Coverup: Federal Appeals Court Blasts DOJ Misconduct in Police Prosecution

A federal appeals court has blasted misconduct by Justice Department lawyers in a civil rights prosecution against New Orleans police officers. The case arose in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s grant of a new trial because Justice Department lawyers — including those responsible for protecting the civil rights of the defendant police officers — engaged in an anonymous blogging campaign to taint the defendants during the trial. The court noted that Justice Department lawyers stoked a “mob mentality” against police officers.

The federal appeals court took note that one of the Civil Rights Division lawyers responsible appears to have gone unpunished.  For sure, one lawyer is still employed and earning in excess of $157,000 per year with her government salary and benefits.

As the court described:

In the anarchy following Hurricane Katrina, a group of heavily armed New Orleans police officers were dispatched to the Danziger Bridge in response to an emergency call reporting shots being fired at police. There, amid chaos, they shot and killed two unarmed men, one of them developmentally disabled, and wounded four other unarmed civilians.

The notorious Civil Rights Division then brought a criminal prosecution against the police officers (just as many are now clamoring for the same DOJ unit to launch such prosecution against other police departments). The federal appeals court described what happened next:

No less than three high-ranking federal prosecutors are known to have been posting online,anonymous comments to newspaper articles about the case throughout its duration. The government makes no attempt to justify the prosecutors’ ethical lapses, which the court described as having created an “online 21st century carnival atmosphere.” Not only that, but the governmentinadequately investigated and substantially delayed the ferreting out of information about its in-house contributors to the anonymous postings. The district court also found that cooperating defendants called to testify by the government lied, an FBI agent over stepped, defense witnesses were intimidated from testifying , and inexplicably gross sentencing disparities resulted from the government’ s plea bargains and charging practices.

Read the full outrageous opinion here.

The exact same Justice Department unit which engaged in this misconduct is also investigating police departments across the nation — including in Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore.

read more:

http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2015/08/19/coverup-federal-appea...

Views: 473

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I must have missed something here. The police shot unarmed people on a bridge? They don't want the police to be prosecuted for the crime of killing unarmed citizens? What have I missed here? Or, do they want to prosecute but the DOJ won't allow it? I'm confused!

"In the anarchy following Hurricane Katrina, a group of heavily armed New Orleans police officers were dispatched to the Danziger Bridge in response to an emergency call reporting shots being fired at police. There, amid chaos, they shot and killed two unarmed men, one of them developmentally disabled, and wounded four other unarmed civilians."

Is this about internet 'Postings' or the shooting of unarmed citizens?

Okay, after research I found that the officers were sent to the bridge by one call by an unnamed officer at the bridge stating that there was gun fire... which was stated in another article that gun fire was made to attract attention of rescuers in the area.

The officers that were sent were armed to the teeth and ready to kill what ever was on that bridge... and they did... AK 47's and assault rifles were used by lining up across the bridge and opening fire! They were rightfully convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree of two and the shooting and wounding of four others.

A cover up of these actions had been attempted by prosecutors and others which came into the picture later and was found which has nothing to do with the valid prosecution of the police actions... on goes the circus of coverup and investagations ad nosium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danziger_Bridge_shootings


Another article I found that was interesting and should be known by all citizens...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_(law)

"anonymous comments" This would stop if the sites required you use a title attached to your face book page. When I read a posting and the user has no name , no picture or any ID as to who they really are, I dismiss the post. If they can't ID them selves then their words should also be dismissed.  The Obama admin has created many jobs by paying these trolls to post on conservative wed sites.

So what?  The Executive Branch is positively unconcerned about either the Judicial or Legislative Branches, the Constitution or the Laws.  What is anyone going to do about it?

In my mind anyone contemplating a career in law enforcement should take a good hard look at

their decesion.     If I were a cop it would be a cold day in hell before I would venture into certain

neighborhoods  and I definetly not go into many of them.     The people demenstrating agains

the policd will get the police protection they seed and deserve.   I seem to rec all groupls of 1880s

citizens in Montana taking care of their problem themselves

 

I am truly sorry folks but this is just the way the Obama department of Justice rolls.  Research it.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Steve Kelley

ALERT ALERT

The Fall Of Fake News!! Quiet Shake-Up At MSNBC After Station Hemorrhages Viewers Following Mueller Debacle 

Reports are surfacing about a quiet shake-up of personnel at MSNBC after the cable news station lost more than 30% of their audience after the Mueller debacle.

Apparently MNSBC doesn’t think their financial woes are newsworthy given that they didn’t run any breathless stories about their own failings.

News of MSNBC’s collapse can’t come as a surprise to insiders who undoubtedly are fully aware that their audience no longer trusts them.

One source familiar told Mediaite the changes came amidst mounting complaints from NBC News chief Andy Lack about a dip in MSNBC’s ratings following the end of the Mueller investigation. In May, ratings for the network in the advertiser coveted 25-54 demo were down 32% year over year.

MSNBC viewers were asked: How much do you agree that MSNBC regularly reports made up or fake news about Donald Trump and his administration?

The responses were devastating! While 35% or respondents agree that MSNBC pushes Fake News, only 24% disagreed. That’s a ratings death sentence!

What do you expect from a channel that boasts disgraced liar, Brian Williams, and race pimp, Al Sharpton?

Bright Start News@BRIGHTstrt
 

MAJOR SHAKEUP AT MSNBC - Ratings crater after Mueller Report Debacle! 

MSNBC Shakeup: Jonathan Wald and Dan Arnall Take Dayside

MSNBC quietly implemented a sweeping shakeup in programming this week, Mediaite has learned, appointing SVP of programming and development Jonathan Wald and MSNBC executive editor Dan Arnall to lead...

Flashback: MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow’s Ratings Plummet To Yearly Low

MSNBC primetime host Rachel Maddow brought in her worst weekly ratings of the year last week.

Her show last week averaged 2,324,000 viewers, with an average audience of 337,000 in the 25-54 age demographic, both of which mark yearly lows for the liberal television host, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Maddow first saw a dramatic drop in ratings following the conclusion of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. Her previous low for a week in 2019 was the last week in March, the first full week after Mueller submitted his conclusion to Attorney General William Barr, where she averaged 2,458,000 viewers with 392,000 in the demo.

She spent two years dissecting every aspect of the special counsel’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump conspired with the Russians to win the 2016 presidential election. The night Mueller submitted his findings to Barr, Maddow appeared to hold back tears over the fact that neither the president nor any family members were indicted.

Compared to Maddow’s low ratings last week, Fox News’ Sean Hannity, whose program is often the most-watched among all cable news shows, averaged 3,108,000 viewers with just under half-a-million viewers in the key demographic.

She also nearly tripled CNN’s Chris Cuomo’s weekly ratings. His program only had 880,000 viewers with 225,000 in the key demo.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service