Dem Senator Patrick Leahy Threatens Supreme Court.... Did Kagan Leak Information About The Chief Justice????

Dem Senator Threatens Supreme Court


 

Patrick Leahy SC Dem Senator Threatens Supreme Court

Two months ago, Barack Obama decided he could intimidate the United States Supreme Court into finding his namesake healthcare plan Constitutional. Overturning the Affordable Care Act “…would amount to an unprecedented, extraordinary step of judicial activism” said the President at a rare White House news conference, adding “…I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

Though someone with the hyper-arrogant mentality of the Manchurian Candidate doesn’t really need a reason to direct this sort of psycho-babble at a presumptive enemy, Obama was probably responding to information provided by far left Justice Elena Kagan that the Court’s closed-door, preliminary vote on ObamaCare had not gone very well. Each Friday, the 9 justices gather for an initial vote on the cases heard during the week. And although these weekly conferences are to be strictly confidential, it’s a safe bet that Obama’s Court stoolie was on the phone with the White House minutes after its conclusion.

However, as this preemptive strike on the court was met with a nationwide flurry of criticism even from a number of his media supporters, Obama made no further reference to the prospective ruling.

But on Monday, a new county was heard from. Dedicated leftist Senator Patrick Leahy directed a 2000 word dissertation at the Court from the Senate floor, selecting as his principle target Chief Justice John Roberts. “The constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act is the current instance in which narrow ideology and partisanship are pressuring the Supreme Court to intervene where it should not,” claimed Leahy, making clear his view that the Court has no business interfering with a Congressional assault on the Constitution. The senator advanced the 2000 Bush/Gore decision as an example of the sort of “judicial activism” that “shook the confidence of the American people in the Supreme Court.”  He ridiculed conservative justices for their tough questioning of principle ObamaCare advocate Solicitor General Donald Verilli during oral arguments, stating “their action will not help restore American’s confidence in the Court to fairly apply the law.”

And he alternately praised and threatened the Chief Justice, literally claiming that if Roberts joined other conservatives in a 5-4 decision against ObamaCare it would “…undoubtedly further erode the reputation and legitimacy of the Supreme Court.”

But what prompted Leahy’s sudden decision to lecture the Supreme Court as to its proper role in government? Was it a last ditch effort to intimidate justices into finding ObamaCare constitutional? Or has Kagan perhaps advised Democrats that Roberts is “wavering” a bit, leading Leahy to believe his misguided, nonsensical claims might persuade the Chief Justice to decide in favor of passage?

Since its enactment in 2010, liberals have believed the Affordable Care Act to be a sure thing to pass Constitutional muster. They were stunned when Justices took offense at the law’s contempt for individual liberty during oral arguments. After all, how could forcing Americans to purchase something they don’t want be unconstitutional if it’s for their own good!

If 5 Justices rule the ObamaCare individual mandate unconstitutional, the American people will hear a wailing and gnashing of teeth unequaled since the pro-Gore efforts of the Florida Supreme Court were undone after the 2000 election. We will be in for some very entertaining days.


Related posts:

  1. Does Obama Already Know The  Supreme Court’s Decision On ObamaCare? If the Supreme Court has followed long standing tradition, the…
  2. Will Obama Defy Supreme Court If ObamaCare Is Ruled Unconstitutional? For 2 years, champions of ObamaCare have been careful to…

Views: 1051

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Who the H is Leahy to lecture the Supreme Court?

I wouldn't be surprised if Kagan told obama the direction the court was taking on the piece of trash legislation. She is as unsuitable for the S. Court as obama is the presidency.

It's highly probable that Kagan did share information, only because she was nominated by him to scratch his back, according to reports.  And then there's mouthy Leahy who needs to retire NOW.  There are so many backstabbers in the w.h.  The Supreme Court is just that...supreme, and obamanation doesn't want to give in to their decision(s).  As I continue to read all the garbage being spewed by the leftist, I can't tell who is telling any truth to anything, so it's just a sore spot, and then I pull up my suspenders and go onto the next.

PATRICK LEAHEY IS A DISGRACE TO THE NAME PATRICK. HE IS A FLAG BURNER AND A BABY KILLER. A LOSE LIPPER WHO HAS DAMAGED THIS NATION SINCE HE WAS HATCHED. HE COMES FROM THE STATE THAT GIVES US BERNIE SANDERS. TO ME BOTH ARE COMMUNISTS. LOOK ASHAMED VERMONT AT WHAT YOU SEND TO KILL THE COUNTRY. THE STATE THAT HAS PEDOPHILE SYMPATICO  JUDGES. IF YOU MUST VACATION IN VERMONT BE SURE NOT TO BRING THE KIDS. O'REILLY HAS YOUR NUMBER.

