A Court Decision is No Law at All

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Marbury v Madison 1803.

Views: 439

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

there is no rule of law in America when the attorney general runs guns no punishment. then how many times has Obama  violated court orders used somebody else documents false documents he could order the mass murderer of Christians  If you like the final solution congress and or the military would still do nothing. Why scared maybe co conspirators communist agents sent here to kill America

Madason Is right . People the Electried, Lawfull Citizens Make Law . Not Goverments Nore Courts  they are  care takers only.

The people have the power to enforce the law if they so choose... however, that takes personal commitment and direct involvement by the people.  So far, the people have refused to mobilize in defense of the laws of our land and until they do lawlessness will continue to emanate from high places in government.

Yes, you are correct.  We have been hearing this over and over, but it produces NO ACTION.  NO ACTION to me means the answer is NO.  The People are too scard to get involved in any legal matter.

For what its worth, Jim DeMint, Pres. of The Heritage Foundation is working with one of their affiliates to get back our Republic, and so is Hillsdale College in Michigan.  They both need Donations.  They have many strong members and experts helping.

To learn more:  Heritage at 800/546-2843.  Hillsdale: 517/437-7341

Can you blame people for not wanting to get involved in the corrupt judiciary crime syndicate we call a "justice system"? The courts in this country are more corrupt than third world tribunals. Judges are the BIGGEST criminals we have, there is NO integrity. Google Calif Senate Bill SBx2-11. Legalized judicial bribery for L.A. county, and RETROACTIVE (as in ex post facto) immunity for previous bribes for both the judges and the county. Fair trial my azz.

Col.Nelson.  I have put in a Lawsuit in DC which has merit but I keep getting Dismissed due to not complying with Rule 8a.  If I can get passed this, and get the Judges to rule on the Merits, I believe I could win, but I need help.  If you know of a Lawyer in DC, could you give me a phone number?

Thanks, Margot

What kind of case is it... personal injury, civil rights issue, etc.?

The following is a copy of rule 8. (a) for the District of Columbia superior courts:

Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading

(a) Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or 3rd-party claim, shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new grounds of jurisdiction to support it, (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Relief in the alternative or of several different types may be demanded.

It appears that your pleadings don't include one of the 3 items above... or the wording in your complaint isn't sufficient to describe one of the above items. 

The Title of the Case is"U.S. Constitution. Bill of Rights, Civil Rights, Fraud Upon the Courts, Seeds of Domestic Terrorism, National Security.

I have to wait to get the Order and Memo which will tell me more.  Will let you know.  I addressed the 4 Elements of the Complaint which must be present or the Lawsuit could not go forward.  They are:  The presense of a Duty, The Breach of the Duty, An Injury for the Claimant, and The Causation Between the Breach of Duty and the Injuries.  These were given to me by a Lawyer.  I addressed each of these in the Counts.  I gave a Statement to explain the acts of Terrorism that are present in the Courts I was in, and I gave a great deal of detailed info so the Justices could see through my eyes what happened.  There is NO TRANSCRIPT because I was denied my Application to have one prepared at State expense and my In Forma Pauperis in State Court was also denied and my right to an Attorney was denied, though I am indigent and the DC court did Grant me my In Forma Pauperis.  I gave the Court 9 Federal Questions.  The case is 28 pages plus 17 pages in the Appendix.

I addressed all 3 items.  Anyone with a High School education would understand very well what this case is about.  I did not include case law because I could find none.  This case is unique as only someone with a Security Background and Training could know what occurred in the Courts.  After I finish with the Courts, I intend to publish.  I also gave them the Jurisdiction statement and the Venue, and I supplied my Affidavit.

I hope Mr. Obama reads this case. 

This is one of the reasons we must reign in the courts... it appears that the court may be attempting to dismiss your complaint without a hearing, deliberately using an administrative rule to deny our case a hearing.

You will need a Lawyer willing to take this matter ... probably pro-bono.  I suggest that you do an internet search for law firms in the area and correspond with them giving them a summary of your petition. Ask for their help pro-bono, you may find one willing to take your case.

Thanks, Col. Nelson.  It didn't occur to me this could be a reason for the Dismissal.  I have already been searching for a Lawyer in DC.

 So true Ronald , But  the Trouble with Americans is we are a tollerant people so to rile we have a history of waiting to the last moment  or untill it's allmost to late before we take physical action. i only hope our past history Bares us out today when aroused we come at  enemy with a vengence  and never quit .  i only hope that this is still true today, and it usualy is only about 3% percent but that will be enough given our history now all we have to do is  and this is the hardiest part  and the most frustrating the Right Triger.

Well, regardless of whether we have law or not, or Rule of Law, our Judicial System is what it is until we have REFORM.  So, this will obviously take years to straighten out.  Meanwhile, we live with what we have.  In some cases, we will have civil unrest.  Will this change anything?  AND Who will pay the price?

The safest way is to "KEEP YOUR NOSE CLEAN"!  You can still fight through the Courts.




Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich


Breaking — West Virginia Lawmakers Invite Persecuted Pro-Second Amendment Counties In Virginia To Join Their State

West Virginia lawmakers introduced legislation to invite persecuted pro Second Amendment Counties to join their state.

The West Virginia Senate adopted a resolution to remind Virginia residents from Frederick County that they have a standing invite — from 1862 — to become part of West Virginia.

West Virginia freedom fighters broke away from Virginia Democrat slave owners during the Civil War.

This week West Virginia has once again invited persecuted Virginia pro 2-A counties to come join their state.

Sounds like a winning plan!

