Actress Natasha Leggero is under fire for joking that SpaghettiOs is the only food that Pearl Harbor survivors “can still chew.”

The tasteless joke came during NBC’s New Year’s Eve coverage on Tuesday night, when Leggero jabbed SpaghettiOs for tweeting a picture of its mascot holding an American flag and asking Americans to “remember #PearlHarbor with us.” Some have been critical of the brand for using such a sentimental day for advertising purposes.

However, Leggero is now dealing with her own controversy thanks to her poorly thought out bit.

read more:

Views: 1964

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

  Consider the source Hollywood turds who profit for making movies about how heroic these men were but in the back ground they despise them for their convictions. They are the kind of people who voted for Obama and thee Nations future as a Socialist Sh*t hole while they think they will be the princes and princesses. I think not. 

   These men fought and died so these scum bags and baguettes could make fun of them. While the rest of us are under the scrutiny of the PC police.

Along with actress comes the title activist they purport their wares for all to see.  Very nice to pick on great great grandfathers for a pick-up line.  May her great great grandchildren return the favor if today's Vet's can keep her safe long enough for that to happen.  

Almost daily I am astonished not by the stupidity that comes from the mouths of these fools, but our unwavering devotion to paying attention to it or dignifying it with retort. I am reminded of a joke that I heard on a comedy show by Chris Rock who also says some outlandish things, but he is a liberal and get away with it. He said calling out a man for lying is like playing one on one basketball against a retarded kid and calling double dribble, there is just some $#!t you have to let go”. I think this is the attitude we have to adopt when dealing with the entertainment elite. Actually listening to these people as if we thought they had any credibility or had anything intelligent to say is calling double dribble on that same retarded kid…….Let it go. They are like Vampires, only they subsist on normal people feeding their baseless egos.

I have nothing to add. The absolute "IDIOCY" of the statement speaks for it's self!

What do you expect from LIV's......(low information voter) if she votes at all.

What do you expect from a person who has a brainless head.  She is only good for one thing and I think you all know what that is and it is not acting or thinking.

James had it exacty rught. She is a perfect example of what happens to kids when they've been brainwashed all their lives by liberalism. Her and everyone like her citizenships should at least be suspended and be shipped to trade places with people who want to come here.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service