Doug Richards's Discussions (113)

Discussions Replied To (26) Replies Latest Activity

"I think the performance of all the Patriotic Americans that took the stand for Chik-…"

Doug Richards replied Aug 6, 2012 to OBAMA ALMOST READY TO SILENCE YOUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH, REDRESS GOVERNMENT

102 Sep 10, 2012
Reply by John Gearhart

ADMIN

"I think he is more comcerned about winning this election than he wants to admit even…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 29, 2012 to IT CAN WAIT: OBAMA ADMIN REPORTEDLY PUTTING OFF COSTLY & CONTROVERSIAL REGS UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION

16 Jul 30, 2012
Reply by Healani

"They will fund it to keep their paychecks coming and for no other reason. The could…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 25, 2012 to HOUSE GOP LEADERS INDICATE THEY WILL FUND OBAMACARE

41 Jul 28, 2012
Reply by June Gagnon

"Not enough people have seen the movie the Mancharian Candidate or remember it well e…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 17, 2012 to Is Obama Ripping Off the Mask?????

33 Jul 18, 2012
Reply by Neal W. Welsh

ADMIN

"I am a Christian and Love God and Jesus with all my heart and I also love this count…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 14, 2012 to George H.W. Bush: ‘Who the hell’ is Grover Norquist?

21 Jul 24, 2012
Reply by van nolan price

ADMIN

"One thing about Uncle Ted. He will always say it the way it is and never pulls any p…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 8, 2012 to TED NUGENT: Turncoat Roberts

51 Jul 14, 2012
Reply by Healani

"Thomas Jefferson? This is amazing. There are two parts. Be sure to read the 2nd part…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 5, 2012 to OBAMA TOLD TO BACK OFF U.N. GUN TREATY

209 Jul 12, 2012
Reply by Michael J Nellett

ADMIN

"RH asked when we are going to get tough and fight back. If everything works out as i…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 5, 2012 to Lawyers Have Already Drafted 13,000 Pages of Regulations for New ObamaTax Law

28 Jul 7, 2012
Reply by Oren Long

"I have made this statement more than once but will say it one more time. The only wa…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 5, 2012 to "THEY".... TOOK OUR FREEDOMS AWAY FROM US.... WHO?, WHY?.... WHAT CAN WE DO?

257 Jul 14, 2012
Reply by van nolan price

"Question 1 Will the main stream media lie to the American people. That answer is an…"

Doug Richards replied Jul 2, 2012 to Is Obama's Support Weaker Than Poll Numbers Appear?.... (would the lamestream media lie to us?)

46 Jul 3, 2012
Reply by Charles Bill L.CDurry

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service