At a reception held on October 22, 2015 to honor the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, the UN Secretary General's Special Representative for International Migration, Peter Sutherland, claimed that caps on refugees enforced by certain countries in Europe are “directly reminiscent of the type of caps that took place under the Reich [against] the Jewish population.”  This outrageous comparison of good faith attempts to control the tide of mass migration from the Middle East, North Africa and Afghanistan to the plight of Jews during the Holocaust is aimed at browbeating European countries into putting their own citizens in danger to serve a globalist agenda.

Make no mistake about Sutherland‘s intentions. He is not really focused on saving persecuted religious minorities from the Muslim majority countries in conflict-ridden regions, particularly persecuted Christians and Yazidis. He advocates an open border policy in which migrants leaving their countries of origin to seek better economic conditions would have essentially the same right to settle in their destination countries of choice as persecuted refugees seeking political asylum:

"What are economic migrants, I ask? Are they everybody else who isn’t persecuted? Well if that is what they are, does it mean that you’re going to send home people who are starving? That you’re going to send home people who are living through environmental degradation of a dreadful kind? …It’s just not good enough."

Sutherland has no way of knowing the motivations of the many hundreds of thousands (and possibly millions eventually) of migrants from Muslim majority countries flooding Europe, let alone who they really are. He ignores legitimate concerns regarding infiltration by members of the Islamic State and other jihadists. What we are witnessing is in part a genuine humanitarian crisis and in part a Hijrah, or “jihad by emigration,” as Robert Spencer calls it. The Islamic State has made no secret of its intention to flood Europe with hundreds of thousands of its jihadists posing as refugees. Some Islamic State jihadists have already been caught crossing into Europe doing just that. Without proper vetting and border controls, the jihadists will succeed in exploiting humanitarian outreach to accomplish their Hijrah, with potentially catastrophic results for the West. 

read more:

Views: 686

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


Hang a few thousand of them and the rest will straighten out.  The UN is usless and should be defunded.

Steve, while I parallel your ideas, most of the time, I believe you could string up a million terrorists and they will still be lining up to behead, burn and commit dismemberment.  I worked in the Middle East (Egypt, Iran and Pakistan) and I lived with the Islamic families, who, privately, are against the militant Islamics, but, publicly, if they spoke out, without Imam backing, they would likely be beheaded.

For over 21 Centuries, Christians have been hunted, killed and mutilated by the Romans, Egyptians, Ottomans, Palestinians, etc..  The war between Jihadist Muslims and Jews has been going on since the 8th century.  It is a cultural problem and westerners cannot understand the hate that has developed between the two religions.  There has never been democracy in the Middle East, and there never will be.  All we can do is contain them... We can destroy the majority of ISIS but we will never defeat a 1500 year idea.  The Jihadists believe all the BS that they have been fed since they were 3 years old and that will never change.

Have you ever wondered why a well educated, nice looking, white, free woman would fall for an Islamic man she knows is Muslim and believes in Sharia Law.  This confounds me.

V'kat ... beautifully said, sir (?) ... ma'am (?) ...
If one percent of the 1.4 or so billion Muslims on the planet are jihadis that's about 14-million potential murderers ... if they were all in one place we could kill them all but they're not so, you're right -- wiping them out is next to impossible by the methods we've employed thus far in this ancient struggle.
But what we could do -- if we had an 'America-First' President & Congress -- is isolate the entire Muslim world economically & physically ... cut off all means of earning money & controlling ingress/egress to their regions by strategically stationing troops-ships-aircraft along their shipping/transit lines and enforcing a nothing/no one in or out policy with massive over force at any violation of the embargo. Within just a few years the vassals in these feudal states/tribal groups would be separated from their perqs & privileges and they'd overthrow the theocracies ... we can foment widespread civil wars from which these primitives can never recover.
We can't defeat these savages by gentlemanly strife ... we out-savage them ... then we win.
We can make peace with our consciences later.

or nuke the shit heads

Not only defunded totally by America but removed from this country all together.

UN wants to remove all borders and allow anyone travel to any country and that county must clothe, feed and house them forever. One world government, one world religion. They knew that they had to dismantle the United States to make this a reality and Obama was their useful idiot.

The day they or anyone tries that, I will build an army and take them down. Those that survive will be tried and (assuming the are found guilty) will be hung. Then the UN building will be razed to the ground and turned into a park memorial to liberty.

SA1776 III

UN is Satan's politics (read New World Order) and Islam is Satan's religion. To hell with both of them. I wish our Military would just take out the UN Building in NYC, preferably when it was full of UN policy makers and Arab filled chambers.



What the Democrats want is every white,Jew,Christian to be dead
what does the Bible say about the New world order




Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson


Joe Biden Talks To The Dead: – He Worked On Paris Climate Deal With Long-Dead Chinese Leader

Former Vice President Joe Biden mistakenly claimed on Monday that he worked on the Paris Climate Accord with former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping — who died more than 20 years before its signing.

Zach Parkinson  

Joe Biden claimed tonight that he worked with Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping on the Paris Climate Accord.

Except the current Chinese President is Xi Jinping.

Deng Xiapoing left office in 1992 and has been dead for 23 years.

Biden made the gaffe while citing his accomplishments in President Barack Obama’s administration.

“One of the things I’m proudest of is getting passed, getting moved, getting in control of the Paris Climate Accord,” Biden said in a speech at the College of Charleston. “I’m the guy who came back after meeting with Deng Xiaoping and making the case that I believe China will join if we put pressure on them. We got almost 200 nations to join.”

Xiaoping served as the leader of China from 1978 until his retirement in 1992, and passed away in 1997. Xi Jinping, China’s current president, came to power 2013 and signed the country onto the 2016 agreement.

In June 2017, President Trump announced that the U.S. would withdraw from the agreement, stating that accord will “undermine the economy” and “puts [the United States] at a permanent disadvantage.”

In addition to the Xiaoping gaffe, Biden bizarrely declared in a campaign speech that he is a “candidate for the United States Senate” and that people could “vote for the other Biden” if they prefer one of his rivals.

“My name is Joe Biden. I’m a Democratic candidate for the United States Senate. Look me over, if you like what you see, help out. If not, vote for the other Biden,” the 77-year-old said at the First in the South Dinner.

Biden’s confusing comments come as Democrat primary candidates are scheduled to debate in Charleston Tuesday evening. The former vice president faces increasing pressure to give a standout performance as his “firewall” in the Palmetto State crumbles in the face of a surging Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). The Vermont senator is fresh off a decisive victory in Nevada caucuses on Saturday. Earlier this month, he placed first the New Hampshire primary and won the popular vote in Iowa. In a survey released Monday, the Public Policy Polling outfit said Biden leads South Carolina with 36 percent of support and Sanders is in second at 21 percent.

Hannity: Bernie's beyond gross article

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service