Sarah Palin, Will She Run For President?

Sarah Palin, a very strong Conservative, may decide to run, she has a very strong following. There is only one Sarah and the libs are scared to death of her, sort of like they were of President Reagan, I remember all the b. s. they were mouthing. They know she is formidable, she can raise a half dead audience to their feet cheering.


She said a candidate like Hillary is no obstacle at all.


I know she would bring this country back from the abyss BHO and company has taken us to, bring back our military strength and regain our once held respect in the world, she would renew our relationship with our allies and be formidable to our enemies, we would return to the Constitution and the Rule of law, as set by our Founders, the countless executive orders would be examined for elimination and that damnable Obamacare would see the kiss of dearth…


Now there is a woman. She has the qualities of a Margaret Thatcher. The question is will she throw her hat in the ring, I hope she will in spite of foul mouthed addlebrained liberals who know she is capable of sweeping the floor with them, like an iron lady

Views: 1187

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sarah Palin surely does set the standard by which anyone else must be measured -- including the amount of vitriol resulting from her existence intersecting with the excrescences known as, among other things, liberal.  You know, the old saw about the more nastiness they toss at the fan the more likely it is there is someone or something worthwhile upsetting them?   However, she is a human being with a family that will be hammered on in the media (if not in reality) and that is one consideration.  The other is -- is she more valuable running for/serving as President of the United States, or as a private citizen, conservative voice extraordinaire?  And what does God have in mind for her, and for us?  //  I did the attached at the time the Town Crier poll results were announced.  Slightly different version of Run, Sarah, Run! 


You are right, it's in God's hands, but I would be thrilled to see her run, unshackled, completely free from restrictions. When she was with McCain he controlled everything she said. McCain was and is an idiot. If the names were reversed on that ticket she would have won, McCain was to busy telling everybody what a great guy Obama was and that, should he win, he would make a great president, I damn near fell out of my chair. McCain had the audience yawning, Sarah had them cheering.

I wrote this article that fits well with this item!!!!!

Extremely well done, well thought out, garnering attention and worthy of reading..

There are so many now that have thrown their hats in the conservative ring, it's hard to say. I'm thinking yes. Her constructive criticism and factual truth's would definitely destroy Hillary Clinton as being the first woman president. Even if Sarah Palin didn't win, nether would Hillary. Just my 2 cents.

Yes, there are quite a few but look at them, how many have real executive experience, how many have experience in foreign affairs? How many have had the responsibility of missile deployment the way Sarah did? How many have the kind of clearance that she had? How many have taken on the existing powers, made a mockery of them and defeated them as she has done? You will find that there are possibly none. We’ve seen what a no-record senator like BHO can do, how he was never vetted, how the Congress coward because they were to afraid to uphold the law for fear of being called racist, they wouldn’t join the Sheriff of Arizona and stand with him in his findings that would have called for Obama’s impeachment. This country has gone damn near to hell, not just by and through the ,Trojan Horse, Obama, but our miserable congress as well.


If Mrs. Palin where to run for office, I would vote for her.

You and countless others.

If Sarah Palin runs.......she has my vote!

I think the world of Sarah Palin, from when she was selected to be McCain's running mate.  However, she's toting a whole lot of baggage, what with some of the things her children have done, or said to have done.  I believe she'd be kept busy trying to put out little wildfires all over the place.  I believe she would make an excellent President, but just don't think she could overcome the negatives that I guarantee you will be out there.

She already has overcome everything that the idiotic left has throne at her, name anyone with more honesty and integrity than she ?  And if she is elected she will have a lot of GOOD  people at her side, something the liberal candidate will not be privy to !

You are so right, lets make it happen, the Tea Party must seek her out to run, win and fight to save this country, or our children will have nothing but big government in their face their entire lives. Look at the number of things that people use to do and take for granted, freedoms, LOST. We can’t continue or our Constitution will be useless.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service