President Obama's act of folly and betrayal of Israel

Image result for obama stabs israel in the backPresident Obama yours was the unkindest abstention in the history of the US actions as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. Yesterday, in a deliberate act of retribution and in consort with four council members, two imperialist Islamic member states of the Organization of Islamic States, Malaysia and Senegal, New Zealand  and Venezuela, an ally of Iran, you abandoned the Jewish nation of Israel; this country's only democratic ally in the Middle East, Israel.

This act of infamy was given a standing ovation by all 14 members of the Security Council. The Palestinian representative declared it a "day of victory."

Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon demurred, calling it a "victory for terrorism."

History will mark your action as an ignominious faithless act of betrayal of your oath of office and long-standing friendship of America towards the Jewish nation of Israel. A nation that shares the foundational values of our country.

Your abstention and the vote of UN Security Council approving Resolution 2334 dismembers Israel's eternal capital of Jerusalem violating its existing right to negotiate just and secure borders.

Your act and that of the Security Council will not bring peace.
Instead it will inflame Islamic terrorism against our ally Israel.

read more:

http://linkis.com/newenglishreview.org/SONPB

Views: 426

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

He will answer to God someday

Soon, I hope.

Pleases Go Back To Africa Where You Belong.

IS ANYONE CONVINCED HE IS NOT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INSTEAD OF FOR THE ARAB STATES OF THE MIDDLE EAST

If ever there was a reason to throw this idiot in prison, this is it.

He has, throughout his presidency, favored the return to Israel's borders before the 6-day was in '67.

He does, in fact, hate Israel.

This was his last act of betrayal against our MOST important ally in the Middle East.

I am happy that Israel will not abide by this resolution, and have a question as well:

Why in the world does the UN feel that they can dictate policy in a sovereign country???

Oh, wait!  They have an exaggerated opinion of their own importance.

It seems we hate Obama the Palestinians, and the UN.  All one big disgusting package trying for their "One World Order" sorry Guys, two really Big Guys are going to be in charge, and they are neither,the type to hit people with their purse.   You'd better run for cover while you can, the Adults are getting ready to enter the room.

Without the MSM running interference for this muzzie-marxist-liberation theology piece of trash he couldn't run for dogcatcher without ridicule

I've said it once and will say it again. Three simple words!!!

HE'S A MUSLIM!!!!!

muslims HATE Israel and WILL DO WHAT EVER IS NECESSARY TO DESTROY HER, BUT GOD WILL PREVAIL!!!

COME ON JAN 20TH, ERASE EVERYTHING THAT MUSLIM MAGGOT DID

Amen!!!

"HUSSEIN O'BAMA"....AKA:  BARRY SOETORO/SOBARKHA......(OR WHATEVER THE HELL HIS REAL NAME IS ???).......HAS BEEN, ...CURRENTLY IS......AND ALWAYS WILL BE :  " AN AMERICA HATING, RACIST, LAWLESS, CORRUPT, ANTI CONSTITUTIONAL, RADICAL "MUSLIM POS"...FROM KENYA !!!!!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service