United Nations Panel Demands ObamaCare Coverage for Illegal Aliens, Denounces ‘Racist’ Voter ID Laws

un

by Gina Cassini | Top Right News

Once again the United Nations is sticking its nose where it doesn’t belong — in the affairs of American citizens.

The UN Human Rights Committee at its March 2014 session in Geneva issued its fourth report on human rights in the United States, blasting the “denial of coverage” through the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, to illegal aliens as a” human rights concern”.

Under the heading “Immigrants,” in the “concluding observations” portion of the report, the committee questions the “mandatory nature of the deportation of foreigners” and then addresses health care for those in the United States illegally.

“Finally, the Committee expresses concerns about the exclusion of millions of undocumented immigrants and their children from coverage under the Affordable Care Act and the limited coverage of undocumented immigrants and immigrants residing lawfully in the U.S. for less than five years by Medicare and Children Health Insurance, all resulting in difficulties in access of immigrants to adequate health care,” the report states.

http://toprightnews.com/?p=2177

Views: 1091

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The hell with what the UN says it has out lived its usefulness now its time to move on get the U.S. out of the UN and they can take their building with them along with their "membership fees" which no one pays but us

Tell me if the United Nations is so concerned about rights of the millions of "illegal immigrants" how come they do not look at the shit hole country that they come from, with crime and a corrupt government that will not help it own citizens with basic needs to sustain life.

We have millions of people that are looking for a better way of life at the cost of our way of life , the left wing wackos want to give them everything Schooling medical help and welfare and help them with housing all at the tax payers ex penance.

I'm a combat wooded veteran living in California and I'm being taxed out of our home that has been in our family for over 50 years it represents about 1/6 of our total income we can not afford our family home much longer; but the Great State of California is willing to do anything to help the millions of Illegals with our taxes but cant and will not do anything to help the very men and women that fought and bled and died for this nation of ours!. Now tell me how can this happen in America ?                   

Oust these freaks from housing their organization in America and then resign from the UN. This organization is possibly the worst group of powerless elites who think they have some sort of mental gift to improve the world when, in fact, they are all power hungry insolent psychopaths with no other mission than to make their lives prosperous and financially rich.

UN STICK IT. If we had a real President, like Reagan, that is what he would say to them.

PS: being able to post things to Twitter as a way to get our info out would be nice. Most of my hits and retweets are from this site and too time consuming to try and shorten.

       SCREW THE UNITED NATIONS..........................................................PERIOD.                       Semper Fidelis

My thoughts exactly. Get us out of the UN and get the UN out of our country.
U.N. YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS HERE IN THE UNITED STATES !!! DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RULE OVER US ... WE HAVE OUR OWN GUIDELINES. THE CONSTITUTION SAYS NOTHING ABOUT YOU
GET THEE GONE FROM OUR SHORES

Doubt very much  if this true, regardless the un has no bearing on our laws. What makes they think they can tell us what to spend money on. If it is true it would be but one more reason why this communist organization needs expelled from our shores never to return again. The un is nothing more than immoral bunch of want to be dictators!

 

Steve.......True....UN has no bearing on our laws.......but with this current corrupt admin....they can make anything UN happen....in fact....that is bo's goal.

The UN can stick their opinion where the sun does not shine. Period.

Get the USA out of the UN, and Throw the UN out of the USA, PERIOD!

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service