At a reception held on October 22, 2015 to honor the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, the UN Secretary General's Special Representative for International Migration, Peter Sutherland, claimed that caps on refugees enforced by certain countries in Europe are “directly reminiscent of the type of caps that took place under the Reich [against] the Jewish population.”  This outrageous comparison of good faith attempts to control the tide of mass migration from the Middle East, North Africa and Afghanistan to the plight of Jews during the Holocaust is aimed at browbeating European countries into putting their own citizens in danger to serve a globalist agenda.

Make no mistake about Sutherland‘s intentions. He is not really focused on saving persecuted religious minorities from the Muslim majority countries in conflict-ridden regions, particularly persecuted Christians and Yazidis. He advocates an open border policy in which migrants leaving their countries of origin to seek better economic conditions would have essentially the same right to settle in their destination countries of choice as persecuted refugees seeking political asylum:

"What are economic migrants, I ask? Are they everybody else who isn’t persecuted? Well if that is what they are, does it mean that you’re going to send home people who are starving? That you’re going to send home people who are living through environmental degradation of a dreadful kind? …It’s just not good enough."

Sutherland has no way of knowing the motivations of the many hundreds of thousands (and possibly millions eventually) of migrants from Muslim majority countries flooding Europe, let alone who they really are. He ignores legitimate concerns regarding infiltration by members of the Islamic State and other jihadists. What we are witnessing is in part a genuine humanitarian crisis and in part a Hijrah, or “jihad by emigration,” as Robert Spencer calls it. The Islamic State has made no secret of its intention to flood Europe with hundreds of thousands of its jihadists posing as refugees. Some Islamic State jihadists have already been caught crossing into Europe doing just that. Without proper vetting and border controls, the jihadists will succeed in exploiting humanitarian outreach to accomplish their Hijrah, with potentially catastrophic results for the West. 

read more:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/260584/un-officials-mock-national-s...

Views: 621

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

UN=UN AMERICAN

Hang a few thousand of them and the rest will straighten out.  The UN is usless and should be defunded.

Steve, while I parallel your ideas, most of the time, I believe you could string up a million terrorists and they will still be lining up to behead, burn and commit dismemberment.  I worked in the Middle East (Egypt, Iran and Pakistan) and I lived with the Islamic families, who, privately, are against the militant Islamics, but, publicly, if they spoke out, without Imam backing, they would likely be beheaded.

For over 21 Centuries, Christians have been hunted, killed and mutilated by the Romans, Egyptians, Ottomans, Palestinians, etc..  The war between Jihadist Muslims and Jews has been going on since the 8th century.  It is a cultural problem and westerners cannot understand the hate that has developed between the two religions.  There has never been democracy in the Middle East, and there never will be.  All we can do is contain them... We can destroy the majority of ISIS but we will never defeat a 1500 year idea.  The Jihadists believe all the BS that they have been fed since they were 3 years old and that will never change.

Have you ever wondered why a well educated, nice looking, white, free woman would fall for an Islamic man she knows is Muslim and believes in Sharia Law.  This confounds me.

V'kat ... beautifully said, sir (?) ... ma'am (?) ...
If one percent of the 1.4 or so billion Muslims on the planet are jihadis that's about 14-million potential murderers ... if they were all in one place we could kill them all but they're not so, you're right -- wiping them out is next to impossible by the methods we've employed thus far in this ancient struggle.
But what we could do -- if we had an 'America-First' President & Congress -- is isolate the entire Muslim world economically & physically ... cut off all means of earning money & controlling ingress/egress to their regions by strategically stationing troops-ships-aircraft along their shipping/transit lines and enforcing a nothing/no one in or out policy with massive over force at any violation of the embargo. Within just a few years the vassals in these feudal states/tribal groups would be separated from their perqs & privileges and they'd overthrow the theocracies ... we can foment widespread civil wars from which these primitives can never recover.
We can't defeat these savages by gentlemanly strife ... we out-savage them ... then we win.
We can make peace with our consciences later.

or nuke the shit heads

Not only defunded totally by America but removed from this country all together.

UN wants to remove all borders and allow anyone travel to any country and that county must clothe, feed and house them forever. One world government, one world religion. They knew that they had to dismantle the United States to make this a reality and Obama was their useful idiot.

The day they or anyone tries that, I will build an army and take them down. Those that survive will be tried and (assuming the are found guilty) will be hung. Then the UN building will be razed to the ground and turned into a park memorial to liberty.

SA1776 III

UN is Satan's politics (read New World Order) and Islam is Satan's religion. To hell with both of them. I wish our Military would just take out the UN Building in NYC, preferably when it was full of UN policy makers and Arab filled chambers.

.

Reform-2

What the Democrats want is every white,Jew,Christian to be dead
what does the Bible say about the New world order

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Chip Bok

ALERT ALERT

LOOK: Obama Declared National Emergencies 13 Times Including Swine Flu, Iran And Flint Water Crisis

President Trump is expected to declare a State of Emergency at the US southern border on Friday.

Declaring the immigration crisis a national emergency is overdue. Presidents have declared national emergencies for nearly 50 years.

4

Barack Obama declared 13 national emergencies, 11 of which continue to this day. The Obama emergencies included the Swine Flu, Flint water crisis and Iran.

The Conservative Tribune reported:

As it turns out, there are currently 31 ongoing national emergencies over which the president wields certain authorities, the first of which has been in existence since 1979 and is one of only two emergencies declared by Carter.

There were a total of six national emergencies during former President Ronald Reagan’s tenure, as well as four more during the administration of former President George H.W. Bush, all of which have ended.

Former President Bill Clinton declared 17 national emergencies — six of which remain in effect — while former President George W. Bush declared 12 national emergencies, of which 10 remain ongoing.

Then we get to former President Barack Obama, who declared 13 national emergencies, 11 of which continue to this day. Thus far, President Trump has declared three active and ongoing national emergencies.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service