WWW.MEDIACRAPMATTERS.US

 

I'm beginning to have the same feeling as the citizens of Europe after their countries were Liberated by the Allies, when it came time to pay Restitution to the Collaborators and Traitors to their countries.  There WILL be a time, not far off that We are going to Liberate our Nation !  I'm making a list...i'm told i'm on a list....just Who the Traitors and Collaborators are to our nation and Constitution.   We Shall Not Forget !    And, that's all i have to say about this.         Semper Fidelis

Perhaps Leahy should turn his focus on Obama and lecture OBAMA about what it means to function under the Constitution.

Exactly right!

LEAHY , KAGAN , SOTOMAYER , BIDEN , ' HITLERY ' CLINTON , obummer AND THE ENTIRE MIS~ADMINISTRATION CAN GO BACK TO HELL FROM WHENCE THEY CAME . " WE THE PEOPLE " HATE YOUR ILLEGAL IDEAS AND WE HATE YOUR " FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGING " AMERICA . WE LOVE AMERICA JUST THE WAY IT WAS FOUNDED , AND YOU FOOLS WANT TO CHANGE IT TO A SOCIALIST NATION . WE WILL KICK EVERY ONE OF YOU OUT ON YOUR ASSES     AND RESTORE AMERICA TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC WE KNOW .

Get term limits. That would help break up of code of silence and keep new elected officials to remember that they work for us, we are not their slaves, they are not the elite. Kick their ass out of office they first time they don't uphold our constitution.

Nothing is going to happen till we stand together.

These jerks wanna be careful who they threaten. Without the Supreme Court you have no law. With no law you have anarchy. With anarchy you have revolt. And in a revolution, the pee-ons will NOT be the first to go.  Not at all.

Leary is a left wing-nut. Vt. has been trying to get rid of that clown for a long time.  Kagan is a disgrace as a Justice of the SJC.  Should Bozo our Communist Muslim Dictator choose to disobey the SJC I can almost assure everyone that there will be a 1776 moment in the USA for a second time!!!!

And I think that time is getting closer and closer.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Bill and Hillary Clinton Brutally
Mocked After Defending

View image on Twitter

Crooked Bill and Hillary Clinton were brutally mocked Monday after defending the Clinton Foundation on social media.

The Clinton Foundation’s official Twitter account tweeted Saturday, “ICYMI: President @BillClinton wrote on Facebook this week about our work improving lives in the United States and around the world, from fighting climate change to combating the opioid crisis.”

Former President Bill Clinton’s Facebook post served to correct the record about so called fake news smearing the Clinton Foundation. Naturally, he linked to far left sites such as Snopes and Politifact to debunk the smears.

After touting all the charity the Clinton Foundation brings to hurricane victims, farmers in East Africa and combating Climate Change, Bill Clinton unleashed on Breitbart News for spreading conspiracy theories and false information about the Foundation.

Nevertheless, spreading false information about the Foundation continues, apparently as part of an ongoing strategy to distract attention from real problems and, over the long run, to completely erase the line between fact and fiction.

For example, just a few weeks ago on MSNBC, during a discussion of the President’s disparaging remarks about Haiti, his designated defender repeated the ridiculous assertion that I had taken money raised for Haiti for personal use and was responsible for the apparent suicide of a Haitian who knew all about it. Thankfully, the host cut her off, refusing to provide a forum for known false conspiracy theories. I’m proud of the work the Foundation and I have done in Haiti and will give you a more detailed report on that soon.

These attacks on the Foundation began in earnest with the 2015 publication of the Breitbart-inspired book, Clinton Cash. I thought the Foundation staff did a good job debunking the book’s charges, but they were published as written even in “mainstream” outlets, and even now the charges continue to be repeated online and in forums favorable to those who make them.

I have never responded personally to these charges, but out of respect for our donors, partners, and those who work at the Foundation, I think I should—because as we see, attacks, no matter how outrageous, can have a long life.

Bill Clinton also argued Chelsea’s wedding wasn’t paid for by Clinton Foundation donations nor do any of them receive salaries.

No, Foundation funds were not used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc. It was a wonderful day that Hillary and I were grateful to be able to pay for.

Clinton also argued the foundation was given 4 out 4 stars from Charity Navigator, Platinum from GuideStar, A from Charity Watch, and a 20 out of 20 score for meeting all of the Better Business Bureau’s good practice standards.

Hillary Clinton tweeted: Want to hear the real story of the @ClintonFdn? Read this: 

 Trump supporters savaged the Clintons.

How about when Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Oman donated MILLIONS to your foundation when you were Secretary of State and then you conducted official US business with them? 

What about how Haitian villages that you raised money for are STILL without the homes, schools and infrastructure you promised for them? Where did it go Hillary? Where's that money? Why did you plunder the great people of Haiti? 

  

Unless it explains

Benghazi 33,000 missing emails  Haiti  Destroyed electronics  Missing money
Uranium One Etc

Then no. Nope.  
Not on Presidents day.  

Care to tell us how much the Foundation pays out in salaries each year? 

 

Slush fund? Pay-to-play? Salaries for Sid Blumenthal?
Fraud in Haiti?  The vast majority of funds don't reach people in need?
That's the real story, right?   

 

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service