John R. Malaspina, Jr.'s Discussions (191)

Discussions Replied To (191) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"I think i am going to save my precious breath, since it is quite obvious that nothin…"

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied Jun 26, 2015 to WORSE THAN OBAMACARE: HOUSING CASE LETS FEDS TARGET ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ RACISM

38 Jul 14, 2015
Reply by Triptolemus

ADMIN

"It all depends on whom is writing history.  Remember,  history means "his story"."

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied Jun 26, 2015 to ‘The Country As You Know It…Is Done’:Glenn Beck’s Withering Reaction to Supreme Court’s Obamacare Decision

50 Jun 27, 2015
Reply by Debra A Shawver

ADMIN

"I 'm with you on that one. "

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied Jun 26, 2015 to ‘The Country As You Know It…Is Done’:Glenn Beck’s Withering Reaction to Supreme Court’s Obamacare Decision

50 Jun 27, 2015
Reply by Debra A Shawver

ADMIN

"It's good to weed out the enemy and to keep assholes in check. "

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied May 30, 2015 to Armed Bikers to Hold Mohammed Contest Outside Cartoon Jihadist’s Mosque

106 Jun 1, 2015
Reply by Andrew

"This is an attack on my race and religion!"

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied May 29, 2015 to Catholic School Removes Statue Of Priest Because He’s White

33 Jun 1, 2015
Reply by Pete F

ADMIN

"It's time to fight patriots! "

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied May 29, 2015 to Armed Bikers to Hold Mohammed Contest Outside Cartoon Jihadist’s Mosque

106 Jun 1, 2015
Reply by Andrew

ADMIN

"If they want a fight, let's give it to them!  "

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied May 27, 2015 to REP. CLYBURN TO GOP: ‘BE VERY, VERY CAREFUL ABOUT HOW YOU TREAT THIS PRESIDENT’

53 May 28, 2015
Reply by Frank W Brown

"I agree but there comes a time when we have to show our bullies that we are not afra…"

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied May 20, 2015 to Question of the day 5/19/2015

44 May 21, 2015
Reply by James C. Watson DC

"Does anyone know of any in the Communist state of NJ? Until I find one,  then I will…"

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied May 20, 2015 to Question of the day 5/19/2015

44 May 21, 2015
Reply by James C. Watson DC

"Seriously people, is that just another way to give the Muslims jobs and screw over e…"

John R. Malaspina, Jr. replied Feb 20, 2015 to U.S. State Department’s popular new ‘JOBS FOR JIHADIS’ program is already getting flooded with applications

17 Feb 21, 2015
Reply by Skip peters

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service