by: Mychal Massie

There is an absolute that can be denied but cannot be refuted, and that is the only reason a person tries to hide something is because they have something to hide. They may be able to convince themselves to the contrary but that is simply emblematic of their attempt to deceive.

Pursuant to that fact, my friend made an astute observation recently as we discussed the dynamics of a particular person who epitomizes same. My friend said, “If you couldn’t trust them before, why would you ever trust them now?” My response was that I didn’t trust them, but I was fascinated by their varied attempts (read lies) to persuade me that my initial observations were wrong. Which brings me to my point.

I’ve written extensively over the past several weeks that we, the voters, need to be vigilant and suspicious of the current political atmosphere. I’m laboring on this point because I’m afraid that just as a dog returns to its vomit, and just as people reinvolve themselves in situations/relationships they know beyond any shadow of doubt to be destructive, such is the great danger in upcoming months.

What am I talking about? I’m talking about a demagogic, political zeitgeist entrenching itself around the central nervous system of the Republican Party in such a way that any pretense of there being a difference between it and the Democrat Party is merely coincidental.

Read more:

Views: 633

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The dumbing down of the American Educational system is finally paying dividends to the leftists!  We are seeing the results in our "leaders", our government in general, and definitely in our voters.  Buying folks off and intimidation has combined to suddenly make America a third rate toilet hole for the liberals and free loaders of the world to commune!  Good luck decent young folks, may God have mercy on your souls!

The evidence is clear: doesn't matter what combination of red and blue... the Fed Fiat Debt just grows bigger and bigger...


I do believe they both answer to George Sorass and his buddies.

It is this context that we should consider the question that understandably has been raised with increasing frequency lately:   whether a 3rd party should be formed.   It is easy to understand why many people, many of whom I respect and admire, are talking about this question seriously.   But here is the other side.    Discussion about whether to start a 3rd party implicitly assumes that we already have TWO parties.    That is to say, the premises of the proposal are off-base, for the simple reason that we don't have a true 2nd party in the United States today.   The Republican party, at least those who control it,  when push turns to shove, are basically part of the same liberal leftist plutocracy which the Democrat party serves.   The difference is one of degree only, and not a large one at that.   Sure, there are many Republicans who are true patriots, like Cruz, Rubio, Paul, and Lee, and many more.   But they are essentially, within the overall system at least, anomalies and idiosyncrasies, exceptions that prove the rule.   We would not therefore we forming a THIRD party;  we would be forming a SECOND party.   That puts a different light on things.   Would our party have enough strength, resources, and votes to overcome the combined strength of the "Democratic-Republican Alliance"?   That is the question that must be asked.   It would a different matter if this country were a multi-party system, as in many European democracies.   Then it would be easy to say, yes, we are going to form a new party.   Forming a so-called THIRD party in the US would only work to the eternal benefit of the leftist liberal Democratic-Republican Alliance, which we have already brought to its knees, amazingly, just with the present strategy.    I would advise to keep doing as we have been doing, not to be beguiled into the dead end street of a so-called THIRD (but in actuality SECOND) party.   Our continued strategy should be to remove RINOS from Congress in 2014.   The time will come for the Tea Party to politicize itself into an "party,"  but the time is not now and is in fact a long way off.  There will be, to a certainty,  many more shut-down and default crises to come in the future, each of which we can take full advantage of to advance our goals.   In the meantime the membership and influence of the Tea Party increases every day.

Until we can have a legal election, voting is a waste of time.

Although the actions of some Republicans in Congress are aiding and abetting the opposition, the Republican party as a whole is very much different from the Democrats.  During the Kennedy presidency, the Democrat party was different from the Republican party but they were patriots wanting the to keep America a free and strong nation.  In the years afterwards the Democrats kept the name but the leaders changed to focus to change America into a socialist nation subservient to a globalized government run by old world thinking of top down rule by self proclaimed emperors.  Most who call themselves Democrats have not noticed that their "leaders" have changed the direction and focus of their party.  We must not lose sight of who America's enemies are and not turn on our own.  We must not be ashamed of our passion for a free and just America. 

I knew this for along time. Time for Republicans to dismantle or else die slowly while our New Party will take power over those Demorats.

this is a takeover of our government(democrats),,,,we started ruling the people from crisis to crisis and NOW we have a new tool at our disposal,,,,Do what we tell you or we will shut the government down and default on our debt if you don't give us what we want,,,and it will be your fault( republicans),,,,and we will pick and choose who gets laid off and that will be your fault also(republicans),,,even though we are the ones who shut it down(democrats)And Now that that has worked to our advantage you can look forward to More Shutdowns,,,,More Painfull shutdowns ,,,,and even default if we do not get our way,,,,So Now we have King Obama who will punish all who get in his way(even the Military)and he wants to Take We The People Out of the Equasion by saying people shouldn't Pay Attention to the Public Media,,,The Internet Or The Talking Heads On The Radio,,,,so in essence don't listen to the truth ,,,Don't listen to the people,,,the people are now here to serve us,,,and we are above the people,,,and what we do is none of their business,,,,and now that you see how we are to be ruled then you can either get out and vote these people out or you can just accept it,,,and become the slave of the new world order,,,that Obama has worked so hard Bankrupting this country FOR,,,,HIS ULTIMATE GOAL,,,A One World Government Under The U N .....Under NATO,,,,and sharia law is already the religion that has been decided for you,,,,PROVE ME WRONG !!!!!

