Anna C Kania's Discussions (270)

Discussions Replied To (269) Replies Latest Activity

"If this is true and at this point I have no reason to disbelieve it, I will cancel e…"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 11, 2017 to Trump Uses Obama Executive Order to declare George Soros a National Security Threat

70 Feb 12, 2017
Reply by Frank W Brown

"Soros should be tried as a 'war criminal'!"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 11, 2017 to Trump Uses Obama Executive Order to declare George Soros a National Security Threat

70 Feb 12, 2017
Reply by Frank W Brown

"I am wondering about Oren Long as well! Are we not supporters of 'free speech'? If n…"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 11, 2017 to Trump Uses Obama Executive Order to declare George Soros a National Security Threat

70 Feb 12, 2017
Reply by Frank W Brown

"I can only pray that this is the truth! This menace to our Republic needs to be neut…"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 11, 2017 to Trump Uses Obama Executive Order to declare George Soros a National Security Threat

70 Feb 12, 2017
Reply by Frank W Brown

ADMIN

"I hope they are all laid off permanently!"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 11, 2017 to Report: At Least 180 Federal Workers Planning to Disobey Trump Administration

55 Feb 11, 2017
Reply by Randal W. Howard

ADMIN

"Relieved he was 'fired'; but he also should face jail time for inciting violence!!!…"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 11, 2017 to Teacher fired after writing ‘Only good Trump supporter is a dead Trump supporter’

43 Feb 13, 2017
Reply by John Barr

ADMIN

"So glad he shut her up; she was spewing nothing but lies!"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 8, 2017 to GOP Tells Chief Liz ‘Running-Mouth’ Warren to SIT Down And SHUT Up For Breaching Senate Rules!

20 Feb 9, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

ADMIN

"Taste of his own medicine!"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 8, 2017 to Democrats Expel Black DNC Chair Candidate for Citing Islam’s Positions on Gays

38 Feb 9, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

ADMIN

"They should all be in jail along with Soros and Clinton!"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 8, 2017 to In Their Own Words: Anti-Trump ‘Resistance’ Leaders Say They Want To Make America ‘Ungovernable’

59 Feb 9, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

ADMIN

"They won't feel that way when they are over run and their country no longer belongs…"

Anna C Kania replied Feb 7, 2017 to Trump Sparks Refugee Exodus To Canada

55 Feb 27, 2017
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service