Hiding Behind ‘Global Internet Community’ the ravening United Nations Wolf

Like the bully taking candy away from the proverbial baby, high-handed President Barack Hussein Obama is giving away the Internet that is in no way his to give.  His latest act of out-and-out thievery graduates him from the most unpopular American president of all time, to Enemy of the Free World Numero Uno.

The world has thrived on the Internet,  more valuable than any other asset of the average, making the world a Global Village since at least the late-1980s.Beggars ride with legions of politicians claiming king status along the Information Highway,  and in terms of communication, it is all that the beggars really have.

The Information Highway known as the Worldwide Web has been the main form of communication for everyday people,  and now Obama is taking it away from an America he loathes and just as been long feared, is handing it over to the United Nations.

Make no mistake, the falsely named “global internet Community” they’re trying to sell is the ravening wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Borrowing from their UN masters’ use of innocuous names, Obama and Company are calling their latest rape and pillage move the “multistakeholder model of Internet governance”, as announced by Lawrence E. Strickling, assistant secretary of commerce for communications and information.

read more:


Views: 453

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The evil empire has declared war on the world, we must not let them win.

I do not understand how he can do this, but like so many other things no one will stand up to him and stop him.

His muslim buddies will have it soon and extort from us what they please or we will not be able to use it.  The Un is nothing but a front, anymore, for global socialism and no civilian weapons.

I don't no if our leaders are scared, or they stand to make a lot of money, from another source

That makes more since. Since the evil empire doesn't exist except as something to be rebuilt by Putin. In Obama's warped and feverish mind he sees himself as a savior, still living his messiah name.

Try to get the word out to the people in their 20s,30s tell your kids - because even if many young people voted for Obozo, the internet is sacred to them. Maybe they will see the danger in this- back when Google went black, THAT got a strong reaction! I know Google is left leaning, but Mozilla Firefox has been a watchdog on this and they want internet freedom (support Mozilla!) Though this latest move- I am not sure even they know. Obama and the Commie/Muslim UN will spy on all of us and now they will tax us!

This is just a way for Obama to let his Muslim and Muslim Brotherhood buddies control the internet and impose Muslim beliefs and laws. No alcohol ads, nothing with women not covered up, no underwire bras, you know, basic Sharia Law. It has been referred to as Creeping Sharia here in the U.S. And now it seems to not be so creeping. Are we all so silly as to think that the Middle East would not jump at the chance to take control of the internet? Even Putin? Then what? We all pay ransom money just to check email. Remember those cafe's where someone would put a dime in, turn the dial, and get some time on a 56K modem?

Let your voice be heard. Write letters to every person in office expressing your dislike. Demanding the US hangs on to it. This is how I'll spend my week. I have also decided if America does this I will no longer be using the internet. We grew up on pencil, paper and land lines {phones}. They can work again.

The attack on and control of our means of sharing information was expected.

This is one of our most critical battles. We know who these people are; we know they will do anything the mind can conceive of to destroy freedom loving people.

if the president gets away with this, then we know every one in the white house, is an enemy of the constitution, I believe the presidents that have been assassinated or shot at. would not go against the constitution, the  

You haven't seen EVIL yet if this happens!

Everyone who uses the internet will be an open book to the UN laws and will have access to everyone's personal data. Think about it... What transactions are made without using the internet? Banking, bill payments, wholesale and retail transactions, driver license renewal, property taxes, Social Security payments, personal information with photos on Facebook etc., your medical information, insurance, stock trading, buying and selling from any vender... virtually everything! Our lives are open books with all this information! It will all be in the hands of the new taxes by the Evil United Nations! Too horrible to imagine!!

Obummer is just getting even with this country he hates.

The commies of the world will get what ever they want. We wont! 




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service