John King's Discussions (816)

Discussions Replied To (815) Replies Latest Activity

"exactly Michael"

John King replied Feb 3, 2017 to Trump Signs Orders That Would Allow Police Officers to Enforce Immigration Laws

40 Feb 7, 2017
Reply by Archie C B

"President Trump is correct in this action and I support him 100%"

John King replied Feb 3, 2017 to Trump Signs Orders That Would Allow Police Officers to Enforce Immigration Laws

40 Feb 7, 2017
Reply by Archie C B

ADMIN

"And when they do. it is time for America to wipe Mexico from the planet, and show th…"

John King replied Jan 30, 2017 to Jaw Dropping – Mexican Official Threatens to Unleash Cartels, Flood U.S. With Drugs and Narcotics….

62 Jan 31, 2017
Reply by gary r. hill

ADMIN

"President Trump is 100% correct. It is about time America's commander and chief show…"

John King replied Jan 26, 2017 to Trump order to target UN, other global organizations

28 Jan 29, 2017
Reply by Sally Gangi

ADMIN

"I agree with Ms. Conway, America knows the media or the press no longer reports news…"

John King replied Jan 23, 2017 to In Blistering Interview, Conway Tells Chuck Todd "We Are Going To Have To Rethink Our Relationship With The Press"

20 Jan 26, 2017
Reply by pahrumper

ADMIN

"The BIAS media should not be allowed in this hotel for any reason, at any time perio…"

John King replied Jan 20, 2017 to Press banned from Trump's DC hotel: report

33 Jan 21, 2017
Reply by Skip peters

ADMIN

"Chuck Schumer and the Democratic are shit bags, thay need to keep their mouths shut,…"

John King replied Jan 5, 2017 to Schumer: Trump better pick a mainstream Supreme Court nominee, or else

46 Jan 10, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

ADMIN

"Ultimately, it has been the people of America and the rest of the world that has suf…"

John King replied Jan 5, 2017 to WAR GAMES US sends special forces to RUSSIAN BORDER as Nato is poised to strike back against Vladimir Putin’s ‘aggression’

37 Jan 6, 2017
Reply by Honest Glenn

ADMIN

"With respect  to Mr.Sessions, if these people were protesting peacefully, why were t…"

John King replied Jan 5, 2017 to NAACP President, four others arrested during sit-in at office of Jeff Sessions

30 Jan 6, 2017
Reply by douglas a hawkins

ADMIN

"Hillary Clinton will never see the White House as President, in spite of all the Dem…"

John King replied Oct 28, 2016 to Love Him Or Hate Him: Trump Is The Revolution Against The Establishment

20 Nov 5, 2016
Reply by Jea9

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service