What if I told you  dem's and repub's were essentially the same party,   I would answer no shit sam spade




Clinton Donor And Tax Cheat Tied To Russia

“Do as we say, not as we do.”

That seems to be the slogan for Hillary Clinton and her political allies, and it’s especially apt in light of new information about one of Clinton’s largest campaign donors.

While the left is still trying to attack President Trump and his family over unproven business dealings and largely debunked connections to Russia, a new report indicates that it was Hillary Clinton’s team who were doing those exact things.

“Fox News has learned that one of the top donors to the ‘Hillary Victory Fund’ (HVF) in 2016 was a Los Angeles-based attorney who is alleged to have misused company funds to create his own $22 million real estate portfolio,” that outlet reported on Thursday.

“He has also been considered by California to be one of the state’s biggest tax cheats, and allegedly has ties to the (Russian) Kremlin,” Fox continued.

The man’s name is Edgar Sargsyan. His deep pockets greatly benefited Clinton’s campaign, with contributions of at least $250,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund in 2016.

He was also in charge of an elite fundraising dinner to benefit Clinton, where donors paid $100,000 per couple just to attend the ritzy event. But in true Clinton fashion, the money apparently went missing.

Sargsyan is now “being sued by his former company for allegedly diverting those funds to start his own real estate company,” according to Fox.

Now, people are asking hard questions about Clinton’s buddy Sargsyan, including whether his contributions were part of a pay-to-play scheme and if he had shady connections to foreign governments.

“Nobody gave to the Hillary Victory Fund out of the goodness of their heart or some generalized desire to help 33 random state parties,” pointed out attorney Dan Backer from the Committee to Defend the President.

“They did so to buy access and curry influence — something the Clintons have been selling for nearly three decades in and out of government,” he continued.

Trying to buy political influence is sadly common, especially when it comes to the Clintons. What is raising more red flags than normal, however, is the evidence that Sargsyan is no run-of-the-mill campaign donor.

“The really scary question is, what did this particular donor with this strange web of connections hope to buy for his quarter-million dollars?” Backer asked Fox News.

That web of connections is strange indeed.

The Committee to Defend the President is now alleging that SBK, a major Sargsyan-linked company “is an investment firm that is affiliated with United Arab Emirates president, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and its international affiliate has business interests in Russia,” according to Fox.

“Among its dealings was a bid to finance $850 million for a major bridge project to connect Crimea with Russia,” the group claims.

“He worked for SBK, and SBK appears to have bid on some Crimean/Russian bridge project,” Backer said. “That’s usually an indicator of political favor and connections.”

It raises several chilling questions: Was Sargsyan paying a quarter million dollars to Clinton for political favors, and — more disturbingly — was that money actually from sources in Russia in order to smooth the way for its construction plans?

Nobody knows for sure. What is clear, however, is that there is a pattern of dirty money surrounding the Clintons, with the “Uranium One” and “Clinton Foundation” scandals just two of the most well-known examples.

“It reinforces how fast and loose the Clinton machine was when it came to ‘Hoovering up’ these megadonor checks, not just from questionable Hollywood and Wall Street elites but potentially from foreign influence peddlers using who knows what money,” Backer told Fox News.

“It reinforces the need to take a long hard look at not just the unlawful money laundering process, but the way in which they were solicited as well,” he continued. “The Clintons have never shown a great deal of concern for whomever it was cutting the checks — whether it’s foreign influence peddlers or Hollywood smut peddlers like Harvey Weinstein.”

If those claims are even partially true, then America dodged a bullet in November of 2016 — and it’s worth keeping the pile of foreign-connected Clinton scandals in mind the next time the left tries desperately to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Perhaps they should look in the mirror.


Washington Post Compares
Jeff Sessions To Slaveholder’

The Washington Post compared Attorney General Jeff Sessions to “slaveholders” after he quoted the Bible on Thursday while discussing his department’s policy of prosecuting all illegal immigrants who cross the border.

Sessions made the statement during a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana.

WaPo ran a story entitled “Sessions cites Bible passage used to defend slavery in defense of separating immigrant families” by general assignment editor Keith McMillan and religion reporter Julie Zauzmer on Friday.

Rather than detailing the statistics Sessions cited in the speech that explain the immigration policy, the story quoted John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania.

“This is the same argument that Southern slaveholders and the advocates of a Southern way of life made,” Fea said.

Sessions spent much of the speech discussing the numbers behind current immigration policy, including separating families at the Southwest border.

“I would cite you to the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13, to obey the laws of the government because God has ordained the government for his purposes,” Sessions said.

“Orderly and lawful processes are good in themselves. Consistent and fair application of the law is in itself a good and moral thing, and that protects the weak and protects the lawful.”

“The previous administration wouldn’t prosecute aliens if they came with children,” Sessions said.

“It was de-facto open borders if you came with children. The results were unsurprising. More and more illegal aliens started showing up at the border with children.”

Sessions laid out the numbers in the speech.

“In 2013, fewer than 15,000 family units were apprehended crossing our border illegally between ports of entry in dangerous areas of the country,” he said.

“Five years later, it was more than 75,000, a five-fold increase in five years. It didn’t even have to be their child that was brought, it could be anyone. You can imagine that this created a lot of danger.”

The U.S. has the “opportunity” to fix its broken immigration system now, Sessions said.

“I believe that’s it’s moral, right, just and decent that we have a lawful system of immigration,” he said. “The American people have been asking for it.”

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service