What The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know The father of the U.N. was an American communist

A young American diplomat was the leading force in the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the preliminary planning for the U.N. was done. He was Roosevelt's right-hand man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe were drawn (Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten weeks later). At Yalta it was agreed that the Soviet Union would have three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N. General Assembly, even though the United States had only one. At Yalta much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta, Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin appointed this young diplomatic shining star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N. for the founding conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.

All of this seemed well and good until three years later. Alger Hiss was exposed as a communist spy and sent to prison. Only then did people understand why the emblem of the United Nations looked so much like the emblem of the Soviet Union. It now made sense that the Soviet Union, at Yalta, was given control over all of Eastern Europe. Then everyone understood how the Soviet Union managed to capture three votes in the U.N. General Assembly compared to one for the United States. Then it became clear why a secret deal had been struck stating that a communist would always hold the office of of head of the U.N. military.

The U.N. charter was authored by a communist, the first U.N. Secretary-general was a communist, and the U.N., from the beginning, was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.

On a recent tour of the U.N., not one mention was made of any of this by our guide. Hiss' name was not mentioned one time. When pictures of the founding conference contained his picture, our U.N. guide avoided telling us who it was.

I'm sure everyone was taught about the United Nations and its importance in school, but I'm also sure that the above information was conveniently omitted from your textbooks!

Secret agreement: U.N. military to always be commanded by a communist
One of the most important positions within the entire United Nations—if not the most important—is that of Undersecretary-general for Political and Security Council Affairs. Most Americans have never even heard of this position, much
less anything about the man who holds the job. The undersecretary-general for political and security council affairs has three main areas of responsibility. They are:

  • Control of all military and police functions of the United Nations peacekeeping forces.
  • Supervision of all disarmament moves on the part of member nations
  • Control of all atomic energy ultimately entrusted to the United nations for peaceful and “other purposes”.

In view of the fact that these three functions may soon constitute the ultimate power of life and death over every human being on the face of the earth (once national disarmament is achieved and all military is under the control of the U.N.), there would appear to be some minor justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who wields this power. Since the United Nations was created in 1945 there have been fifteen men appointed to the position of undersecretary-general of political and security council affairs. Astonishingly, every single one of them has been a communist!

Communists appointed to the position of undersecretary-general

  • Arkady Sobolev--USSR (1946-1949)
  • Konstantin Zinchenko—USSR (1949-53)
  • Ilya Tehernychev—Ygoslavia (1954-1957)
  • Anatoly F. Dobrynin—USSR (1958-1960)
  • Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev—USSR (1960-1962)
  • Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev—USSR (1962-1963)
  • Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov—USSR (1963-1963)
  • Alexie E. Nesterenko—USSR (1965-1968)
  • Leonid N. Kutakov—USSR (1968-1973)
  • Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR (1973-1978)
  • Mikhail D. Sytenko—USSR (1978-1981)
  • Viacheslav A. Ustinov—USSR (1981-1986)
  • Uasiliy S. Safronchuk—USSR (1987-1992)
  • Vladimir Petrovsky—Russia , “former USSR (1992-)
  • James O. C. Jonah—Sierra Leone (Co-chairman)

Some observers feel that fifteen Communists out of fifteen appointees constitutes a trend of sorts. But whatever we call it, Trygve Lie, the first secretary-general of the United Nations, revealed that this pattern was no mere coincidence. In his book In the cause of Peace Lie wrote: "Mr. Vyshinsky (of the USSR) did not delay his approach. He was the first to inform me of an understanding which the Big Five had reached in London on the appointment of a Soviet national as assistant secretary-general for political and security council affairs...

"Mr. Stettinius (U.S Secretary of State) confirmed to me that he had agreed with the Soviet delegation in the matter...

"The preservation of international peace and security was the organization's highest responsibility, and it was to entrusting the direction of the Secretariat department most concerned with this to a Soviet national that the Americans had agreed." (From The Fearful Master by Edward Griffin)

Every U.N. Secretary-general has been a socialist
No wonder someone said that the truth is stranger than fiction! This incredible saga of the United Nations just goes on and on. Perhaps the most revealing fact of all concerning the powers that control the United Nations is that every single Secretary-general since the U.N.'s formation has been a socialist.

Trygve Lie from Norway was the first elected head of the U.N. He was chosen by the fifteen-member U.N. Security Council and ratified by the U.N. General Assembly on February 1, 1946.

Lie, at the age of twenty-three, was appointed secretary in charge of administration of the Norwegian Labor Party. The socialist lawyer served as Minister of Justice until June 1939, when a Cabinet reorganization made him Minister of Commerce. In April 1945, Lie was chosen to head the Norwegian delegation to the United Nations Founding Conference at San Francisco. At the conference itself he was chosen chairman of Commission III which was charged with drafting the charter of the Security Council of the United Nations, "the organ...which would have the power to act against aggressors."

Dag Hammarskjold of Sweden was elected Secretary-general of the United Nations on April 7, 1953. At the age of thirty, Hammarskjold became Undersecretary of the Swedish Ministry of Finance. At the Ministry
he worked under the Fabian socialist economist Ernst Wigforss, whom he once said considered his second father. Sweden has long been the leading socialist state of Western Europe, taxing its citizens at a 75% rate.

