All Discussions Tagged 'Judicial' (76)

Discussions Replies Latest Activity

Bad News About Mueller’s Investigation

Former FBI director and current Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been unrelenting in his investigation into alleged collusion between Rus…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

10 Oct 10, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

Major Mueller Lawsuit Filed, Conservatives Love It

The DOJ is hiding Mueller’s budget from the American people. The Special Counsel has SEVENTEEN left-wing hack lawyers digging into Trump an…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

2 Oct 10, 2017
Reply by Dale Heathman

FBI Investigation Uncovers SICK Huma Abedin Crime – LOCK HER UP.

This is worse than the Clintons selling secrets to China. Two of Hillary Clinton’s top aides have been caught sending American secrets to a…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

7 Jul 16, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

Obama Nailed With Huge Corruption Lawsuit – $17 Billion Of Taxpayer Money Is Gone

Former President Obama disposed of the American people as he frequently ignored the wishes of our representatives in Congress. Governme…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

2 Jun 29, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

Judicial Watch Sues ICE After 1 Sanctuary City Metric Never Shows Up

ICE Is Being Sued For Information Regarding A Suspended Program. Judicial Watch has made quite a name for themselves. The conservative wa…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

4 Jun 23, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

CONFIRMED: Comey Planted Inside FBI as Clinton Fixer

Former FBI Director made sure Clintons were never prosecuted. FBI Director James Comey is a Clinton-fixer with a long history of running i…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

351 Jun 19, 2017

Watchdog Group SUES Obama, 1 Piece of Evidence Will Take Him Down

A non-profit group is leading the investigation into the illegal spying by former President Obama as Congress continues to ignore his crim…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

0 Jun 13, 2017

The Comey-Clinton Crime Syndicate Exposed

There is enough evidence here to convict them all. The name of the author has been removed to keep them from becoming the next victim of t…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

4 May 27, 2017
Reply by Dale Heathman

SERVED? Obama ducks court summons at his D.C. residence, uses Secret Service as gatekeepers

The founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch Larry Klayman has filed five lawsuits against Barack Obama over the last five years …

Started by Marilyn Calkins

2 May 2, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

BOMBSHELL: What Obama Gave Hillary Just Before Election Is TREASON

The Trump administration needs to launch an investigation immediately. The very security of our nation is at stake. Republican Senator C…

Started by Marilyn Calkins

4 Apr 5, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service