Dem Congresswoman: Obamacare Sign-ups Low Because Millions Think GOP Repealed the Law

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) joined MSNBC host Richard Lui on Monday to discuss the number of Affordable Care Act beneficiariesreleased by the Department of Health and Human Services over the we.... She offered a novel suggestion for why enrollment figures fell short of projections: the GOP successfully convinced the public that the law was repealed. 

While 1.1 million have enrolled, 3 million enrollees were expected at this point and 7 million are needed by March 31, 2014, in order to ensure the program is financially viable. Norton posited that the enrollment figure is lower than expected for a number of reasons, including the fact that millions believe the Republican Party succeeded in repealing the law.

“The goal as has been said, it’s seven million people signed up by the end of March,” Lui observed. “Can that happen?”

read more:

Views: 624

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Wonder how she figured that when all the Liberal Obama supporters listen to MSNBC & the Liberal media!??  They sure as hell were praising Obamacare and knew it wasn't repealed.   "WOW"!

Eleanor Holmes Norton - what a total dips**. Where did she pull that new lie from....

Delusional does not go far enough for the democrats apparently.  After making so much over those nasty republicans causing the government shut down because they could not appeal obamacare, she really came up with that one?

Actually the Obamacare project is low for most American know how bloody bad it is;... even the very own designers do not want it for themselves , do they?

So, as result, the administration people are making up numbers, , fictional tallies of enrollees , that in reality is another deception....better said.... more lies...are they not?

Here is a vivid example;...

Oh!, your can bet your shoes and you will not loose them, that Team-Obama is signing up dead people...perhaps vampires,... zombies,... even aliens from outer-space,...who knows?
Just remember that democrats did manage to register even a cat for the 2008 fraudulent elections,. anything can happen from that day
Everyone out there,...just remember the moment;
« Who is the real Barack Obama? | Main | "Sissy, that should be in Bartlett's" »
October 09, 2008
"I found a cat that was registered to vote"
When a cat registered [presumably as a Democrat] to vote was discovered in Cleveland's Cayahoga County a few years back, any sensible person would have realized at once it was fraud. Just ask Tiny, above in a post-catnip stupor (note flakes on fur). Cats are neither Republican nor Democrat but Independent.
"I found a cat that was registered to vote," Bill Sammon is telling Megyn Kelly on Fox News re Acorn (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) voter-registration fraud in Ohio back when Bill was an investigative reporter covering the Cayahoga County Board of Elections for the Cleveland Plain Dealer during a previous election:
They weren't sure whether it was a DemoCAT, fat-CAT Republican or working for Ross PURR-ot. Acorn isn't just some left-wing group. Its a group that Barack Obama used to work for and served as an attorney for suing the state of Illinois to implement the motor-voter law.
Input anyone? Opinions welcome.

I live in Cuyahoga County.

Like Detroit, D's are messing everything up. Period.

Yet another bit of proof that those folks that believe in Obummercare are just so frigging stupid and looking for a free ride on the USA wagon...

They sure do think people are stupid.

I swear their mantra never ends. All their shortcomings are the fault of Bush or the Republicans. The American people aren't stupid, their finally seeing what a tax riddled over grab this monstrosity is.

Imagine that, the majority of this sick nation is listening to the GOP...but they put the master criminal of all times in office @ the polls.

Another product of gerrymandering to make sure that blacks are represented by black persons in Congress. She, Maxine Waters, Shelia Jackson Lee, Conyers, and others are an embarrassment to their people.

Wrong!   It's because we can't afford it especially since it is 3 to 4 times higher now and we don't need the government jacking it all up and making us believe they are helping us if they subsidize us to get us on.  Just another way to force welfare on people and make them their bitch.




Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Goodbye 2020: Clinton Ordered By Federal Judge To Submit To Questioning

( – Just when Hillary Clinton began hinting that she’s ready to run again in 2020, she has been ordered by a federal judge to submit to questioning about the use of her private email server to convey classified documents during her time as Secretary of State.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan made the order as part of a lawsuit from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch.

“Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions — including key q’s about the setting up of her email system,” wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a tweet following the ruling.

Judicial Watch 🔎 @JudicialWatch

BREAKING: Judicial Watch announced today that, following JW's court battle, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that Hillary Clinton must answer – under oath – two additional questions on her controversial email system within 30 days.

Judicial Watch: Federal Court Ordered Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under...

 (Washington, DC) –Judicial Watch announced today that U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that within 30 days Hillary Clinton must answer under oath two additional questions about her...
Tom Fitton  @TomFitton

Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions -- including key q's about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!

As a statement from Judicial Watch explains, the ruling is the latest development in the group’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which they began to discover why former deputy chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton, Huma Abedin, was allowed to work at the State Department while also engaged in “outside employment.”

Clinton now has 30 days to answer two key questions from a list of 25 questions composed by Judicial Watch.

The questions the judge selected are:

1) “Describe the creation of the system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.”

During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

This new development is huge because it means that the two critical scandals from Clinton’s time in the State Department, her private email server and the Benghazi attacks, are facing fresh scrutiny in both the legal system and the court of public opinion.

And while Clinton likely had little chance of any run in 2020, this makes it even less likely she will stand even a shred of a chance.

We’ve have got to hope and pray that at long last, this leads to the long overdue criminal charges we’ve all been waiting to see.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service