(Washington Examiner) - President Obama, who has hammered Republicans repeatedly for lacking an alternative to his most controversial policies, now finds himself in a similar predicament: He has no plan B if the courts invalidate his executive action on immigration.

The White House is now putting all its efforts into getting an emergency stay on a Texas federal judge’s order temporarily blocking Obama’s unilateral push to shield up to 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation.

Obama wants his immigration plan to proceed while judges weigh a broader appeal by his administration to the ruling by U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen, which upended a centerpiece of his second-term agenda.

Beyond those legal maneuverings, however, the White House has no fallback plan for how to move past a possible legal defeat that may be coming, according to court observers.

Multiple White House officials were unable to provide the Washington Examiner with a contingency strategy for how they would grant the type of deportation relief long demanded by immigration activists if the courts block Obama’s current blueprint.

However, senior aides did their best to offer some level of comfort to undocumented immigrants on edge amid the legal turmoil.

- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/obama-backup-plan-immigration-84928/#sthash...

Views: 327

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

BHO Rushing to finalize fed contracts to process illegals

The Court has placed an injunction on such work... expenditure of government funds without statutory and budgetary authority is a felony. Any agent of the government knowingly spending or authorizing the expenditure of government funds without proper authority... appropriations authority... should be PROSECUTED for misappropriation of government funds.

The power of the Purse is worthless.... if there is no enforcement.  Without serious prosecution and penalties for spending government funds, not authorized by Act of Congress, the power of the purse is useless window dressing.  It is getting ridiculous .... does anyone obey the law today?  Civil Servants... beware... knowingly exceeding and or spending government funds on functions not authorized by Congress is illegal and may be a felony offense.


How about the novel approach of 'enforcement' of the law as his back up plan.  The President doesn't need a backup plan when it comes to immigration and dealing with illegal liens. Enforce the law and our borders... simple enough.


This will not deter obummer from destroying America and hard working American Patriots.

Obamas business as usual.

He never did, his sole plan was to just have voter's , he is wanting the numbers, He could care less about the people who are here illegally , it about numbers.

Why does he need a back-up... the United States already has a plan to handle legal Immigration and too deal with illegal aliens.  How about following the law... that is a plan.

Why would a "president" who hates America, hates the Consitution and the rule of law follow the law?  This man is criminal from the word go.  He should be dealt with under our system as such!

The DNC is a criminal enterprise.

You have hit the nail on the head. We are not dealing with the old democrat party. That party went nuclear when Jimmy Carter left the presidential scene. This Demo. Party has been working behind the scenes on our children from K through 12 and once indoctrinated into the DEMO THOUGHT they then get radicalized in College or our Universities.

Two of mine went through K -12 and during that time they would come home with tidbits from their teachers--I mean very over the top environmental issues that kids their ages should never or would never think about. When confronted they would explain the philosophical direction they were being taught. They were being indoctrinated into a belief in rules and regulations of U.N. AGENDA 21. Signed into being by none other then weak minded George H. Bush in 1991 OR 1992! That fool has no idea how damaging that Doc. signing was to America. We now have a man in office who would shelve the Constitution by Martial Law and implement Agenda 21 in place of it, and be totally happy about it!

Don't be surprised if that [M. L.] comes about because its on Obamas agenda as a weapon to maintain power--IT COULD HAPPEN and many are watching for any crack in Obama's actions to head it off should he attempt to make that happen. Obama is weakening America militarily abroad and here at home, to allow ISIS an IN, to this country, so they might cause something monumental like 911, Obama would use it to declare Martial Law--Although Obama would be the root cause.

Every possible action should be thrown at Obama to keep him from attempting anything like this such as shutting down the EPA. De-fund the EPA and many of Obama's plans would die on the vine.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service