15 States Finally Standing Up Against Obama’s Unconstitutional Regulations

Fifteen State Attorney Generals have filed suit against Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency for their sweeping and unconstitutional carbon regulations.

The fifteen states who petitioned the court on Thursday are West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

If you are like me, you are wondering where your state is in the list.

The Blaze reports that under the unconstitutional regulations, the EPA will “regulate the electricity industry and require states and utility companies to meet goals, providing rewards and penalties.”

EPA spokeswoman Liz Purchia told Reuters, “To ensure that the Clean Power Plan’s significant health benefits and progress against climate change are delivered to all Americans, EPA and the Department of Justice will vigorously defend it in court.”

Fine, but you have no constitutional authority to do so.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said, “This rule is the most far-reaching energy regulation in the ... to transform itself from an environmental regulator to a central planning agency for states’ energy economies. The Clean Air Act was never intended to be used to create this type of regulatory regime, and it flies in the face of the powers granted to states under the U.S. Constitution.”

The attempt by the states could be more easily dismissed through nullification of EPApolicies, since they are not even law and since the EPA is an unconstitutional agency. However, something had to be done immediately.

“If we were to wait on the EPA to get this rule published, it could be well into 2016 before the States complete arguments and receive a ruling on a request to stay this rule,” Attorney General Morrisey said. “By that time, many states will already be in the middle of drafting their compliance plans ahead of the September 2016 deadline. We want to ensure that no more taxpayer money or resources are wastefully spent in an attempt to comply with this unlawful rule that we believe will ultimately be thrown out in court.”

“While this request is not typical, the EPA is playing games by putting the risk of a delay in publication entirely on the states,” Morrisey added. “We hope the court will spare our states any more unnecessary harm, and that the EPA will not needlessly delay the publication date.”

Of course, Barack Obama, being the Marxist that he is, called the unconstitutional measures “the single most important step the U.S. has ever taken to fight climate change.”

The problem is that there is no climate change. There is no global warming. All of this is false science in order to extort money from the American people, impose communism inAmerica, shutdown business and eventually control the people.

“This is one of those rare issues because of its magnitude, because of its scope, that if we don’t get it right, we may not be able to reverse it,” Obama said. “There is such a thing as being too late when it comes to climate change. That doesn’t mean it’s hopeless. We can take action.”

The problem is that men do no create the weather or change the climate. God does. He determines how far the seas go (Job 38:8-11) and how hard the winds blow (matt 4:39). Yes, even hurricanes, tempests and such are at His command. Climate change is nothing more than a ruse. It is a lie because it comes from those whose father is the father of lies (John 8:44), the devil.

It’s long past time that states began to start banding together to ignore, not go to court with, the federal government in matters like this. Furthermore, they should ignore the court’s ruling, which is just that (ie. A ruling), and begin nullifying and interposing themselves between citizens, businesses and other entities in the states and the federal government.

Better yet, why don’t we simply band together to eliminate the federal government altogether and go back to sovereign states and Articles of Confederation. That would eliminate much of the tyranny that is strangling us today.

Courtesy of Freedom Outpost.

Share this:


Views: 881

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I am very happy that my state - Florida is in the list. The real question is where are the other 35 states?  I am encouraged Obama is being challenged Our future with O in office lies in the power of the states. 

Ditto...I'm glad to see Kansas on there too

Steve, the States on the list are mostly Southern and Midwestern.  These are the states that have been hit hard economically.  There will be more coming.  I am of the Opinion that we will see a Separation of some kind in the near future.  Yes, it is about the POWER of the States.  It will come down to The States vs The Federal UNITED STATES.

God Help Us All.

Elaine - Not to worry; Texas stands up, all by herself and at the moment, she has that immigration lawsuit going on.  I don't know for sure, but has Texas allowed any of the EPA garbage to be enacted there?

I haven't heard anything so I can't answer that. Sorry I would like us (Texans) to fight tooth and nail to stop it.

You should be more worried about the recycled sewer water you drink.The St Johns is only a mixture into your drinking water.

So, will this lead to a secsession of the States?  To disolve the Union?  Will we do what The Soviet Union did and follow suit back to independent States/Countries?  What will happen to our Constitution?

Will there no longer be a United States of America?  Will each State stand on its own?  Sink or swim?  Some States grow and prosper, and others shrink and die?  America will be no more?

There will have to be a catastrophic event to start this ball rolling.  What will it be?


Margot- We've already had one "catastrophic event" that involved several states; that was the heavy metal contamination of the Animas River, from the Gold King Mine, in Colorado.  Co's governor "chickenpooper" could care less and claims, "the water's clear, the contamination is gone"! (NOT)!!  Arizona, Utah and New Mexico, especially the Indian Reservations and Pueblos, may very well give the EPA and the "regime" a whole lot more to think about.

Then the governor should not have any problem drinking a 12 oz. glass or two right out of the river.

June, thanks for the Microscopic view.  BUT I am thinking OUTSIDE US, MACRO, am looking at FINANCIAL COLLAPSE coming sooner than you think.  When this happens and many US Banks close and you can't access your money, i.e. Cyprus, it won't matter about what EPA or O or our Congress does!  It will be a matter of SURVIVAL.  Those of us who are on Farm Land and have Ponds, streams, rivers, will have water and have our own wells and septic systems and Land to grow fruits and veggies.  Ask any Mainer how he survives.  He can live without Power from the Electric Company if he has to.  He can go back in time to early 1900s and even late 1800s and make do.  My Mom born in 1906 in Canada told me they had no electricity or vehicles when she was growing up.  They used Oil Lamps and Candles, Horse n Buggy, and plain old Walking.  Mainers remember it too.

Its a hard life, but we may need to live it again.  I am 75, I camp at times.  I can take care of myself the old fashioned way if need be.  EPA can "Go to the Devil". 

Psalm 91!




Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel


Florida Sheriff — “I Will Not Enforce Assault Weapons Ban, Neither Will Most Sheriffs”

Dennis Lemma, who is the Sheriff in Central Florida’s Seminole County, told a group of 2nd Amendment activists recently that he would not enforce an assault weapons ban that could soon become Florida law if the “Ban Assault Weapons Now” amendment passes in the Sunshine State.

According to News965, the ban has the following specifications.

The amendment proposed in the state legislature would ban possession of assault weapons, which are defined as “semiautomatic rifles and shotguns capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition at once, either in fixed or detachable magazine, or any other ammunition feeding device.”

Lemma, an ardent supporter of the 2nd Amendment and a first term sheriff who is running for re-election, said this about whether or not he would enforce such a law.

“It’s not only that I wouldn’t, the majority of sheriffs across the state would not do it,” Lemma said in the video. It’s up to the sheriffs what they are willing to enforce.”

Trump Holds Rally in Milwaukee, WI 1-14-20

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service