Global gun grab: Kerry to sign landmark U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

Secretary of State John Kerry is expected to sign the landmark Arms Trade Treaty during the annual United Nations General Assembly meeting on Wednesday, American officials said.

The U.S. is the largest arms dealer in the world and its accession is seen as critical to the treaty’s success, although many other top arms dealers have not signed the document, the Associated Press reported. More than 85 countries have signed the treaty so far, but it will not take effect until 50 nations have ratified it, the report said.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/24/john-kerry-sign-lan... 

Views: 1288

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sounds like the begining of another push for gun control. I wouldn't trust anyone in this regime to do anything without an ulterior motive.

This is something that could be dangerous. If I am correct when Kerry signs this and Harry Reis does not vote on it immediately it is enforceable law until it is rejected. with 386,000 forgien troops on American soil the un could take our gun by Oct. 1. I need more information from someone in the know needs to be serious discussion. NOW.

I believe you are thinking of an executive order. 

John Kerry, traitor to the U.S. I can still see him standing with Hanoi Jane I am an AMERICAN, and I never signed up for this U.N. stuff. My sovereignty never included the U.N.

My understanding is a treaty does not take effect until it is approved by the Senate.  I did a little research some time back and the Supreme court declared that a treaty cannot change the Constitution.  The only thing that can change the Constitution is an Amendment. 

So even if dip-sh-- Kerry signs it, it can't change the Constitution. 

frjm

 Treason is in Order, if this paper is signed by Kerry.  In violation of His Oath to uphold the Constitution.  That Oath did NOT have any "Ifs, or Buts" to the 2nd Amendment.  His name to represent the American People is NOT worth the paper it's signed on, since ratification to ANY change to the Constitution has to go before the Congress and 38 states approval.   When are the Peoples Represenatives (Congress) going to take back Our Nation ?   What kind of Government this Nation has, will be decided in the next 3 yrs....!                        Semper Fidelis

KERRY IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE A. TRAITOR .

When The United States signs on to that treaty it guarantees that (GUN CONFISCATION) will become a normal part of our lives.

((((((((((((...............1776.............))))))))))))))

Kerry is just another lying, self-serving minion of the Regime....John Kerry is a FUCKING TRAITOR!!!!!

You got that right, and who ever sent that asswipe there is one also!

Article VI.  "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;....."  This section refers to prior peace treaties, such as Treaty of Paris in 1783 when the King of England regonized each and every STATE as Independent and soveriegn. Our Founding Fathers and Ratifiers did not grant Congress to give our rights and freedoms away in Foreign Treaties after a hard fought war of independance. Kerry can sign all the treaties he wants and it will have no effect on our 2nd amendment rights. Same goes for the President or even if the Senate passes the treaty it does not take presidence over our Constitutional Rights..:unalienable means non-transferable or can not be taken aways..semper fi

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by Al Goodwyn

ALERT ALERT

Gohmert: Dems Will Drag Out Impeachment — Try To Get ‘Best Socialist’ Nominated For President

During an appearance on Huntsville, AL radio’s WVNN on Thursday, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) offered his best assessment of what House Democrats were trying to accomplish with their impeachment efforts.

Gohmert told WVNN’s “The Jeff Poor Show” impeachment could tie up the Democratic Party’s presidential campaign efforts but predicted Democrats would use the occasion to nominate “the best socialist” they can.

“They would lose in the Senate,” Gohmert said on impeachment. “And besides that, the entire time it was on trial in the Senate, the Democrats who are running for president wouldn’t be allowed to campaign. That’s in the Constitution. They wouldn’t be able to campaign. I just can’t imagine them wanting to do that because if they send it to the Senate, they have now perfectly set up the scenario of 1996, where they will reassure Donald Trump is reelected as president. They don’t want to do that. They’re probably going to drag this thing out as long as they possibly can … through Iowa, through primaries — try to get the best socialist they can to be nominated.”

“Then just end up and say, ‘Now we’re close enough to the general election. We’ve thrown mud at the president through the House,’” he continued. “What they’re really doing — they’re using taxpayer funds to campaign against Trump. That’s all this is — a campaign fund that taxpayers are paying for in order to try to throw mud at the president. I’ll be surprised if they have that vote, but I can’t imagine they want to set up this president for reelection by having a trial in the Senate where they lose.”

Veteran's Day Tribute

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service