Linda Hahn's Discussions (856)

Discussions Replied To (183) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"It sounds like more bread and circus to me. . .Why just one infraction?  How long wi…"

Linda Hahn replied Jul 6, 2014 to The Lawyers Behind the Lawsuit against Obama

35 Jul 7, 2014
Reply by June Gagnon

"I'm with you, Diane-they are not only not REPRESENTATIVE of Catholics-they truly can…"

Linda Hahn replied Jun 17, 2014 to Is George Soros Using Pelosi to Manipulate the Catholic Church?

35 Jun 20, 2014
Reply by John Thomas Dunlap

"We need to keep this tweet going until even the low infos can't avoid knowing it! "

Linda Hahn replied Jun 10, 2014 to Obama just openly tweets about breaking laws now: ‘I’ll keep doing whatever I can without Congress…’

21 Jun 14, 2014
Reply by Thomas Laman

ADMIN

"We all know where most of the psychopaths reside. . .I'd bet his platoon knew him we…"

Linda Hahn replied Jun 5, 2014 to DESPICABLE: Obama official suggests Bergdahl’s platoon of ‘PSYCHOPATHS’ is trying to smear him

71 Jun 10, 2014
Reply by A_Nobody

"Just read an interesting comment in my facebook feed-is it possible that the Bergdah…"

Linda Hahn replied Jun 4, 2014 to Did Obama's White House pay Millions of Dollars in Ransom for Prisoner Trade?

49 Jun 5, 2014
Reply by Mark Smithey

"Yes, it is another test of our patriotic resolve, but I think it's strengthening it! "

Linda Hahn replied Jun 3, 2014 to Pentagon knew Bergdahl’s whereabouts but didn’t risk rescue for ‘deserter’

15 Jun 4, 2014
Reply by Roger Mann

"Just seems to accentuate what a fraud she truly is!"

Linda Hahn replied May 30, 2014 to Clinton, in Book, Says She Takes Responsibility for Benghazi Attack

1 May 30, 2014
Reply by Linda Hahn

"http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05/16/gowdy-names-capitol-hill-veteran-to-bengh…"

Linda Hahn replied May 27, 2014 to How did a Muslim Brotherhood/ACLU/SPLC lobbyist get tapped for the Benghazi Special Committee?

112 Jul 2, 2014
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"If you notice the publisher of the article, you'll note that it was the Daily Beast-…"

Linda Hahn replied May 23, 2014 to Tea Party Loses Key Battles, But Is Winning The War

59 Jun 24, 2014
Reply by Robert William Metcalf

"Gosh-surprised to see she passed on Grayson.  He was so willing! (LOL!!)"

Linda Hahn replied May 21, 2014 to Bucking Deputies, Pelosi Picks 5 Democrats for Benghazi Panel

30 May 22, 2014
Reply by Robert N. Schick

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service