What Isn't Racist? According to the Media, Nothing

President Obama's election was supposed to usher in an era of racial unity greater than any Americans had previously experienced. By making the historic move to place the first black president in the White House, Americans signified that they were ready to move beyond the racial conflicts of the past and move forward, arm-in-arm.

At least that's what we were told. So much for that.

In the last two weeks, MSNBC's Chris Matthews, official hot-air-trial balloon for the Obama administration's public relations strategy, has played the race card incessantly. First, he proclaimed that Republican New Jersey senatorial candidate Steve Lonegan was using a racist "dog whistle" when he stated that Cory Booker's Newark was a "black hole" for state tax funds. Then, Matthews said that tea partiers using the word "we the people" to describe the country signified racism, since not everyone agrees with the tea party program.

- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/commentary/ben-shapiro/what-isnt-racist-accordin...

Views: 640

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

GREAT!  That simply means that every single word that comes out of the mouth of liberal lamestream MSNBC's Chris Matthews is completely 100% racist and racial.  What a nit-wit strategist he is.

It is really scary that someone as psychotic as Chris Matthews is given a platform to spew his vitriol and hatred on a nightly basis to the American people.  Matthews is not only an embarrassment to America, but more importantly he is an embarrassment to the human race (oops - I used the word race - guess that makes me a racist).

Its simply not true!  There is lots that's not racist - every lie about Obama's "goodness" is not racist.  Every media softball thrown at Obama and his flunky, Carney - that's not racist.  Its only racist if its the truth that, in any way, reflects poorly on Obama!

 

The Koolaid is flowing as fast as it can be swallowed by the left wingnuts.

When Magnus Hirschfield invented the word Racism in the 1930s it was designed as both a psychological tool of manipulation, and a propaganda tool.  Usually words with ( ism) attached to the end denote a belief system. Take for instance Buddhism, Taoism, capitalism etc.  Yet the exception is Racism. Belief in Race ?  No it has morphed into anything that the left wants it to be in order to have a bludgeon to beat anyone that opposes them.  It is an indisputable fact that in the taboos and goals of politically correct society that all races are encouraged to take great pride in their heritage, their history, and their race.  Is this true ?  Come on are we really so much in la la land that we cannot see that one race is excluded.  What race could that be ?  Well, let me give you a hint.  Western civilization is the single greatest enemy of cultural Marxism. Who founded and perpetuated Western Civilization ?  Oh my gosh, it was those nasty Europeans.  Oh, by the way, the Europeans are Caucasians. Well, since Europeans founded America,  should not the enlightened leftist seek to fundamentally change America ?

Wow. Noel Ignatiev has the answer. It is called the "New Abolition."  Rejoice oh ye Bolsheviks. The West has fallen: (well not yet). The poison has been given, but it has not poisoned everyone.  Bolsheviks still have to worry about what nature might do.  After all, ethno-nationalism is as old as the tribes of mankind, and the highest law of biology is the survival and perpetuation of the species (or in some cases the ethnic survival).    

But that is racism?  Your leftist would say that some ethnicities created or endorsed capitalism, Christianity, Western Civilization, and free thinking.  Those ethnicites  need to be eliminated or subjugated. Isn't that correct Mister neo Marxist ?

IGNORE THE IDIOT LIBS AND THEIR NAME CALLING . THERES WAY TOO MUCH THATS WRONG WITH AMERICA NOW THAT NEEDS FIXING . BULLIES NEVER SOLVE ANYTHING THEY ARE JUST REDUCED TO USING INSULTS .

So, does this mean if a person of another race and I disagree about politics or any other topic, we are both racists?

Of course, Anyone who has the ability to think for him/herself, and expresses an opinion not agreeable to the other is considered a racist by white house standards.  

Obama spin = PROPAGANDA; so they are constantly lying to us and the world..  There is seldom a bit of truth coming from this WH regime....!  Ask yourself why it is necessary for them to lie about every damn thing...!

Do you suppose it's because they think/know we would be enraged if we knew what they were REALLY doing in DC....?  Obama is NOT one of us and NEVER has been.......!

Pretty extreme when Obama promised to be the great unifier is actually the greatiest divider! That Democrats, the left, and media loud mouths have nothing but labels likes calling those opposed to Obama's take-over of the country- racists! You, we, I do not have to be racist to oppose this mans (or those he listens to, or who pulls his strings) failed utopia ideas. Obama promised the MOST TRANSPARENT ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY! What we have found to be true is black cloaks, executive privledge hiding documents for years into the future, and pledges of loyalty to Obama, Dictator n Chief before anyone gets close to this thin skinned, cannot take people talking badly or questioning his will, or worse yet, telling him NO! Damn would I love to tell him NO to his face! Obama and his media, have to pound out the word that those that oppose him are racist. That they oppose him because he is a black man. That is simply not the case. Poeple can disagree and... oppose each other if they were green and purple. Obama needs it to be about race, because that is all he has left! What a petty child Obama is! What a shame it is that this man is not a man, let alone, not even American born. This Kenyan born man, thinks that his executive orders supercedes existing law past by both houses and signed by a sitting president. Another sitting president cannot just come along and undo or modify a law with a stoke of his pen. If that where the case, think of the great many laws that would have been modified or changed all along the years! Obama thinks his executive orders are like Queen Elizabeth's Royal Decree's. THEY ARE NOT!

JUST ANOTHER IN THE PARADE OF CONTINUING LIES, THAT HAVE BEEN PUT FORWARD, SINCE THE FATHER OF LIES CAME TO RULE IN THE MINDS OF MEN.  IF BEN CARSON WERE IN AN ELECTION, BETWEEN HIM, AND CHRIS MATHEWS, I WOULD VOTE FOR BEN CARSON, AND I JUST HAPPEN TO BE A SOUTHERN 73 YEAR OLD VETERAN, TEA PARTY, WHITE MAN.  IF HOWEVER CHRIS MATHEWS WERE RUNNING AGAINST OBAMA, OR HILLERY, I WOULD HAVE NO INCENTIVE TO VOTE AT ALL, BECAUSE ALL OF THEM ARE AVOWED ENEMIES, OF NATURAL LAW, AND LOVE OF GOD, AND CHRISTIAN HATERS.

Anything that our great and glorious left wing "Progressive Socialist" ( COMMUNIST ) considers offensive suddenly becomes "racist." Yet the greatest "racist" in history illegally lives in the White House.

Well, some people never grow up. Seems like we have many in the MSM. When you have no other argument, use the slur of racism. The stupid part is that many in the party wouldn't mind seeing Carson and/or West in office. I suppose we're being racist somehow with that according to the MSM....or do they just ignore that fact. We want adults in office, not tantrum throwing 2 year olds.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

ALERT ALERT

Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.

SLAVEHOLDER??

Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service