Your Hometown & the United Nations’ Agenda 21

In March 2010, Nor-Cal Produce, a family-owned produce business in West Sacramento, was fined $32,500 by the California Air Resources Board (ARB, or CARB). The company was not charged with, or even accused of, illegal emissions; like many other businesses, it had merely failed to notice a new regulation posted by CARB requiring all semi-trailers, shipping containers, vans, and rail cars with diesel-powered refrigerators to file a report with the agency.

“We had no knowledge of the law,” Nor-Cal’s Chief Financial Officer Todd Achando told CalWatchDog, a news blog that monitors California government. “My operations manager happened to see it mentioned in a trade magazine about a year and a half after the deadline passed.” Because Nor-Cal reported itself to CARB and “cooperated,” the agency reduced the $200/day fine from $86,600 to $32,500.

POLL: Do you believe the United States government is beginning to resemble a totalitarian regime?


Kit Enger and his fellow dune buggy manufacturers also cooperated with CARB, but found it was like dealing with a mob “protection racket.” Enger, president of the Compliant Car Builders Association in Oceanside, California, said association members attended the agency’s “implementation outreach workshop” for OHRV (off-highway recreational vehicles) and worked “diligently with CARB certification staff to devise a program whereby all industry members could efficiently and effectively certify their vehicles and engines.” Despite the increased costs and inconvenience of complying with CARB’s new regulations, association members thought things were going pretty well — until January 2008 when CARB hit them with $3.6 million in penalties for alleged violations. The association’s lawyers worked the fine down to $600,000, but Enger says even that penalty was unconstitutional, amounting to an ex post facto prosecution for engines modified and sold before the new CARB regulations went into effect.

“My lawyers said it would cost more than $600,000 to fight it, so we might as well pay it. It’s like a protection racket — government out of control,” said Enger. When he testified before CARB in November 2009, Enger told the board that one of their CARB enforcement officers had told him on two occasions, “If you guys don’t get on with this settlement, it doesn’t matter to us if you go out of business, change your name, move to another state, or die, we will find you and attach your assets.”

more:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/6911

Views: 730

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've often thought just why the gubment was so against organized crime.  The gubment hates competition...

Tell you what Obama, if you can kill me, you can "TRY" to take my land from my surviving Family Members.

No salt as a preservative, regulate refrigeration, don't allow cattle to graze or water? Does anyone else sense a plot to cripple our ability to eat?

CIGARETTES, ARE A SLOW DEATH, FOR MANY PEOPLE, GO GOVERNMENT INSTEAD, IT WILL BE MUCH FASTER.

It seems this government Federal, state and local are getting more corrupt by the minute

Take all the illegals from Texas, NM, and Arizona and place them in California and New York. Take out in exchange all the patriots who are trapped and bring them and their businesses to TX,etc. Then no vacationing to either state. 

I myself refuse to go skiing in Colorado because of Gov. Chickenpooper and all the idiotic communism. Besides, NM is much better than Communorado for skiing. Red River, Taos, Etc.

This also says a lot of the character of the people who would take these types of jobs to extort money from good people! What kind of person can look another in the face while enforcing these types of "laws"? Good people would refuse a job like this...if they couldn't hire people to do it then these BS "laws" would be unenforceable. For criminal acts to be done criminals must be hired!

The United States is in really bad shape when it comes to 'Knowing the Laws of the Land' 'cause the laws change from day to day - - is it any wonder why US & We the People are 'fed-up' with government intervention . . .

   CARB is a Calif. Exactly  what the Obaboonzo regime wants to impose on an unknowing NATION. It just so happens that Calif has a super majority of Socialist democrats who suck the hind tit of this Obummer Regimes' butt.

This is so unless one lives in Alabama ... Our state legislature passed a law in 2011 FORBIDDING any entity of government within our state borders from participating in any way in Agenda 21 -- and the Gulf Coast towns that were well down the road of full compliance WERE FORCED TO DROP OUT AND RETURN ANY UNUSED MONIES TO THE U-S STATE DEPARTMENT (the grantor of such funds) ...

And folks wonder why I live in Alabama ...

The government must shrunk down to about 20% of what it is now giving the employees pink slips. We the people must arrest most, convict them sending them south of the border permanently, explaining to them if we see them again they will be shot on site. Not done, then get the word out that those we sent south are parasites, con artists,thieves and criminals.

The agenda 21 simply proves the wrath of God will be poured out upon all nations.  This is a Gentle approach to assisting Satan in dogma and doctrine.  This is not in God's plan he has never informed any man on earth to do anything other than serve him.  This does not serve the Lord this serves man made doctrines that destroy God's plan.  Help your neighbors. Love your neighbors.  But, do not instruct them in ways that place you in charge of your neighbors.  You will become  a slave to your neighbors if you follow agenda 21.  They have 0 intentions of improving the plight of man.  This is worse than Ocare.  This is just another collective socialist agenda.  It rewards no-one yet prepares the way for total Global control of all land on earth.  Everytime there is an election anywhere there will be a coup and others will be given your land if you do not conform to Agenda 21.  Thailand is a perfect example they just had a coup because of agenda 21. This administration in this nation is bowing to agenda 21 doctrines and is letting the youth of Agenda 21 enforcers into this nation.  So they can aide in keeping all citizens inside the citizen zones.  You are not allowed outside the citizen zones. 

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service