Frank Carter's Discussions (210)

Discussions Replied To (210) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

" THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU"

Frank Carter replied Sep 30, 2015 to GOP Candidates Support Shutdown Of Agency Accused of ‘Paying Off Friends In The Climate Change Business’

16 Oct 1, 2015
Reply by RFB_Mod

ADMIN

"Well folks, I am not in favor of PP, but what they should have thrown at Carly was…"

Frank Carter replied Sep 29, 2015 to PLANNED PARENTHOOD PAID PROTESTORS WHO THREW CONDOMS AT CARLY FIORINA

27 Sep 30, 2015
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

ADMIN

"Here is another libturd new paper that has it's head up their ass.  Just look at w…"

Frank Carter replied Sep 29, 2015 to NEW YORK TIMES: Backward Southerners Are Unduly Frightened by Muslim Syrian Refugee Dump

68 Oct 6, 2015
Reply by Thomas T Taylor

ADMIN

" TED CRUZ"

Frank Carter replied Sep 28, 2015 to Congressional Conservatives Make Their Stand: We have enough votes to prevent anybody from being Speaker

34 Sep 29, 2015
Reply by Robert McGuire

"Carson should withdraw.  I believe he would make a great Surgeon General.  For Presi…"

Frank Carter replied Sep 28, 2015 to Who should withdraw; Trump or Carson?

98 Sep 29, 2015
Reply by Ray Hause

ADMIN

"That is a great question.  I keep wondering why since he sounds like Hildabeast.  In…"

Frank Carter replied Sep 27, 2015 to Watch how candidates react to the de-Boehnification of the House

17 Sep 27, 2015
Reply by Frank Carter

" Term limits on these sons a bitches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Frank Carter replied Sep 25, 2015 to Scalia Characterizes the US Supreme Court As “Extreme” And “Unrepresentative”; Hammers Its Homosexual Marriage Decision

22 Sep 27, 2015
Reply by Oren Long

"And now people are starting to understand why Trump is on top of the pile.  It is go…"

Frank Carter replied Sep 25, 2015 to Lawmaker Demands Audit of U.S. Refugee Costs

16 Sep 29, 2015
Reply by Robert William Metcalf

ADMIN

"I can see all this BS about Trump is out there just to make more news.  I don't giv…"

Frank Carter replied Sep 25, 2015 to Political scientists think "the party" will stop Trump. They shouldn't be so sure.

27 Sep 28, 2015
Reply by Jo Anne Savage

ADMIN

"My question is, why challenge a true statement.   what's to challenge?    Please, al…"

Frank Carter replied Sep 19, 2015 to Trump backs 2nd Amendment, calls for national concealed carry

34 Sep 20, 2015

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service