All Discussions Tagged 'Vote' (21)

Discussions Replies Latest Activity

Reclaim American Sovereignty Congress Vote To Leave The UN British Empire

Days after Trump’s inauguration, members of Congress are seizing the moment and pushing for America to exit the United Nations, introducing…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

17 Jan 23, 2017
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

More Than 800,000 Noncitizens May Have Voted in 2016 Election, Expert Says

An election expert projects more than 800,000 noncitizens voted in the 2016 election and overwhelmingly for Democrat Hillary Clinton. While…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

1 Nov 29, 2016
Reply by Hank Jordan

6.9 million multiple voters in 28 states, report finds

          . ‘IT’S A MESS’: True The Vote executive director Catherine Engelbrecht says “radical special interests” can game the electoral…

Started by Ralph E WallSr

62 Feb 18, 2016
Reply by martin smith lll

EXCLUSIVE: True The Vote Appeals Dismissal of Lawsuit Against IRS

AUSTIN, Texas — True the Vote, a Houston, Texas-based non-profit organization focused on “voters’ rights and election integrity,” has appe…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

22 Dec 20, 2014
Reply by Rede Batcheller

Senate averts shutdown, again

As it became clear the Senate would have to spend days debating a long-term government funding bill, the upper chamber passed another shor…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

21 Dec 15, 2014
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

La Raza Circulates State-By-State Guide On Where To Vote Without ID

(Daily Caller) - The pro-amnesty Hispanic activist organization the National Council of La Raza helpfully promoted a Washington Post artic…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

28 Nov 16, 2014
Reply by robert cosenza

1st Voter Fraud In NM; WI Mailman Dumped GOP Mailers

From the NBC Albuquerque, NM affiliate, KOB: First case of voter fraud confirmed in Rio Arriba Co. By: Kristen Garcia | November 1, 2014 T…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

24 Nov 4, 2014
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

Ebola Czar’s Daughter Heads GOTV For Pro-Obama PR Firm

. — Hannah Klain (@hklain) October 7, 2014 Hannah Klain, the daughter of Obama ebola czar Ron Klain, works for the PR left-wing firm tas…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

0 Nov 3, 2014

Voter fraud already surfacing: Can we beat the cheat?

By this time next week, we’ll know for certain the outcome of the 2014 midterm elections — however, will there be a side story? I have fir…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

36 Nov 3, 2014
Reply by Nick Leech

Group sues Maryland over ‘illegal’ voters

An election-watch group is suing Maryland over the alleged presence of noncitizens on the state’s voting rolls. The lawsuit, filed Friday…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

39 Oct 29, 2014
Reply by DeniseInAZ




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service