Could Obamacare Architect Be Prosecuted For His Deceit?

Deceit. Fraud. Premeditated felonious theft from millions of Americans.

Now that Jonathan Gruber, known as “The Architect” of Obamacare, has been publicly revealed as a joyful con artist in a YouTube video, are his actions prosecutable?

The victims are the millions of Americans who lost their major medical insurance policies due to Obamacare, lost their doctors, their children’s doctors, their family’s cancer specialists and coverage at children’s hospitals and cancer clinics because of a law that was sold to Americans as being just the opposite.

The victims are the millions of Americans whose premiums increased so dramatically that they are forced to drop their coverage.

A video recently posted of the MIT professor speaking in 2013 as an academic panelist is a criminal confession in which he gleefully bragged that the ironically-named “Affordable Care Act” was written in such a way as to obfuscate the true nature of the bill’s effects and hide from the American public and the Congressional Budget Office the fact that if they told the truth the bill would not pass.

In Gruber’s own words: “This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Okay, so it’s written to do that.  In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in – you made explicit healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed… Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass… Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not.”

Liberal elites nod their heads at this, agreeing that the American people are too stupid to know what’s good for them. The elites feel compelled to tell you and me how we should live. After all, it “was really, really critical for the thing to pass.”

I called constitutional attorney John Whitehead, the successful civil liberties lawyer who has avenged many poor citizens horribly abused by enforcers of rabidly aggressive laws.

My goal was to learn if Herr Gruber could be not only prosecuted but successfully prosecuted.

read more:

Views: 786

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Gruber, Pelosi, Obama and all the others who knew about this from the start, should be tried and put in prison, but with this totally corrupt administration and DOJ, it will never happen.

How about bait and switch tactics, theft by deception and Unconstitutional acts?


Then who does it? Can we the people file a mass lawsuit against the whole lot of them? Does anyone know?

I don't think we can sue the government unless they approve - sound familiar?

The Courts have this thing called standing and the rules are not very clear - so it is mostly a Judges choice if you can sue or not.

What about a citizen's grand jury in each state? They are one of the last lines of defense, other than county sheriffs.

Google Citizen Grand Jury - I think it is not of any real use.

Mangus -On the other hand, it could be of "real use", but only if the state's AG is a "rip-snortin' conservative", willing to pull out all the stops and fight for  Constitutional law!  Do we have any of those? Anywhere?  There must be a few, look at all the "Republicans" that have just been elected.

What about Common Law courts?

Gruber IS NOT gov't, he's a private citizen hired by the gov't as a consultant. He can be charged with criminal offenses. As for a case having standing; the rules are clear, all you have to do is show  personal harm either financially or physically.

Personally, I would have every state (7) that Gruber provided his consulting services file a lawsuit to charge him with fraud. and sue him for damages. Tie up his life so bad, he has to take a "Leave of Absence" from MIT to attend all the court appearances. And, then shame his elitist super-annuated ego and drag him down.

I like the way you think.  Do to one of them what the administration has been doing to the whole country which is to embroil so many people on so many different fronts with unconstitutional acts that the legal system is literally overwhelmed.

Redress of Grieviances?




Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson


Obama Lies Again: – Ignores That The Year After Signing The Stimulus More Than (4) Million Jobs Were Lost

Former President Obama, the only President in US history who had his FBI and other Intel agencies spy on the opposition party candidate, claims that he created the great economy that Americans are enjoying today. The only thing Obama created was debt and massive job losses with his horrible economic recovery.

Yesterday the former President tweeted an effort to take credit for President Trump’s successful economy:

Joe Hoft@joehoft

Of course another @BarackObama lie. He can’t open his mouth without lying. 11 years ago the US lost (4.3) million jobs over the next 12 months. Horrible liar. 

Barack Obama  @BarackObama

Eleven years ago today, near the bottom of the worst recession in generations, I signed the Recovery Act, paving the way for more than a decade of economic growth and the longest streak of job creation in American history.

President Obama’s policies were a disgrace and a failure. He doubled the national debt in spite of zero interest rates from the Fed. His recovery was the worst in US history.

Also, Obama’s assertion is just plain false. The ‘Stimulus’ was passed in February 2009 right after Obama took over the Presidency. He promised to not pass any bills for at least a week to allow for the bills to be read by the people but lied as soon as he was sworn in. The Stimulus was hundreds and hundreds of pages of government handouts to Democrat districts and it was close to $1 million. This was not what America needed and it led to the Tea Party.

Far-left Wikipedia has this to say about the Stimulus:

Note that in his infinite wisdom, NYT economist Paul Krugman is credited with arguing that “the stimulus was far smaller than the economic crisis warranted”. (He also said the markets would crash and burn if President Trump was elected President.)

The data shows that the 12 months after Obama’s stimulus, the US lost 4.3 million jobs:

In Obama’s first three years he netted a loss of 1.5 million jobs compared to President Trump who has added more than 6.7 million jobs.

When it comes to the economy, the billionaire schools the community organizer every time.

Tucker: Bloomberg is trying to buy the election

© 2020   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service