African Migrants Sever US Tourist’s Femoral Artery In Barcelona

An American tourist has been attacked and seriously injured by a gang of African migrant street sellers in Barcelona, Spain, who took objection to his defense of a woman being harassed by the migrants. 

 According to police sources, the migrant street sellers, known as “manteros” in Barcelona, brutally attacked the US tourist, at 21:50 on Wednesday at Plaza Catalunya, a popular tourist spot in Barcelona. The American citizen is now fighting for his life.

 Barcelona City Council has confirmed today that the tourist was taken to a local hospital and that the Mossos d’Esquadra and the Guàrdia Urbana have opened an investigation into the violent attack.

 According to Efe Eugenio Zambrano, spokesperson for the CSIF union in the Guàrdia Urbana, the American tourist was defending a woman who was being harassed by the African streets sellers when another street seller “hit him with a belt buckle as a whip” and “cut off his femoral“, which caused him “a deep wound of arterial bleeding.”

 Efe Eugenio Zambrano says the American tourist is clinging to life in hospital and his prognosis is not yet known.

 The femoral artery is a large artery in the thigh and the main arterial supply to the leg. Injuries to the femoral artery can lead to the victim bleeding out within minutes if untreated. If the victim survives, the injury requires reattachment surgery.

 The incident that has left an American tourist fighting for his life in a Spanish hospital came shortly after Catalan police were attacked by dozens of migrants when they tried to carry out an operation against illegal streets sales in the Tarragona area.

According to Voice of Europe, the vendors used all kinds of objects and chairs to attack the police officers.

 As can be seen in videos recorded by witnesses in the area, the Mossos charged against the street vendors and the latter responded with violence. At least one of the immigrants was badly injured and required the assistance of his colleagues to get away. Two officers were also injured.

 The confrontation came after an operation to crack down on illegal migrant street vending in Barcelona. The Mossos d’Esquadra had identified two street vendors carrying a large quantity of counterfeit material destined to be sold illegally on the street.

 While the agents were identifying two illegal vendors on Sol de Salou Street, a dozen other vendors confronted the police, using heavy, blunt objects, as seen in videos recorded by neighbors.

 Being outnumbered, the police unit was forced to leave the site in search of reinforcements. While retreating, the authorities were hit by numerous objects flung at them by the migrant street sellers.

 Police sources told Agencia Efe the migrants caused damage to two police vehicles, and the two identified street vendors will be reported for vehicle damage, assault on the agents, resistance, disobedience and crimes against industrial property.

 According to locals opposed to the illegal street sellers, the situation isn’t helped by Catalan politicians such as the leftist Barcelona Mayor Ada Colau who protects the illegal street vendors selling fake bags, shoes, watches, and DVDs by voicing their support for their right to sell fake goods wherever they please.

 The Mossos d’Esquadra have opened an investigation to identify the rest of the people involved in the incident. Salou is an area known for this type of disturbance and was the original target of the Cambrils terror massacre last year.

Views: 34

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Coming To America, thats right they are here.




Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

( – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service