Paul Z.'s Discussions (2,985)

Discussions Replied To (2953) Replies Latest Activity


"A Ted Cruz or Scott Walker Presidency will kill the anti-Conservative Establishment.…"

Paul Z. replied Mar 27, 2015 to GOPissed OFF: Conservatives… Is It Time To Wreck The GOP Establishment?

65 Apr 5, 2015
Reply by John Porter


"I just heard that the Senate voted for a budget that balances the budget in 10 years…"

Paul Z. replied Mar 27, 2015 to Legal duo says Cruz eligible to seek presidency

1218 Apr 7, 2015
Reply by Bob Sip

"I have been fighting ILLEGAL Trespassing for decades. I figured by the heavy losses…"

Paul Z. replied Mar 5, 2015 to Stop Caving on Immigration, 2016 Contenders

35 Mar 5, 2015
Reply by Robert Rixford


"I am extremely pissed. Like I stated many times, even though about 70% of the Republ…"

Paul Z. replied Mar 4, 2015 to Boehner Cave On Executive Amnesty Complete: House Passes “Clean” DHS Funding Bill, 257-167…

228 Apr 11, 2015
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"While having Obama's Unlawful Amnesty blocked by a Federal Judge, we have seen how t…"

Paul Z. replied Feb 22, 2015 to Obama Has No Backup Plan On Immigration

39 Feb 23, 2015
Reply by Bonnie Somer

"I certainly hope they can get the truth on this. I have always wondered why such a l…"

Paul Z. replied Feb 9, 2015 to SEAL Team 6 & Extortion 17 Families Suspect Crash Was Inside Job

45 Feb 12, 2015
Reply by Patriot Runner


"Why are all Liberal women so butt ugly?"

Paul Z. replied Feb 8, 2015 to Ruth Bader Ginsburg Wants An All-Female Supreme Court

59 Feb 15, 2015
Reply by James C. Watson DC

"Somebody better send the police over to arrest Al Gore for using the energy of 10 "a…"

Paul Z. replied Feb 8, 2015 to Police Promise to Extort, Kidnap, or Lock You in a Cage for Warming Up Your Car

37 Feb 10, 2015
Reply by Bob Russell


"Gowdy may make Hillary slip-up & make false statements that may come back &…"

Paul Z. replied Feb 8, 2015 to Trey Gowdy’s New Benghazi Witness List A Who’s Who Of Former And Current Obama Operatives

33 Feb 11, 2015
Reply by Alan Endsley

"Sorry Kevin Calvey, you elected officials are just that, elected to represent us &am…"

Paul Z. replied Feb 8, 2015 to Oklahoma GOP Rep Proposes Bill To Make It Illegal To Prosecute Elected Officials

45 Feb 10, 2015
Reply by Bob Sip




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service