Linda Hahn's Discussions (856)

Discussions Replied To (183) Replies Latest Activity


"It sounds like more bread and circus to me. . .Why just one infraction?  How long wi…"

Linda Hahn replied Jul 6, 2014 to The Lawyers Behind the Lawsuit against Obama

35 Jul 7, 2014
Reply by June Gagnon

"I'm with you, Diane-they are not only not REPRESENTATIVE of Catholics-they truly can…"

Linda Hahn replied Jun 17, 2014 to Is George Soros Using Pelosi to Manipulate the Catholic Church?

35 Jun 20, 2014
Reply by John Thomas Dunlap

"We need to keep this tweet going until even the low infos can't avoid knowing it! "

Linda Hahn replied Jun 10, 2014 to Obama just openly tweets about breaking laws now: ‘I’ll keep doing whatever I can without Congress…’

21 Jun 14, 2014
Reply by Thomas Laman


"We all know where most of the psychopaths reside. . .I'd bet his platoon knew him we…"

Linda Hahn replied Jun 5, 2014 to DESPICABLE: Obama official suggests Bergdahl’s platoon of ‘PSYCHOPATHS’ is trying to smear him

71 Jun 10, 2014
Reply by A_Nobody

"Just read an interesting comment in my facebook feed-is it possible that the Bergdah…"

Linda Hahn replied Jun 4, 2014 to Did Obama's White House pay Millions of Dollars in Ransom for Prisoner Trade?

49 Jun 5, 2014
Reply by Mark Smithey

"Yes, it is another test of our patriotic resolve, but I think it's strengthening it! "

Linda Hahn replied Jun 3, 2014 to Pentagon knew Bergdahl’s whereabouts but didn’t risk rescue for ‘deserter’

15 Jun 4, 2014
Reply by Roger Mann

"Just seems to accentuate what a fraud she truly is!"

Linda Hahn replied May 30, 2014 to Clinton, in Book, Says She Takes Responsibility for Benghazi Attack

1 May 30, 2014
Reply by Linda Hahn


Linda Hahn replied May 27, 2014 to How did a Muslim Brotherhood/ACLU/SPLC lobbyist get tapped for the Benghazi Special Committee?

112 Jul 2, 2014
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"If you notice the publisher of the article, you'll note that it was the Daily Beast-…"

Linda Hahn replied May 23, 2014 to Tea Party Loses Key Battles, But Is Winning The War

59 Jun 24, 2014
Reply by Robert William Metcalf

"Gosh-surprised to see she passed on Grayson.  He was so willing! (LOL!!)"

Linda Hahn replied May 21, 2014 to Bucking Deputies, Pelosi Picks 5 Democrats for Benghazi Panel

30 May 22, 2014
Reply by Robert N. Schick




Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco


OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service