrination in the military is being established.

I agree with the airman, sodomy is wrong no matter what ribbon they attempt to wrap it in.

Why is it every time the liberals get their way, conservatives have to relinquish rights?  Where's the equality in that?  This is just down right insanity.  Surely, as adults, we can agree to disagree, or can we?  With every "in-your-face" act, they create a new prejudice and then forbid prejudice.  Almost laughable.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Steve Kelley

ALERT ALERT

The Fall Of Fake News!! Quiet Shake-Up At MSNBC After Station Hemorrhages Viewers Following Mueller Debacle 

Reports are surfacing about a quiet shake-up of personnel at MSNBC after the cable news station lost more than 30% of their audience after the Mueller debacle.

Apparently MNSBC doesn’t think their financial woes are newsworthy given that they didn’t run any breathless stories about their own failings.

News of MSNBC’s collapse can’t come as a surprise to insiders who undoubtedly are fully aware that their audience no longer trusts them.

One source familiar told Mediaite the changes came amidst mounting complaints from NBC News chief Andy Lack about a dip in MSNBC’s ratings following the end of the Mueller investigation. In May, ratings for the network in the advertiser coveted 25-54 demo were down 32% year over year.

MSNBC viewers were asked: How much do you agree that MSNBC regularly reports made up or fake news about Donald Trump and his administration?

The responses were devastating! While 35% or respondents agree that MSNBC pushes Fake News, only 24% disagreed. That’s a ratings death sentence!

What do you expect from a channel that boasts disgraced liar, Brian Williams, and race pimp, Al Sharpton?

Bright Start News@BRIGHTstrt
 

MAJOR SHAKEUP AT MSNBC - Ratings crater after Mueller Report Debacle! 

MSNBC Shakeup: Jonathan Wald and Dan Arnall Take Dayside

MSNBC quietly implemented a sweeping shakeup in programming this week, Mediaite has learned, appointing SVP of programming and development Jonathan Wald and MSNBC executive editor Dan Arnall to lead...

Flashback: MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow’s Ratings Plummet To Yearly Low

MSNBC primetime host Rachel Maddow brought in her worst weekly ratings of the year last week.

Her show last week averaged 2,324,000 viewers, with an average audience of 337,000 in the 25-54 age demographic, both of which mark yearly lows for the liberal television host, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Maddow first saw a dramatic drop in ratings following the conclusion of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. Her previous low for a week in 2019 was the last week in March, the first full week after Mueller submitted his conclusion to Attorney General William Barr, where she averaged 2,458,000 viewers with 392,000 in the demo.

She spent two years dissecting every aspect of the special counsel’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump conspired with the Russians to win the 2016 presidential election. The night Mueller submitted his findings to Barr, Maddow appeared to hold back tears over the fact that neither the president nor any family members were indicted.

Compared to Maddow’s low ratings last week, Fox News’ Sean Hannity, whose program is often the most-watched among all cable news shows, averaged 3,108,000 viewers with just under half-a-million viewers in the key demographic.

She also nearly tripled CNN’s Chris Cuomo’s weekly ratings. His program only had 880,000 viewers with 225,000 in the key demo.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service