The Constitution can’t protect us if we don’t protect it

There may be something to the claim that all people want to be free. But it is a demonstrable fact that freedom has been under attack, usually successfully, for thousands of years.

The Federal Communications Commission’s recent plan to have a “study” of how editorial decisions are made in the media, placing FCC bureaucrats in editorial offices across the country, was one of the boldest assaults on freedom of the press. Fortunately, there was enough backlash to force the FCC to back off.

With all the sweeping powers available to government, displeasing FCC bureaucrats in editorial offices could have brought on armies of “safety” inspectors from OSHA, audits from the Internal Revenue Service, and many other harassments from many other government agencies.

Such tactics have become especially common in this administration, which has the morals of thugs and the agenda of totalitarians. They may not be consciously aiming at creating a totalitarian state, but shameless use of government power to crush those who get in their way can produce totalitarian end results.

The prosecution of Dinesh D’Souza for contributing $20,000 to a political candidate, supposedly in violation of the many campaign-finance laws, is a classic case of selective prosecution. Thugs who stationed themselves outside a polling place in Philadelphia to intimidate white voters were given a pass, and others accused of campaign-finance violations were charged with misdemeanors, but Dinesh D’Souza has been charged with felonies that carry penalties of years in federal prison. All of this is over a campaign contribution that is chicken feed compared with what can be raised inside of an hour at a political fundraising breakfast or lunch.

Could this singling out of D’Souza for prosecution have something to do with the fact that he made a documentary movie with devastating exposures of Barack Obama’s ideologies and policies? That movie, incidentally, is titled “2016: Obama’s America,” and every American should get a copy of it. It will be the best $10 investment you are ever likely to make.

Read more:National Review Online

Views: 427

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

We need to clean out Washington. Period.

Amen to that!    Begin by holding Holder accountable for treason (overthrowing & not upholding the law and Constitution)!   Look up the word "treason".    Hold judges, prosecutors, and grand juries  accountable to the "Webster definitions".   Force local & state courts to try civil and criminal Constitutional issues - take it out of federal preeminence!     Read Article 6 Clauses 2 & 3 - ALL are empowered and under oath/duty to defend & protect the Constitution against all enemies, foreign & domestic... without any mental reservation..."   There is no maybe about it!

So true. Holder's treasonous acts by only defending the laws he wants to defend and uphold is troubling enough. This whole administration has been the most unconstitutional in our countries history. All of them should be in prison.

Sounds good ! any suggestions ?

YES! ! ! ! !

We, the People, need to use the tools that we have in order to straighten out the mess.  The Supreme Court just acknowledged the fact that the Common Law Grand Jury belongs to the people. We do not need any government approval in order to call OUR Grand Jury into session.  Once in session it has the power to investigate corruption anywhere it finds it.  The Supreme Court specifically said the Common Law Grand Jury could even go after the Judges.

A Common Law Grand Jury has 25 members.  We need to organize the Grand Jury and present the facts concerning the Treason of not following the Oath of Office.  Then, when the Grand Jury hands down the indictment, the Superior Common Law Court takes that indictment and rules on it.  That ruling could be that the person is guilty of Treason and no longer authorized to hold their position.  THEY ARE FIRED IMMEDIATELY! ! ! ! !

Notice is sent to the person who writes the checks that this person no longer holds the position.  AND, tell the check writer that if any more checks are written to the Oath Breaker the check writer will be charged with Embezzlement.  After all, it's our money and our government, and we have the OBLIGATION and the DUTY to make sure it does what we - OUR FOUNDING FATHERS - set it up to accomplish.

These people all work for us and if they don't do what we want done, then we have the power, the authority, and the ability to fire them ONE THE SPOT! ! ! ! !

in order to protect our sacred constitution we MUST get rid of Obama he is the one destroying it.

Ya! And he's getting a lot of help! And what hurts my soul, is they call them selfs Americans.

