Ernest J. Heassler's Discussions (522)

Discussions Replied To (522) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Poor Luis has his bragas in a wad...so what's new? I really don't think that Preside…"

Ernest J. Heassler replied Dec 5, 2016 to Luis Gutierrez to skip Trump inauguration to protest 'hatred, bigotry'

60 Dec 7, 2016
Reply by Frankmusic

"Lindsey Graham is now nothing more than an irrelevant ass. Obstructionism is the onl…"

Ernest J. Heassler replied Nov 18, 2016 to Lindsey Graham warns Donald Trump not to mess with Obama’s executive order or he’ll stand in the way

76 Nov 21, 2016

"Babs, otherwise known as "Fats", should try reading the Constitution. She is anothe…"

Ernest J. Heassler replied Nov 17, 2016 to Barbra Streisand urges Obama to bypass Senate, appoint Supreme Court justice unilaterally

38 Nov 19, 2016

"Mission accomplished, Harrigan now has his street creds as a Liberal. And the greate…"

Ernest J. Heassler replied Nov 17, 2016 to Tech company CEO who threatened to assassinate Trump . . . is no longer a CEO

44 Feb 24, 2017
Reply by Rocky Nelson

ADMIN

"Uh...it's his network. Viewership will determine it's continued existence."

Ernest J. Heassler replied Nov 16, 2016 to Cheeto Faced Glenn Beck: Americans Are Racist If They Let Stephen Bannon Into the White House

61 Nov 18, 2016
Reply by Archie C B

ADMIN

"I find it depressing to realize that Hillary Clinton will never be prosecuted for cr…"

Ernest J. Heassler replied Sep 5, 2016 to From FBI fragments, a question: Did Team Clinton destroy evidence under subpoena?

8 Sep 5, 2016
Reply by Honest Glenn

ADMIN

"It speaks volumes that Saudi Arabia, a hardcore Muslim nation, has not and will not…"

Ernest J. Heassler replied Dec 16, 2015 to Obama says Muslim refugees are like Catholics in 1900

44 Dec 17, 2015
Reply by sharon ostwinch

ADMIN

"Awww, gee! The widdle MSM weenies have hurt feewings and want there mommies to hold…"

Ernest J. Heassler replied Dec 8, 2015 to TRUMP SHOULD APOLOGIZE!

144 Dec 17, 2015
Reply by DeniseInAZ

ADMIN

"She won't be missed."

Ernest J. Heassler replied Dec 5, 2015 to New Jersey councilwoman quits over 'Christmas' tree lighting

191 Dec 8, 2015
Reply by Larry R. Burton

ADMIN

"If it weren't for Democrat patronage jobs, Rice wouldn't have one."

Ernest J. Heassler replied Oct 8, 2015 to Susan Rice: Netanyahu did everything but use 'the n-word' to describe Obama

65 Nov 22, 2015
Reply by martin smith lll

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service