After Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare, Texas Congressman Introduces Bill Aimed Directly at Justices

Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas) responded to a Supreme Court decision upholding a key Obamacare provision Thursday by introducing a bill in the House that would require each of the justices to enroll in the controversial health care program.

“As the Supreme Court continues to ignore the letter of the law, it’s important that these six individuals understand the full impact of their decisions on the American people,” Babin said in a statement.

Rep. Brian Babin (Image source: Facebook)

“That’s why I introduced the SCOTUScare Act to require the Supreme Court and all of its employees to sign up for Obamacare,” the Texas congressman added. “By eliminating their exemption from Obamacare, they will see firsthand what the American people are forced to live with!”

“[T]hey will see firsthand what the American people are forced to live with!”

President Barack Obama’s controversial health law survived it’s second Supreme Court challenge Thursday when the court upheld its nationwide tax subsides in a 6-3 decision.

Critics immediately skewered the court for the decision, many citing Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissenting opinion to contend the court had become politicized.

read more here: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/06/25/after-supreme-court-upho...?

Views: 675

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Its is only fair that all in government use the same health care that they passed.  It should be this way for all laws.  As it is said to be.

POLITICIZED HELL!!!, THEY ARE JUST BOUGHT AND PAID FOR CLOWN PUPPETS, DANCING ON THE N.W.O. STRINGS.

Great Idea, and there is no reason for any of our elected officials to vote against this.

I agee they should ALL have to live with the same laws as they force on the public!

Equal protection under the law!

Yes, but some animals are more equal than others.

ALL government employees MUST live under the laws that they make for the rest of us!!  It is only fair, as there is no one better than anyone else in this country!!!  They might be better off, but not better than!!!!.  

Agree whole-heartedly with you, Norman!

Wake the hell up America. If this passes who would enforce it? The court has ruled against Obama immigration policy and he continues to ignore it and nothing is being done about it. When this administration called us Cowards-Stupid and Lazy it was a insult at the time. After seeing Americans reaction to Obama policies I agree with these people. Americans wear these signs proudly.

God bless Brian Babin.

He did not aim high enough... He should propose a host of Articles of Impeachment... his bill is nothing but symbolic and even if passed the Court would ignore it... then what?  Those 5 Justices that found this new liberty in the 14th Amendment need to be IMPEACHED ASAP ... removed from the Court and disbarred... for GROSS BAD BEHAVIOR.  See Article 3, Section 1, Clause 1 of the US Constitution for the power Congress has to remove these judges.

And I don't want to here that Obama will send 5 more ... because Congress needs to turn down every nominee that doesn't fit the judicial philosophy our forefather's expected justices too maintain... .

Are you convinced your freedoms are gone? Are you ready to capitulate? Are you going to lay down now and just shut up? 

All your ranting and raving, voting, faxes, phone calls, letters and presence at town hall has done ZERO... NOTHING! 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Al Goodwyn

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service