Our constitution gives us, the people the authority to throw this government out and start a new one, read it and understand we have a lot of power other than the vote but we have to do it together and with proper leadership, not the spineless bunch that have been elected from our states as congressman and senators.

Steve.....with all  due respect.....I think you meant the Declaration of Independence....specifically makes a 'call to action' to us, We, the People....with details in middle of 2nd paragraph to 'abolish'.  I'm just some may not know the difference.

Constitution written to restrain the government.

Declaration written for the people to take action when government violates Constitution.  


There are two parts...

I didn't know about McCain background until now. A real eye opener!

Also check out H.H. Res 15 sitting in congress today...

Our Founders knew just how fragile it was to keep a Republic, with all of the Power seekers from past History. Why Benjamin Franklin stated, "What we have is a Republic,  IF you can keep it."

Thank God for the Tea Party Patriotic Americans.




Bill and Hillary Clinton Brutally
Mocked After Defending

View image on Twitter

Crooked Bill and Hillary Clinton were brutally mocked Monday after defending the Clinton Foundation on social media.

The Clinton Foundation’s official Twitter account tweeted Saturday, “ICYMI: President @BillClinton wrote on Facebook this week about our work improving lives in the United States and around the world, from fighting climate change to combating the opioid crisis.”

Former President Bill Clinton’s Facebook post served to correct the record about so called fake news smearing the Clinton Foundation. Naturally, he linked to far left sites such as Snopes and Politifact to debunk the smears.

After touting all the charity the Clinton Foundation brings to hurricane victims, farmers in East Africa and combating Climate Change, Bill Clinton unleashed on Breitbart News for spreading conspiracy theories and false information about the Foundation.

Nevertheless, spreading false information about the Foundation continues, apparently as part of an ongoing strategy to distract attention from real problems and, over the long run, to completely erase the line between fact and fiction.

For example, just a few weeks ago on MSNBC, during a discussion of the President’s disparaging remarks about Haiti, his designated defender repeated the ridiculous assertion that I had taken money raised for Haiti for personal use and was responsible for the apparent suicide of a Haitian who knew all about it. Thankfully, the host cut her off, refusing to provide a forum for known false conspiracy theories. I’m proud of the work the Foundation and I have done in Haiti and will give you a more detailed report on that soon.

These attacks on the Foundation began in earnest with the 2015 publication of the Breitbart-inspired book, Clinton Cash. I thought the Foundation staff did a good job debunking the book’s charges, but they were published as written even in “mainstream” outlets, and even now the charges continue to be repeated online and in forums favorable to those who make them.

I have never responded personally to these charges, but out of respect for our donors, partners, and those who work at the Foundation, I think I should—because as we see, attacks, no matter how outrageous, can have a long life.

Bill Clinton also argued Chelsea’s wedding wasn’t paid for by Clinton Foundation donations nor do any of them receive salaries.

No, Foundation funds were not used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc. It was a wonderful day that Hillary and I were grateful to be able to pay for.

Clinton also argued the foundation was given 4 out 4 stars from Charity Navigator, Platinum from GuideStar, A from Charity Watch, and a 20 out of 20 score for meeting all of the Better Business Bureau’s good practice standards.

Hillary Clinton tweeted: Want to hear the real story of the @ClintonFdn? Read this: 

 Trump supporters savaged the Clintons.

How about when Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Oman donated MILLIONS to your foundation when you were Secretary of State and then you conducted official US business with them? 

What about how Haitian villages that you raised money for are STILL without the homes, schools and infrastructure you promised for them? Where did it go Hillary? Where's that money? Why did you plunder the great people of Haiti? 


Unless it explains

Benghazi 33,000 missing emails  Haiti  Destroyed electronics  Missing money
Uranium One Etc

Then no. Nope.  
Not on Presidents day.  

Care to tell us how much the Foundation pays out in salaries each year? 


Slush fund? Pay-to-play? Salaries for Sid Blumenthal?
Fraud in Haiti?  The vast majority of funds don't reach people in need?
That's the real story, right?   



© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service