storyTman's Discussions (208)

Discussions Replied To (208) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"we americans don't care if he is a muslim if it was just a religion. But its NOT, i…"

storyTman replied Jan 17, 2015 to TOP DEMOCRAT: ‘UN-AMERICAN’ TO QUESTION MUSLIM LAWMAKER ON INTEL PANEL

68 Jan 21, 2015
Reply by Bob Russell

ADMIN

"You know he isn't in our corner. For andre Carson consistently said islam will rule…"

storyTman replied Jan 17, 2015 to TOP DEMOCRAT: ‘UN-AMERICAN’ TO QUESTION MUSLIM LAWMAKER ON INTEL PANEL

68 Jan 21, 2015
Reply by Bob Russell

"There are setting up there own rules and setting up a new caliphate"

storyTman replied Jan 13, 2015 to Islamic Sharia Law conclave established as city in New York!

57 Jan 22, 2015
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

ADMIN

"THIS HAS GOT TO STOP...WENEED AN ARMY TO HEAD UP TO DEARBORN AND SHIP THOSE 100,000…"

storyTman replied Jan 11, 2015 to Did You Know There Are Muslim ‘No-Go’ Zones In The USA

157 Jan 16, 2015
Reply by Ted I Lewis

"I believe that Obama is behind all of the distruction going on in america. What I be…"

storyTman replied Jan 11, 2015 to Obamacare Expert Rips Obama Admin, Valerie Jarrett For ‘Incompetence,’ ‘Protecting’ POTUS

41 Jan 11, 2015
Reply by forrest jane cline

ADMIN

"I am really tired of listening to these people who say  people like Sen Graham will…"

storyTman replied Jan 8, 2015 to Graham: 'We’re in a religious war; Obama's 'campaign promises are getting a lot of people killed'

25 Jan 11, 2015
Reply by AHP1081

ADMIN

"DON'T BE FOOL3D THEY DON'T NEED AN EXCUSE THEY ARE ALREADY  PROTESTING AND DESTROYIN…"

storyTman replied Jan 6, 2015 to Ferguson “Black People’s Grand Jury” Sport Communist Hats At Press Conference– Media Ignores

87 Jan 11, 2015
Reply by Carolan La Vallee Asst. Admin.

ADMIN

"These ******* don't want freedom they want free free free stuff paid by white people…"

storyTman replied Jan 6, 2015 to Ferguson “Black People’s Grand Jury” Sport Communist Hats At Press Conference– Media Ignores

87 Jan 11, 2015
Reply by Carolan La Vallee Asst. Admin.

ADMIN

"...And I will only be glad when Charlie Rangel is DEAD...then I don't have to listen…"

storyTman replied Jan 6, 2015 to Charlie Rangel: I Only Cared About Dead Soldiers When They 'Looked Like Me'

32 Jan 14, 2015
Reply by John King

"I believe this is a great idea but there is a problem I see.Who is going to be teach…"

storyTman replied Jan 5, 2015 to Indiana Joins Growing Number of States Pushing Civics Exam to Graduate High School

22 Jan 9, 2015
Reply by Linda GrayWolf

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service