Marcia Wood's Discussions (179)

Discussions Replied To (42) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Boehner and McCain come from the same camp and it isn't the Conservative camp.  They…"

Marcia Wood replied Jun 4, 2013 to John McCain Slams Issa for Calling Jay Carney a Liar

110 Jun 8, 2013
Reply by Thomas Treusch

ADMIN

"A liar is a liar and Issa just passed the politically correct crap and identified Ja…"

Marcia Wood replied Jun 4, 2013 to John McCain Slams Issa for Calling Jay Carney a Liar

110 Jun 8, 2013
Reply by Thomas Treusch

ADMIN

"Joe is resilient and a Patriot - DOJ tried to shut him down too if you remember and…"

Marcia Wood replied May 30, 2013 to Sheriff Arpaio recall effort fails

84 Jun 4, 2013
Reply by JOHN LIESKE

ADMIN

"Chicken liver is what I call all of these people - the mistake made is we didn't sav…"

Marcia Wood replied May 21, 2013 to Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"

52 May 24, 2013
Reply by sr williams

ADMIN

"Famous last words of one some call Mr. President.  I didn't know anythng about this…"

Marcia Wood replied May 19, 2013 to OBAMA DENIES ROLE IN GOVERNMENT

91 May 24, 2013
Reply by A_Nobody

ADMIN

"Seven months later and we still haven't put those behind bars who perpetrated the at…"

Marcia Wood replied May 1, 2013 to MIND-BLOWING TRANSCRIPT OF BENGHAZI WHISTLE-BLOWER: US identified terrorist behind 9/11 attack but refuses to capture him

49 May 2, 2013
Reply by Rich

"So proud of Rand Paul and those brave men who stood up for AMERICA, Americans and th…"

Marcia Wood replied Mar 9, 2013 to Press Release of Senator Cruz - Cruz, Paul Introduce Bill to Prohibit Drone Killings of U.S. Citizens

48 Mar 11, 2013
Reply by Robert Lee Prinz

ADMIN

"This is just one more cover up in the assassinations - there will be more corrective…"

Marcia Wood replied Dec 8, 2012 to Clinton to testify in open hearing on deadly Benghazi attack

49 Dec 11, 2012
Reply by CWD

"Nothing to do with ground game - it's voter fraud and we all knew this was coming wi…"

Marcia Wood replied Nov 19, 2012 to Romney's Ohio disaster forces GOP rethink

72 Nov 20, 2012

ADMIN

"Yep, without Holder he'll be up that creek without a paddle. "

Marcia Wood replied Nov 14, 2012 to REPORT: OBAMA ASKS HOLDER TO STAY FOR SECOND TERM

26 Nov 15, 2012
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service