Resolution 8 reads as follows:


(By Delegates Howell, Summers, Shott, Householder, C. Martin, Hott, Graves, Cadle, Barnhart, J. Jeffries, Maynard, Phillips, Foster, Hamrick, Steele, D. Jeffries, Wilson, Waxman, Bartlett, Paynter, Linville, Sypolt, Bibby, Hill, Ellington, Higginbotham, J. Kelly, Mandt, Pack, Dean and P. Martin)

[Introduced January 14, 2020]

Providing for an election to be had, pending approval of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a majority of qualified citizens voting upon the proposition prior to August 1, 2020, for the admission of certain counties and independent cities of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the State of West Virginia as constituent counties, under the provisions of Article VI, Section 11 of the Constitution of West Virginia

Whereas, The Legislature of West Virginia finds that in 1863, due to longstanding perceived attitudes of neglect for the interests of the citizens of Western Virginia, and a studied failure to address the differences which had grown between the counties of Western Virginia and the government at Richmond, the Commonwealth of Virginia was irretrievably divided, and the new State of West Virginia was formed; and

Whereas, Such division occurred as the Trans-Allegheny portions of Virginia perceived that they suffered under an inequitable measure of taxation by which they bore a disproportionate share of the tax burden; and

Whereas, That this perception was further compounded by the effects of a scheme of representation by which Trans-Allegheny Virginia was not allowed to have its proper and equitable share of representation in the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, That this arrangement arguably resulted in the tax dollars of Trans-Allegheny Virginia being used to enrich the Tidewater through internal improvements which did not benefit the people of Western Virginia, while the people of the Trans-Allegheny had little to no say in how their tax dollars were allocated; and

Whereas, Though this course led to an irreconcilable division, and the subsequent formation of West Virginia, yet, the longstanding peaceful cooperation between this State and the Commonwealth of Virginia is a sign that such separation, undertaken even under the most challenging and onerous of circumstances, can, with the passage of time, yield lasting results which are beneficial to both sides; and

Whereas, In the intervening years, the same neglect for the interests of many of the remaining counties of the Commonwealth of Virginia has allegedly been evidenced by the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, Particularly, many citizens of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont contend that an inequitable measure of taxation exists by which they bear a disproportionate share of the present tax burden of the Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont also believe that, currently, a scheme of representation exists by which the citizens of Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont do not have a proper share of representation in the government at Richmond; and, consequently

Whereas, The people of the Southside, the Shenandoah Valley, Southwestern Virginia, and the Piedmont believe that their tax dollars are used to enrich the Tidewater and Northern Virginia through internal improvements which do not benefit the people of these other parts of Virginia, while the people of these other parts of Virginia have little to no say in how their tax dollars are allocated; and

Whereas, In recent days, these tensions have been compounded by a perception of contempt on the part of the government at Richmond for the differences in certain fundamental political and societal principles which prevail between the varied counties and cities of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, In the latest, and most evident, in this string of grievances, the government at Richmond now seeks to place intolerable restraints upon the rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution to the citizens of that Commonwealth; and

Whereas, The Legislative body of West Virginia believes that this latest action defies the wise counsel which has come down to us in the august words of our common Virginia Founders: as the government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that tribune of liberty, Patrick Henry-who stated to the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 that “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of a Signer of the Declaration and premier advocate of American independence, Richard Henry Lee-who stated in The Federal Farmer that “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of that zealous guardian of our inherent rights, George Mason-who stated that “To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them”; and

Whereas, The government at Richmond now repudiates the counsel of the declaimer of our independence and theoretician of our freedoms, Thomas Jefferson-who stated in his first draft of the Virginia Constitution, that “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms”; and

Whereas, The Boards of Supervisors of many Virginia counties and the Councils of many Virginia cities have recognized this dangerous departure from the doctrine of the Founders on the part of the government at Richmond; and

Whereas, These Boards of Supervisors and Councils have passed resolutions refusing to countenance what they affirm are unwarranted and unconstitutional measures by that government to infringe the firearm rights of Virginians; and

Whereas, The actions of the government at Richmond undertaken since the recent general election have, regrettably, resulted in unproductive contention and escalating a lamentable state of civic tension; and

Whereas, That, as has been proven in numerous instances, such as have been observed internationally in more recent times with the peaceful dissolutions of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union, and the creation of South Sudan, or, earlier in Virginia’s own history, with the formation of Kentucky, the peaceful partition of neighboring peoples can occur, and, is often very beneficial to both sides in reducing tensions and improving the tenor of discourse over ongoing political and societal differences; and

Whereas, Article VI, Section 11 of The Constitution of the State of West Virginia explicitly permits additional territory to be admitted into, and become part of this state, with the consent of the Legislature and of a majority of the qualified voters of the state; and

Whereas, In a spirit of conciliation, the Legislature of West Virginia hereby extends an invitation to our fellow Virginians who wish to do so, to join us in our noble experiment of 156 years of separation from the government at Richmond; and, we extend an invitation to any constituent county or city of the Commonwealth of Virginia to be admitted to the body politic of the State of West Virginia, under the conditions set forth in our state Constitution, specifically, with the consent of a majority of the voters of such county or city voting upon such proposition; and we hereby covenant that their many grievances shall be addressed, and, we further covenant with them that their firearms rights shall be protected to the fullest extent possible under our Federal and State Constitutions; and

Whereas, Providing that the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia shall give its assent to any county or independent city presently part of the Commonwealth of Virginia having the opportunity and ability to do so, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Legislature of West Virginia.

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service