All Discussions Tagged 'Elections' (132)

Discussions Replies Latest Activity

WikiLeaks: Obama Hacked French Elections For Bisexual Buddy Macron

 WikiLeaks claims that former US President Barack Obama hacked the French elections in order to help his ‘friend’ Emmanuel Macron win. Acco…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

1 Dec 17, 2017
Reply by Hank Jordan

Nine years after a 4 hour conversation with God

     Hello, my name is Michael, I am a citizen in the state of Alaska and a resident of Wasilla.  My past is checkered, and tainted.  I hav…

Started by Michael Fernandez

1 Nov 16, 2017
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

Left Wing Low LIfe Hypocricial Attacks On Our President - Russia And Election Issues

They have been screaming about their unsubstantiated claims that Trumps election staff was working with the Russians to attack Hillary.....…

Started by Bob Buske

6 Mar 19, 2017
Reply by Bob Buske

German Parliament Source Behind WikiLeaks Dump, Not Russia

  A source in the German Parliament is responsible for the recent WikiLeaks release of secret data on German-US intelligence cooperation an…

Started by Mrs.Tif Morgan

3 Dec 20, 2016
Reply by Mrs.Tif Morgan

How The UK UN European Council on Foreign Relations Attempted to Influence 2016 Elections

How The UK UN European Council on Foreign Relations Attempted to Influence the 2016 Elections against Donald Trump. The team of TTTG Networ…

Started by Hank Jordan

5 Dec 18, 2016
Reply by InfoWarsTV1

Hillary Loses Thousands Of Votes As Wisconsin Recount Backfires

 Day 3 of the Wisconsin recount has resulted in Hillary Clinton losing a staggering 18,422 votes, resulting in a huge victory for Donald Tr…

Started by Hank Jordan

3 Dec 6, 2016
Reply by Hank Jordan

Ted Cruz is not a Legal US Citizen The debate over whether or not Senator Ted Cruz is el…

Started by Ralph E WallSr

290 Aug 9, 2016
Reply by DeniseInAZ

Donald J Trump for President- 2016 Elections

 After seeing all the media bias against Trump, and the race card being played between whites and blacks, I change my mind and i will vote…

Started by Anonymous BackinBlack

442 Apr 16, 2016
Reply by Mangus Colorado

Hillary’s Secret Plan to Steal the 2016 Election Was Just Revealed

This article is timely and spot on. This is something I have been saying for years. Hillary thinks this will win for her in 2016 and it is…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

49 Oct 23, 2015
Reply by forrest jane cline

Memo to the 2016 Republican Presidential Candidates: Take a Lesson from Ronald Reagan

"In politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. Heresies in either can rarely be cured by…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

7 Aug 6, 2015
Reply by Robert William Metcalf




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service