PHILIP SCHNEIDER's Discussions (1,552)

Discussions Replied To (1548) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"NO ONE . . . . has identified the breaking of a law that occurred by Flynn. NO one!…"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 15, 2017 to Bret Baier: Sources fear ‘intelligence industrial complex’ trying to ‘disqualify’ Trump

15 Feb 15, 2017
Reply by PHILIP SCHNEIDER

ADMIN

"They had to keep Sessions in congress to vote for other President Trump cabinet choi…"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 15, 2017 to Priebus Future In Doubt As Trump Allies Circulate List of Alternate Chief of Staff Candidates

78 Feb 18, 2017
Reply by John Barr

"She is STILL a terrorist. She should be deported immediately and banned forever."

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 15, 2017 to Illegal Muslim Immigrant Who Killed Jews Has TERRIFYING New Job

20 Feb 16, 2017
Reply by John Barr

ADMIN

"The Hitllary State Department had multiple money funnels whereby she got money to th…"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 14, 2017 to Judicial Watch: ‘Unlawful’ State Dept ‘Stonewalled’ Request for Refugee Travel Loan, Taxpayer Loss Info

16 Apr 25, 2018
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

ADMIN

"This is the type of Islamic immigrant that can wait years if necessary, to carry out…"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 14, 2017 to Report: Gay NPR commentary contributor charged with assault in Betsy DeVos fracas was a refugee whose family fled the Taliban

30 Feb 16, 2017
Reply by John Barr

"The LEFT will get their "pound of flesh" at the next NSA selection hearings and this…"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 14, 2017 to Gen. Flynn Thrown Under The Bus... by Trump and Company

118 Feb 17, 2017
Reply by John Barr

"NO, I don't! What I prefer to do is: Is eliminate all the free stuff the liberal pro…"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 13, 2017 to Bill Kristol Says ‘Lazy’ White Working Class Should Be Replaced By ‘New Americans’

78 Feb 15, 2017
Reply by douglas a hawkins

"The Trump paradigm is present at our borders, F I N A L L Y  ! ! !"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 13, 2017 to VIDEO: Border Patrol Refuses To Let Muslim Into Country After Finding Dangerous Material On Her Cellphone

33 Feb 15, 2017
Reply by Jea9

ADMIN

"The democrats want to BRING BACK SEGREGATION!"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 11, 2017 to It’s Like the 1960s All Over Again!… Democrats Block School Doors to GOP Official Who Wants to Help Black Kids

31 Feb 13, 2017
Reply by Jea9

ADMIN

"Excellent!"

PHILIP SCHNEIDER replied Feb 11, 2017 to Mainstream media falsely refers to Somalian rapist Mohamed Harir Ayanle as a “Minneapolis man,” then later refuses to report whether or not he showed up for his court hearing

22 Feb 13, 2017
Reply by Debra A Shawver

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service