Obama Wants to Pay 33% More to U.N. and Other Int’l Groups

When U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power testifies before a House Appropriations subcommittee on Wednesday, the panel will consider a budget request for international organizations that is 33 percent bigger than last year’s, including a 43 percent hike in U.S. contributions to peacekeeping missions.

The administration’s fiscal year 2015 budget request for the U.N. and other organizations is $4.036 billion, up from $3.031 billion in FY2014. For contributions to peacekeeping missions, it is asking for $2.518 billion, up from $1.765 last year.

POLL: If your state enacted gun confiscation laws:  Would You Comply?

The $2.518 billion for peacekeeping amounts to 28.36 percent of the U.N.’s total peacekeeping budget. The U.S. also provides 22 percent of the separate U.N. operating budget. The U.N. has 193 member states.

According to Heritage Foundation scholar Brett Schaefer, President Clinton in 1994 signed a law setting a 25 percent cap on U.S. contributions for U.N. peacekeeping, which at the time were running at around 30 percent.

- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/obama-wants-pay-...

Views: 555

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This SOB has to be STOPPED.

We are trying to get RID of the United Nations from America's shores, so WHY would we consider a budget request for international organizations that is 33 percent higher than last year, PLUS a 43 percent hike in U.S. contributions to peacekeeping missions.  Our current president is not out for peacekeeping missions in the U.S., so why would we offer $2.518 billion, up from $1.765 billion last year? Is Obama planning to take over the U.N. next? Probably....

Looks as though the communist, rotten pig, half-breed is trying to "BUY" importance and integrity for himself!  Forget it, let's just prevent him and congress from having to pay "ANY FURTHER FOREIGN AIDE" AT ALL!!!  The countries who receive the aide, still hate the USA 

What part of F the U.N. doesnt barry understand .

By the way nice photo of the punks that are coming for our guns (good luck with that ).

No FREAKING way dipwad!

For the communist to take over America it is required we have a debt we can not repay. I think we are there.

   The United States should Nuke the United Nations in repayment for all they have done to destroy us out of greed and envy alone , and Obam-ass should be tied to the bomb . 

NO WAY  Another reason to leave the UN  no more money to foreign agencies of any kind.  Perhaps the Tea Party can take on the task of ridding the US citizens of the UN and its communist agenda.

This action is tantamount to financing the NEW WORLD ORDER.  If Congress were to approve this, the slippery slide that I have been blogging about, will get even slippery.  WE, as a Country, DO NOT WANT TO SLIDE INTO THAT ABYSS.  Call your Senators/Representatives.... This is B*** S*** and needs to be stopped.  Almost 7 BILLION dollars for the UN...We have people out of work, a failed Health plan, in debt up to our friggin eye balls, our military being reduced, a failing infrastructure.  By GOD ALMIGHTY, what does it take to stop this tyrant?    

I don't see any minorities  (Whites) in this picture of the paper tiger UN peace keeping troops . Could some buddy please call the UN and Ask why they are be racist again. Who is Barry ? to want to give these paper tigers 33% more of America's hard earned  money. What Barry should be doing is signing them all up for Obamacare instead.    

Well of course he does. We need to get the U.N. out of this country and now. Pay them money , for what? HELL, WE ARE BROKE ! ! ! ! This guy is sooo not an American. Why is the G.O.P. letting him continue to break the law and the bank????? Some one please tell me why they are not even talking about impeaching this treason peace of communist crap ???????? I am so tired of this .

This two-faced, anti-American, lying, Muslim communist fuck has to be stopped, kicked out of the White House, and tried for treason.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service