DNC Delegate Mary Bayer Reveals Democrat Hillary Clinton's True Plan to Ban Guns

Views: 562

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I am just worried that the night club attack will mislead the population to try and ban guns more intensely. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Robberies have gone down where conceal carry is legal. The criminals don't know who is carrying and is able to defend themselves.

Criminals and terrorist kill people and I doubt if that will ever happen.

So right you are, I think the best bible passage for what is taking place is Ecc 10:1-4 after reading that set back and think which side most people are on.

So, good, Skip!

10 Dead flies make the perfumer's ointment give off a stench;
    so a little folly outweighs wisdom and honor.
A wise man's heart inclines him to the right,
    but a fool's heart to the left.
Even when the fool walks on the road, he lacks sense,
    and he says to everyone that he is a fool.
If the anger of the ruler rises against you, do not leave your place,
    for calmness[a] will lay great offenses to rest.

I enjoy reading the Message bible. But you will want to read Ecc 10: 1-4 in the New American Standard bible it nails it just right!

OK, Skip, got it.  'Directs' in both instances. 'sense is lacking' and 'demonstrates to everyone that he is a fool.' 'temper arises against you, do not abandon your position, because composure allays great offenses."

and to support it: Eph. 6:10.

Thanks for the info jim , where can I find this for myself on the net ?

need more real journalists like this guy and Alex Jones to uncover all the corruption from the demonrats!

If anyone were to read the Constitution, they might note that the 2nd Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear arms.  Additionally, Article V defines the methods by which the Constitution can be changed.  Nowhere in my reading does it state that the president, congress or the supreme court, can arbitrarily change the Constitution. Yes, the supreme court has made a mockery of the Constitution, and congress has elected to enforce only those rules they wish, while the president just ignores all of it.   

I offer that an Article V  Convention of the States is necessary and we need to contact our respective Legislators with that demand.  The failure I recognize is the failure of the people to make known their opposition to the Progressives march towards a socialist/communist rule.  Remember Benjamin Franklin comment: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty or Safety".  When we write to each other and do nothing else we have basically done nothing.  We can state, "I will do this or I will do that", but you and I both know we will do neither "this or that". 

Contact you STATE Legislatures and demand they further a COS.   It is time to make the cliche' "of the people, by the people and for the people" a reality.  Note; I don't really care about the order of the cliche', I only care about the content.      

The only and best Gun legislation has already been written. It's call the 2nd Amendment. Anything else is a act of treason toward our Constitution.

It is sad that some people don't care about Constitutional rights and that they have such a big voice in the government that we have to be so vigilant.  They will never accept the fact that making good people helpless does not make bad people harmless.  What is really sad is that the very people calling for firearms confiscation are people that are protected by the very firearms they want to get rid of. 

Someone better put a round or two in the Left or they will rule America permanently, forever. Notice who was at the first day of the DNC convention, yes it progressive base. And who exactly are they? Look no further than it's entertainment industry, the progressive Jewish Hollywood elites. That's who now control the country. Obama is just one of it's many many tools that have been invited into it's criminal control freak party. They are the county's most wealthy, most powerful now days. In their minds Trump can never hold power over them, never again will they allow someone to take the power back.




Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

(TeaParty.org) – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...

Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service