All Discussions Tagged 'United' (372)

Discussions Replies Latest Activity

NRA News Commentators | Ep. 96: Dom Raso “Pride and Ownership in the USA”

Dom Raso encourages Americans to hold themselves to the highest possible standard and to take pride and ownership in the land on which th…

Started by Kristi Ann Mod

116 Nov 23
Reply by Kristi Ann Mod

Using their own words and rulles

rcrs-one.5.2.2019%20Judicial%20and%20Other%20Notice.docx Could this deliver your freedom from the government's NGOs?

Started by Richard Schaum

3 May 5
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

Dividing Israel Could Be Very Bad For America

In the Bible we are instructed to be a blessing to the Jewish people.  In fact, God states “If you bless Israel, I will bless you.”  “But…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

3 Oct 9, 2017
Reply by Jea9

Sessions Makes Bombshell Announcement, Dems Are Furious

Americans who value religious liberty have won a major victory. According to Politico, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recently issued legal…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

2 Oct 8, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

Church Makes Lesbian a Bishop… Then She Makes Sick Jesus Statement

United Methodist Church bishop Dr. Karen Oliveto is not only an ordained member of the Methodist Church, but is also an open lesbian — th…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

2 Oct 6, 2017
Reply by Jea9

“This Is Just Plain Disrespectful”: Principal Under Fire As Teachers Learn Of Flag Lesson

Parents in Chicago were outraged when the principal of York Community High School put the American Flag on the floor as a way to introduce…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

1 Sep 29, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

Venezuelan President Preps For War With US As Latest Travel Ban Released

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. How did Venezuela President Nicolas Maduro respond to being added to Trump’s travel ban? He told his…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

0 Sep 28, 2017

Lebanon’s Christian President: Estimated 1.5 Million Syrian Refugees Must Go Home

The estimated 1.5 million Syrian refugees in Lebanon, a quarter of the population that has allegedly been used to fuel the Muslim-majority…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

0 Sep 27, 2017

Court Upholds Constitution, Judge’s Signature REQUIRED As “Landmark” Case Reaches Epic Finale

Thursday’s decision will have far-reaching significance impacting agencies up and down the scale. The District of Columbia Court of Appeal…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

0 Sep 22, 2017

Former Navy SEAL Shares Brilliant Plan to Stop North Korea… No Bombs Necessary

With tensions still incredibly thick on the Korean peninsula, the United Nations just approved more economic sanctions on the communist reg…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

0 Sep 14, 2017

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service