At a reception held on October 22, 2015 to honor the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, the UN Secretary General's Special Representative for International Migration, Peter Sutherland, claimed that caps on refugees enforced by certain countries in Europe are “directly reminiscent of the type of caps that took place under the Reich [against] the Jewish population.”  This outrageous comparison of good faith attempts to control the tide of mass migration from the Middle East, North Africa and Afghanistan to the plight of Jews during the Holocaust is aimed at browbeating European countries into putting their own citizens in danger to serve a globalist agenda.

Make no mistake about Sutherland‘s intentions. He is not really focused on saving persecuted religious minorities from the Muslim majority countries in conflict-ridden regions, particularly persecuted Christians and Yazidis. He advocates an open border policy in which migrants leaving their countries of origin to seek better economic conditions would have essentially the same right to settle in their destination countries of choice as persecuted refugees seeking political asylum:

"What are economic migrants, I ask? Are they everybody else who isn’t persecuted? Well if that is what they are, does it mean that you’re going to send home people who are starving? That you’re going to send home people who are living through environmental degradation of a dreadful kind? …It’s just not good enough."

Sutherland has no way of knowing the motivations of the many hundreds of thousands (and possibly millions eventually) of migrants from Muslim majority countries flooding Europe, let alone who they really are. He ignores legitimate concerns regarding infiltration by members of the Islamic State and other jihadists. What we are witnessing is in part a genuine humanitarian crisis and in part a Hijrah, or “jihad by emigration,” as Robert Spencer calls it. The Islamic State has made no secret of its intention to flood Europe with hundreds of thousands of its jihadists posing as refugees. Some Islamic State jihadists have already been caught crossing into Europe doing just that. Without proper vetting and border controls, the jihadists will succeed in exploiting humanitarian outreach to accomplish their Hijrah, with potentially catastrophic results for the West. 

read more:

Views: 673

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


Hang a few thousand of them and the rest will straighten out.  The UN is usless and should be defunded.

Steve, while I parallel your ideas, most of the time, I believe you could string up a million terrorists and they will still be lining up to behead, burn and commit dismemberment.  I worked in the Middle East (Egypt, Iran and Pakistan) and I lived with the Islamic families, who, privately, are against the militant Islamics, but, publicly, if they spoke out, without Imam backing, they would likely be beheaded.

For over 21 Centuries, Christians have been hunted, killed and mutilated by the Romans, Egyptians, Ottomans, Palestinians, etc..  The war between Jihadist Muslims and Jews has been going on since the 8th century.  It is a cultural problem and westerners cannot understand the hate that has developed between the two religions.  There has never been democracy in the Middle East, and there never will be.  All we can do is contain them... We can destroy the majority of ISIS but we will never defeat a 1500 year idea.  The Jihadists believe all the BS that they have been fed since they were 3 years old and that will never change.

Have you ever wondered why a well educated, nice looking, white, free woman would fall for an Islamic man she knows is Muslim and believes in Sharia Law.  This confounds me.

V'kat ... beautifully said, sir (?) ... ma'am (?) ...
If one percent of the 1.4 or so billion Muslims on the planet are jihadis that's about 14-million potential murderers ... if they were all in one place we could kill them all but they're not so, you're right -- wiping them out is next to impossible by the methods we've employed thus far in this ancient struggle.
But what we could do -- if we had an 'America-First' President & Congress -- is isolate the entire Muslim world economically & physically ... cut off all means of earning money & controlling ingress/egress to their regions by strategically stationing troops-ships-aircraft along their shipping/transit lines and enforcing a nothing/no one in or out policy with massive over force at any violation of the embargo. Within just a few years the vassals in these feudal states/tribal groups would be separated from their perqs & privileges and they'd overthrow the theocracies ... we can foment widespread civil wars from which these primitives can never recover.
We can't defeat these savages by gentlemanly strife ... we out-savage them ... then we win.
We can make peace with our consciences later.

or nuke the shit heads

Not only defunded totally by America but removed from this country all together.

UN wants to remove all borders and allow anyone travel to any country and that county must clothe, feed and house them forever. One world government, one world religion. They knew that they had to dismantle the United States to make this a reality and Obama was their useful idiot.

The day they or anyone tries that, I will build an army and take them down. Those that survive will be tried and (assuming the are found guilty) will be hung. Then the UN building will be razed to the ground and turned into a park memorial to liberty.

SA1776 III

UN is Satan's politics (read New World Order) and Islam is Satan's religion. To hell with both of them. I wish our Military would just take out the UN Building in NYC, preferably when it was full of UN policy makers and Arab filled chambers.



What the Democrats want is every white,Jew,Christian to be dead
what does the Bible say about the New world order




Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Mike Lester


Democrat Disaster! 53% Of Black Voters, 60% Of Other Minorities Say Liberal Media Trying To Help Democrats Impeach Trump

Thanks to President Donald Trump ALL Americans now know the mainstream fake-news media is an extension of the Democrat Party.

In a recent poll a majority of black voters and minority voters say the media is trying to help Democrats impeach President Trump.

And half of FOX News too, by the way.

CNS News reported:

Both black voters and other minority voters are more convinced than white voters that most reporters are trying to help impeach President Donald Trump, rather than report the news fairly – with a majority of each of the three groups holding that view – a new Rasmussen Reports survey reveals.

In the national voter survey, conducted November 12-13, 53% of all voters said most reporters are trying to help impeach Trump:

“When they write or talk about the impeachment effort, are most reporters trying to help impeach President Trump or block his impeachment? Or are most reporters simply interested in reporting the news in an unbiased manner?”:

“Help impeach President Trump”: 53%
“Block his impeachment”: 8%
Report “news in an unbiased an unbiased manner”: 32%

But, 53% of black voters and 60% of other minorities, compared to 51% of whites, said reporters are trying to get Trump rather than report the news fairly.

Tucker: 'Star' witnesses couldn't point to any high-crimes

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service