The information came back within 2 hours, as strange as it may sound, you know what here is the information. Attempt To Clone Jesus Underway, Despite strenuous objections from religious leaders and many people of faith from around the world, the Wyoming Institute of Technology plans on pushing forward with its controversial attempts to clone the reputed “Son of God”, Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

The genesis of the project started in 2012 when scientists at W.I.T. we’re contracted by the Vatican to aid in developing methods to preserve some of the churches most holy and potentially delicate relics. In the course of cataloging the relics scientists from W.I.T. became highly interested in the reputed “Lance of Longinus”: the spear used to pierce Jesus’ side by a Roman centurion as he hung crucified upon the cross. Small samples taken from the remnants of decorative tassels surrounding the head of the spear and wood from its haft were initially meant to aid in better understanding the precise preservation techniques needed. But an intrepid and curious researcher at W.I.T.’S applied sciences laboratory took it upon himself to attempt to extract and sequence DNA from the samples. Thanks to remarkable advances in genetic sequencing made over the last several years he was successful in isolating and extracting the DNA of what may very well be Jesus of Nazareth.

This DNA is unmistakably human, but does posses several small differences that have never before been seen. Several genes are present in the DNA extracted from the spear that do not exist in any other human, and their function is completely unknown. Scientists at W.I.T. feel that it is necessary to make a human clone utilizing this DNA so that observational data can be gathered regarding these new genetic markers.

Unfortunately the cloning of humans is currently prohibited by most nations of the world including the United States of America. But W.I.T. is excited to note that an agreement was made last December with the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea to host this potentially ground breaking project. An initial test batch of five embryonic clones has been created and are currently developing in host mothers. If they remain viable birth should occur no later than April of 2015.

The superstition surrounding this project has led to many threats of violence against researchers and workers at W.I.T’s facilities over the last three months. W.I.T. remains committed to morally guided, ethical based research- no matter what the cost. We will continue to function with the highest regard for human life and push for the advancement of science and the species. This project is a glowing example of the possible potential of the White House’s 2013 science advancement funding initiative. Without Federal grants and funding this project, and many others like it, would be impossible to do.

http://witscience.org/attempt-clone-jesus-underway/

http://www.sindone.info/BODA.PDF

If We Can't Clone Jesus By DNA, Why Not By Virtue- Forbes

This past summer I picked up Sean Murphy’s best-selling graphic novel, Punk Rock Jesus, which is a bit like The Truman Show meets Please Kill Me: Jesus is brought back as a clone, the subject of a wildly popular and controversial reality TV show, until the teenaged Chris bails on the whole enterprise to become the leader of a punk-rock band and all-around rebel.

Cloning Jesus has become a well-known trope for good reason. When things look dire, wouldn’t it be great to bring back Jesus himself—or maybe Abraham Lincoln!—to save us all? But of course a clone can never be the same as the original. Besides, that lets us off the hook too easily. We can’t wait around for someone else to fix things. We’re far better off bringing back these transformative figures by learning from and acting on their examples.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkluge/2013/12/24/why-we-should-clon...

 The Clone -ing Of Jesus Christ have they gone to far ?

Views: 380

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Will they create Christ or will they create a Christ they control, or maybe the can clone the Anti- Christ

         YOU HAVE VERY GOOD THOUGHT AND THEY FIT WITH MINE !!!!!  UP TO NO GOOD !!!!

Thank you Karma

I doubt that it is the original spear.

A lot of those relics were gathered long after Jesus was executed and there was doubt about the authenticity of them at the time of their collection.

Even if they collect the DNA, there's no other DNA to compare it to.

Hi Ralph,

 Hank told us they have the garment Christ was wearing the day he was crucified, and doubt now is it,  far beyond evidence that they are going clone Christ, unless people find a way to shut them down, They have been creating people, and maybe they think that they are a god now, who knows ?

I forgot about that.  The church never claimed it was the original, but, after all the testing done over the years, it looks more and more like it is.

But, your right, the cloning of people is a long way off and it would be wrong.

