Bradley Rowan's Discussions (62)

Discussions Replied To (59) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Geez, this sounds an awful lot like what the Democratic Party is doing now with Blac…"

Bradley Rowan replied Nov 18, 2016 to Professors call Founding Fathers ‘terrorists,’ founding ideals a ‘fabrication’

58 Nov 25, 2016
Reply by Philip D. Steenbergen

ADMIN

"The scariest part of this is that this person votes. Oh my Lord."

Bradley Rowan replied Sep 6, 2016 to Social Justice Warrior Harasses Lyft Driver Over His Hula Doll, Gets Left on Side of Road

38 Sep 9, 2016
Reply by Douglas W. Rodrigues

ADMIN

"Maybe Obummer will draw another red line"

Bradley Rowan replied Jul 30, 2016 to U.S. Warships Surround Disputed Chinese Waters, Prepared For War: "WWIII At Stake"

24 Jul 30, 2016
Reply by Bradley Rowan

ADMIN

"You are so right; they never give up anything they have taken."

Bradley Rowan replied Jun 28, 2016 to And you thought the Transportation Act Was Just About Fixing Roads......Sorry, folks, think again!

22 Jun 28, 2016
Reply by Andrew

ADMIN

"I'm not saying we need that and I think you know that. You are absolutely correct in…"

Bradley Rowan replied Jun 28, 2016 to And you thought the Transportation Act Was Just About Fixing Roads......Sorry, folks, think again!

22 Jun 28, 2016
Reply by Andrew

ADMIN

"As much as I hate the thought of taxes, a new tax becomes a necessity. As the use of…"

Bradley Rowan replied Jun 27, 2016 to And you thought the Transportation Act Was Just About Fixing Roads......Sorry, folks, think again!

22 Jun 28, 2016
Reply by Andrew

ADMIN

"I guess this is a good thing but moving from NBC to CNN is just a change from the sa…"

Bradley Rowan replied Jan 20, 2016 to Finally: RNC severs ties with NBC News for February 26 debate

26 Jan 20, 2016
Reply by Jea9

"OK. Most of this is a non-issue. Some of it may be true but not enough to sway my vo…"

Bradley Rowan replied Jan 17, 2016 to TEA PARTY MEMBERS HERE IS WHY TED CRUZ SHOULD NEVER BE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT

1806 Mar 15, 2016
Reply by Little Bright Feather

ADMIN

"There is no such thing as a "temporary tax". If you believe there is your health cos…"

Bradley Rowan replied Dec 29, 2015 to Dem calls for temporary tax to pay for ISIS war

35 Jan 1, 2016
Reply by Lyn Agre

ADMIN

"Note where the story originates. Students all over the country are objecting to Mooc…"

Bradley Rowan replied Dec 29, 2015 to Chicago public school students protest their … FREE cafeteria food

31 Dec 30, 2015
Reply by donna laino

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service