allen blaine's Discussions (83)

Discussions Replied To (83) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"These idiots better be careful. George Soros is going to go too far and all hell wil…"

allen blaine replied Feb 24, 2017 to Soros-Linked Former Clinton Staffer Behind 'Organized' Townhall Protests

43 Feb 27, 2017
Reply by ROY S. MALLMANN II

ADMIN

"May I suggest that the congress pass emergency legislation forcing the CIA to brief…"

allen blaine replied Dec 16, 2016 to Intelligence Agencies Refuse to Brief House Intelligence Committee on Russian Hacking

32 Dec 17, 2016
Reply by John Barr

"The false narrative that treaties over ride the constitution is BS. The constitution…"

allen blaine replied Dec 16, 2016 to Second Amendment ALERT- Obama Sends UN Arms Trade Treaty to Senate for Ratification

26 Dec 16, 2016
Reply by Debra Beatty

ADMIN

"No, Obama can sign the treaty but without the consent of the senate it is just anoth…"

allen blaine replied Aug 30, 2016 to Obama to 'ratify' climate change treaty without getting Senate approval

28 Aug 31, 2016
Reply by Stephen Kazmer

"Zukerberg can go to hell. We all nee to wipe out our facebook pages and see where th…"

allen blaine replied Aug 2, 2016 to FACEBOOK BLOCKS MICHAEL SAVAGE FOR POSTING NEWS ON ISLAMIC CRIME

27 Aug 5, 2016
Reply by Jea9

ADMIN

"That is why the BLM was after Finicum last year. Also the land owners in the western…"

allen blaine replied Jul 29, 2016 to These Are The Two Companies That Might Land Clinton’s Foundation In Big Legal Trouble

24 Jul 31, 2016
Reply by Randal W. Howard

ADMIN

"Are you aware that Gorge Soros and Hillary Clinton are all for this con-con? Before…"

allen blaine replied Apr 28, 2016 to Maine citizens vote at GOP Convention to include Convention of States in platform

22 May 1, 2016
Reply by Anthony Ibbott

ADMIN

"At the first convention in 1786, at the drop of the gavel, all rules were dropped, t…"

allen blaine replied Apr 28, 2016 to Maine citizens vote at GOP Convention to include Convention of States in platform

22 May 1, 2016
Reply by Anthony Ibbott

ADMIN

"Who is the author of this article? who did the interview? There is no way to confron…"

allen blaine replied Jan 9, 2016 to Columnist: I’m More Afraid Of Legal Gun Owners Than Gun-Wielding Criminals

92 Jan 31, 2016
Reply by ABU TOM

ADMIN

"It will start in and around the Euphrates river. From there the whole world will be…"

allen blaine replied Dec 11, 2015 to Russian Military Told To Boost "Strategic Nuclear Forces Amid Rising Tensions With The U.S."

26 Dec 14, 2015
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service