Trying to clone the son of God, ............... seems like they're just asking for trouble.

I think that God himself would have some say in that and I doubt it would be good news for those that are attempting it.

Yep, yes sir, but what is it they are trying to create a Anti Christ of some sort ?

The entire premise of this article is absurd.

The dead body of Jesus was not clothed in a garment. His body was wrapped in strips of cloth with various perfumes, and spices placed in the layers. In some cases up to 100 lbs of these spices and perfumes were used in burials. The head of the body was wrapped in a cloth like a napkin. Once all this wrapping was complete the body was prepared for the tomb.

The "Shroud of Turin" is not what clothed the body.

In addition Jesus was resurrected after three days and three nights in the tomb. He was entombed as a physical body and resurrected as a Spiritual body so that His physical body no longer existed having been changed to Spiritual. All of His former physical being was changed. All of it. Nothing physical was left to find, including blood on burial cloth or DNA on a spear.

As a Spirit Jesus can do anything. Even appear as a physical being, and He did so to His Disciples. In the Old Testament He even appeared humanly along with two angels, who also appeared as human, physical, beings to Abraham and his wife. The three even ate with Abraham. 

I am not a preacher and I don't pretend to be a "Biblical Scholar". I have read the Bible and continue to read it, along with historical accounts of Jewish customs that anybody can easily read for themselves.

The truth does not need to be embellished by religiosity of any brand or flavor. It stands on its own quite well.

My view of it.

Dale, other then your opinion, prove that this is not being done, because within their web site,  the Wyoming Institute of Technology, plans are moving forward to do just what is shared here.

Look. I gave my view of it. I really do not care what the Wyoming Institute of Technology has plans for, or that they are moving forward on doing what is featured in this article.

Man is known for creating gods. In my view this is but another attempt to do just that. They are going to clone the creator? Are you kidding me?

Common walking around the street sense is all it takes to blow this crap out of the water. Talk about foolishness. This beats all.

Mr. Dale Hearthman,

 The information is this, its illegal here in the USA to Clone Humans, but Democratic Party, People’s Republic of North Korea are.

 What they did, is found sample of DNA, stated in their report, the DNA found is different then any human DNA ever discovered.

 I agree its insane to even try to clone the Creator, it would be a abomination, to do so.

 Seeing how they can create life from blood or even old bones 10,000 years old or older, the concern is, what would they create if they do place the DNA that may be Christ into a embryo  and then place that into a host for a embryonic clone ?

But it is not the DNA of Christ. That simply no longer exists. So there is no may be possibility that His DNA is "found." It cannot be found.

As to the "Shroud of Turin."  Even though what it actually may be is an important curiosity, what is more important is what it is not. And that definitely would be the burial cloth used to cover the body of Christ.

Two monumental reasons why it is not, and there are many more as well.

One. Jesus was marred and disfigured more than any man, to the point that His own Mother could not recognize Him. He was savagely and brutally beaten beyond any recognizable appearance as to who he had formerly been. His face and features were totally disfigured by the brutal, tortuous beating he suffered resulting in a horrendous and agonizing tortuous death for all of mankind, including even those who administered it.

The only part of His body that wasn't broken were his bones. This method of human butchery and complete disfigurement was considered an art by the Romans.

Two. Not only does the Shroud indicate the recognizable features of a man, it is a man whose face is not disfigured beyond recognition, but it also indicates that he had long hair.

Jesus Christ did not have long hair. He said that it was a shame for a man to have long hair. Jesus was not a liar, nor was He a hypocrite.

This was God Himself, being butchered and put to death for us, so that the penalty for all of our sins might be paid in full, and that we might be forgiven for committing them.

Jesus Christ is on the Right Hand of His Father, and will come again to earth, not as a physical man, not as a clone of His former self, but as God in all of His Spiritual Glory, brighter than the sun in full strength, and that time is not far away.

We should be looking for that event rather than pursuing distractions of impossibilities, and marveling at willful ignorance.

My view.

 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

judicialwatch.org
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service