U Thant of Burma was elected Secretary-general of the U.N. on November 30, 1962. According to Current Biography 1962, U Thant considered himself a democratic socialist.

Kurt Waldheim of Austria took office as Secretary-general of the United Nations on January 1, 1972. Waldheim had been Austria's U.N. ambassador from 1964 to 1968. When the Austrian Socialist party won the March 1970 elections, Waldheim again became Austria's U.N. representative. After serving two terms as U.N. Secretary-general, Waldheim became the head of Austria. It was revealed that Waldheim had lied about his role while serving in the Nazi forces of Adolf Hitler. Facts that were made known resulted in Waldheim being banished from the United States, even though he was the head of Austria.

Javier Perez de Cuellar became U.N. Secretary-general on December 15, 1981. In his address to the General Assembly after being sworn in, Perez de Cuellar called the disparity in wealth between rich and poor nations a violation of "the most fundamental human rights." During his administration, some third-world spokesmen complained that Perez de Cuellar had not been sufficiently outspoken in promoting the massive transfer of resources from rich to poor nations on a global scale (Wealth redistribution has always been the central plank in the platform of international socialism). "I am a third-world man," the Secretary-general replied. "But first of all I am a representative of 157 countries. I have to act in a way so that I am not only the representative of the third world."

read more:

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/un_doesnt_want_you_t...

Views: 599

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Disturbing,  but good info.

Get out of the UN and get the UN out of the country

Very Good job    ,Dee I rest my case. This is why we need to sever all ties with the UN and any of their branches such as NATO ! and not just sever all ties but to throw them the hell out of the United States. We need to Stand on our own Like we did once before when we were respected and Great  Souvern Nation. with individual treaties and trade agreements with individual nations we need to get back to that !!!

Mr. Dunlap, Very nice to find someone who does know what the UN and NATO is.

Thank You for your kind response , Mr. Jordan , i know you as well understand it as well and we really need to deal with it !.

Wow, I didn't know that, alot to absorb. Ok, very simple the UN is not our friend, Ron Paul was a champion on Get Us out of the UN and get the UN out of America.
If your auto has bad tires you don't change the windshield, no more time for distractions, America needs to get the hell out of the UN. No we don't need to be there to watch our enemies we need to just tell them don't tread on me or we will smoke you. Build our defense and a nuclear umbrella over America an thank God for the the past present and future prosperity.

God Bless America and the State of Israel

Live Free or Die

ALL of our presidents and top administration have known about this......and YET........they've done everything possible to keep us all in the dark.  And WHY isn't any of this in our history books?

Stay IN the UN and veto everything.

They do not all have veto POWER. We DO.

We can force them to run circles around themselves with our ONE VETO VOTE.

Hang on to that though Mrs. Dee, the issues with the UN is deep and very evil.

Communist are only the fake front of the luciferian elitists. The charter of the UN is the Russian soviet constitution. No rights except what they want to give you.

Lucifer was his angelic name before he rebelled, after God renamed him Satan meaning fallen. It's not a criticism just thought you might like to know. Lucifer was the most handsome or beautiful of all and God allowed him more wisdom and knowledge than all others.

How many know that there is a meditation room that was created by Madame Bablavsky who was a true Satanist. and most still adhere to the Luciferian society that was created by her.  The U>N is nothing but a front for NWO, and Anti Christian and Anti Israel......for which there is only one Scriptural character who fits that Persona Satan his self... Most persons don't have a clue what the U.N. is all about. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Lisa BensonPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

ALERT ALERT

CONFUSION:   Pelosi Says Constitution Spells Out ‘Two Co-Equal Branches’ Of Government

No Nancy. No.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must be taking night classes at the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez School of Government.

Pelosi, the 79-year-old third-highest ranking official in the U.S. government, was speaking to the Center for American Progress today when she mistakenly said there are “two co-equal branches” of government, before correcting herself to say there are three.

Watch:

“First of all, let me just say, we take an oath of office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” Pelosi said.

“Democrats take that oath seriously, and we are committed to honoring our oath of office. I’m not sure that our Republican colleagues share that commitment, and I’m not sure that the president of the United States does, too,” she claimed.

“So, in light of the fact that the beauty of the Constitution is a system of checks and balances— two co-equal branches— three co-equal branches of government,” she corrected with a laugh.

“A check and balance on each other,” she continued. “Con— Constitution spells out the pri— pa, uh, the duties of Congress and one of them is oversight of the president of the United States, another one of them is to impeach the president of the United States,” Pelosi said.

In November, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied supporters on Facebook to pitch in and help Democrats take back “all three chambers of Congress.”

“…the Progressive movement works and it wins in all districts…If we work our butts off to make sure that we take back all three chambers of Congress– three chambers of government…,” she said during the virtual appearance.

She clarified that she meant the “presidency, the Senate and the House.”

According to the Constitution, the three branches of government are the legislative, executive and judicial.

Below: Nancy Pelosi is continuing to promote the false narrative that President Trump is involved in a cover-up and therefore may be guilty of an impeachable offense. Millie Weaver joins Alex to break down the propaganda being used to overturn the democratic election of 2016 

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service